No i cant cause you dont want it. You just want to prove your point of view. This is not my interest.

I want to make it clear GUYS
REAL ORDER FLOW is a hard stuff. I do not know for this moment of my OF carrier any of opened sources who teaches the OF in a correct way.
The whole concept that was in the begining of this thread had changed drasticly. Tape itself is only 20-30% of order flow. The rest things are context, trade management and flow of orders. If you cant understand it, your reading will be sporadic. Sometimes it will be above 50% but never 80-100% correct.
And if you want results you NEED to read 80-100% correct. Or in a long run you will fail. Thats it. The end of the game.

I guess a lot of people struggle with OF as well. Could you explain what exactly had changed and how do you use OF now?
It would be extremely helpful

I didn`t want to argue whatsoever. I`ve spent a lot of time and efforts in order to understand Order Flow. But the more I read the more questions I have and more contradiction I see in different sourses.

It would not. Telling about order flow doesnt makes you learn it. It has to be shown and to be taught.
How it changed.
1) Context added.
2) Context researched deep and wide.
3) Within context all Tape moves assigned to that context and what thy mean.
4) After step 3 you start to get data of new level of meaning and the whole new concept
5) Context RE created and tape meaning reassigned to that context
6) Researched deep and wide
7) Context 3.0 created with different groups of traders and different meanings of OF with those groups
8) Market mechanics concept created describing how why than and where disbalances occure
9) Tape meaning reassigned to that Context 3.0
10) Order Flow started to look structurized and sequential
11) Tape 2.0 created
12) Within this Tape 2.0 concept created different trading styles
13) Management concept added
14) Order flow meaning reasigned based on the management + context
and so and so and so
If you wanna you can try to do in on your own way
than i started that thread i was asking peoples to research with me. Few were participating and this ended up that i stayed on my own.
So after few years of instant improving i can say now that i mastered it almost completely and now i can produce advanced concepts.
For example

To go higher you need sellers and to go lower you need buyers. The price goes up because there enough sellers and price goes down because there enough buyers. To get more sellers you need to lure em and need to build a trap

15) Traps concept added

Traps has different scale and different stages and one trap fluently goes in to another. In this context try to read Tape or OF. Can you? Does it helped you? Not sure

It would not. Telling about order flow doesnt makes you learn it. It has to be shown and to be taught.
How it changed.
1) Context added.
2) Context researched deep and wide.
3) Within context all Tape moves assigned to that context and what thy mean.
4) After step 3 you start to get data of new level of meaning and the whole new concept
5) Context RE created and tape meaning reassigned to that context
6) Researched deep and wide
7) Context 3.0 created with different groups of traders and different meanings of OF with those groups
8) Market mechanics concept created describing how why than and where disbalances occure
9) Tape meaning reassigned to that Context 3.0
10) Order Flow started to look structurized and sequential
11) Tape 2.0 created
12) Within this Tape 2.0 concept created different trading styles
13) Management concept added
14) Order flow meaning reasigned based on the management + context
and so and so and so
If you wanna you can try to do in on your own way
than i started that thread i was asking peoples to research with me. Few were participating and this ended up that i stayed on my own.
So after few years of instant improving i can say now that i mastered it almost completely and now i can produce advanced concepts.
For example

To go higher you need sellers and to go lower you need buyers. The price goes up because there enough sellers and price goes down because there enough buyers. To get more sellers you need to lure em and need to build a trap

15) Traps concept added

Traps has different scale and different stages and one trap fluently goes in to another. In this context try to read Tape or OF. Can you? Does it helped you? Not sure

Actually, I didn`t discover anything yet. There are a lot of "masters" with smart faces pouring water for hours

I understand you regarding traps, but what exactly are you watching for? How do you determine that there is a disbalance in the market? And what do you imply by context? Price action?

I understand you regarding traps, but what exactly are you watching for? How do you determine that there is a disbalance in the market? And what do you imply by context? Price action?