Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research - futures io
futures io



Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research


Discussion in Stocks and ETFs

Updated
    1. trending_up 882 views
    2. thumb_up 2 thanks given
    3. group 1 followers
    1. forum 1 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
 steve2222 
Auckland, New Zealand
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: Whatever moves in my timezone
 
Posts: 1,889 since Sep 2009
Thanks: 3,355 given, 1,522 received


Quoting 
Professional equity managers - of mutual funds, pension funds or hedge funds - use a number of methods to try to beat their benchmark index.

These broadly fall into one of two camps, "active" and "passive," and a debate over which gets better results has raged since at least the late 1960s.

Passive managers have been able to claim the upper hand by pointing to the well-known tendency of active equity managers to underperform their benchmark index.

Although this conclusion is widely accepted, there have been few attempts to find out why the index crowd outperforms.

After all, it is one thing for active equity managers to fail to beat the benchmark index -- that could imply only a lack of skill to do better than random selection.

But it is much harder to explain why most active equity managers fail to keep up with the benchmark index, a shortcoming that implies these investment professionals are doing something that systematically leads to underperformance.

The answer, we believe, lies in the fact that the best performing stocks in a broad index perform much better than the other stocks in the index, most of which perform relatively badly. That means average index returns depend heavily on the relatively small set of winners.

We developed a simple model that incorporates this idea.

By randomly selecting a small subset of securities from the index, we maximized the chance of outperforming the index - which validates the allure of active equity management - but it also maximized the chance of underperforming the index, with the chance of underperformance being larger than the chance of overperformance.

Here is a simple illustration of our main idea:

Consider an index of five securities. Four (though we don't know which) will return 10 percent and one will return 50 percent.

Suppose active managers choose portfolios of one or two securities and each investment is weighted equally. There are 15 possible one or two security "portfolios." Of these, 10 will earn returns of 10 percent, because they will include only the 10 percent securities.

Just five of the 15 portfolios will include the 50 percent winner, earning 30 percent if part of a two-security portfolio and 50 percent if it is the sole asset in a one-security portfolio.

The mean average return for all possible actively managed portfolios will be 18 percent; the median actively managed portfolio will earn 10 percent. The equally weighted index of all five securities will earn 18 percent.

In other words, the average active-management return will be the same as the index, but two-thirds of the actively managed portfolios will underperform the index because they will omit the 50 percent winner.

That is, if the typical active manager's picks are no better than a random selection from the benchmark - a view many active managers might endorse, at least when judging their peers - then we can expect those active managers to underperform the index.

Researchers have focused on the costs of active management as primarily the fees paid to the managers.

Our results suggest a much much higher cost: the inherently high probability of underperformance that comes with attempts at stock selection, which disproportionately increases the chance of underperformance relative to the chance of overperformance.

Those allocating assets (such as pension funds and endowments) should revisit the assumption that the only cost of active investing compared with indexing is the active managers' fees.

The benefits of identifying the best active managers may be greater than previously thought.

J.B. Heaton is an attorney with Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar and Scott in Chicago. Nicholas G. Polson is professor of econometrics and statistics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Jan Hendrik Witte is affiliated with the Mathematical Institute of the University of Oxford.

Why indexing outperforms stock-picking - Economy - NZ Herald News

Started this thread Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to steve2222 for this post:

Journal Challenge April 2021 results (now extended!):
Competing for $1800 in prizes from Jigsaw
looks_oneMaking a Living with the Microsby sstheo
(302 thanks from 30 posts)
looks_twoSalao's Journalby Salao
(81 thanks from 13 posts)
looks_3Deetee’s DAX Trading Journal (time based)by Deetee
(50 thanks from 20 posts)
looks_4Learning to Profit - A journey in algorithms and optionsby Syntax
(38 thanks from 16 posts)
looks_5Maybe a little bit different journalby Malykubo
(17 thanks from 18 posts)
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on futures io
The Crude Dude Oil Trading System
122 thanks
Big Mike in Ecuador
60 thanks
Help improve the FIO community
38 thanks
Next New Poll Ideas/Suggestions
20 thanks
futures io site changelog and issues/problem reporting
16 thanks


futures io Trading Community Traders Hideout Stocks and ETFs > Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research


Last Updated on November 14, 2015


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing
 

Journal Challenge w/$1,800 in prizes!

April

An Introduction to CME Group Micro Bitcoin Futures w/David Lerman

Elite only
     



Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada), info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts