Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research - Stocks and ETFs Trading | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading

Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research
Updated: Views / Replies:430 / 1
Created: by steve2222 Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 100,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Thread Tools Search this Thread

Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research

  #1 (permalink)
Just a boy
Auckland, New Zealand
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker/Data: AMP/CQG
Favorite Futures: Whatever moves in my timezone
Posts: 1,810 since Sep 2009
Thanks: 3,175 given, 1,396 received

Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research

Professional equity managers - of mutual funds, pension funds or hedge funds - use a number of methods to try to beat their benchmark index.

These broadly fall into one of two camps, "active" and "passive," and a debate over which gets better results has raged since at least the late 1960s.

Passive managers have been able to claim the upper hand by pointing to the well-known tendency of active equity managers to underperform their benchmark index.

Although this conclusion is widely accepted, there have been few attempts to find out why the index crowd outperforms.

After all, it is one thing for active equity managers to fail to beat the benchmark index -- that could imply only a lack of skill to do better than random selection.

But it is much harder to explain why most active equity managers fail to keep up with the benchmark index, a shortcoming that implies these investment professionals are doing something that systematically leads to underperformance.

The answer, we believe, lies in the fact that the best performing stocks in a broad index perform much better than the other stocks in the index, most of which perform relatively badly. That means average index returns depend heavily on the relatively small set of winners.

We developed a simple model that incorporates this idea.

By randomly selecting a small subset of securities from the index, we maximized the chance of outperforming the index - which validates the allure of active equity management - but it also maximized the chance of underperforming the index, with the chance of underperformance being larger than the chance of overperformance.

Here is a simple illustration of our main idea:

Consider an index of five securities. Four (though we don't know which) will return 10 percent and one will return 50 percent.

Suppose active managers choose portfolios of one or two securities and each investment is weighted equally. There are 15 possible one or two security "portfolios." Of these, 10 will earn returns of 10 percent, because they will include only the 10 percent securities.

Just five of the 15 portfolios will include the 50 percent winner, earning 30 percent if part of a two-security portfolio and 50 percent if it is the sole asset in a one-security portfolio.

The mean average return for all possible actively managed portfolios will be 18 percent; the median actively managed portfolio will earn 10 percent. The equally weighted index of all five securities will earn 18 percent.

In other words, the average active-management return will be the same as the index, but two-thirds of the actively managed portfolios will underperform the index because they will omit the 50 percent winner.

That is, if the typical active manager's picks are no better than a random selection from the benchmark - a view many active managers might endorse, at least when judging their peers - then we can expect those active managers to underperform the index.

Researchers have focused on the costs of active management as primarily the fees paid to the managers.

Our results suggest a much much higher cost: the inherently high probability of underperformance that comes with attempts at stock selection, which disproportionately increases the chance of underperformance relative to the chance of overperformance.

Those allocating assets (such as pension funds and endowments) should revisit the assumption that the only cost of active investing compared with indexing is the active managers' fees.

The benefits of identifying the best active managers may be greater than previously thought.

J.B. Heaton is an attorney with Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar and Scott in Chicago. Nicholas G. Polson is professor of econometrics and statistics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Jan Hendrik Witte is affiliated with the Mathematical Institute of the University of Oxford.

Why indexing outperforms stock-picking - Economy - NZ Herald News

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to steve2222 for this post:
  #2 (permalink)
Quick Summary
Quick Summary Post

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.


futures io > > > > Active vs Passive funds managers - interesting research

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

September Journal Challenge (sponsored by TopstepTrader)


Battlestations! Win $947 in prizes for showing us your trading desk!


Finding Your Edge & Maximizing Returns w/Richard L Weissman

Oct 16

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Money Managers Fight Their Emotions and Sometimes Lose kbit News and Current Events 0 April 8th, 2014 08:23 PM
Smart Money? Hedge Funds Now Worse Than Mutual Funds Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 November 23rd, 2012 02:20 PM
Dumb Money: Hedge Funds Can't Even Beat Bond Funds Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 July 10th, 2012 06:50 PM
Money managers doublebee Trading Reviews and Vendors 2 November 10th, 2011 11:17 AM
Fanless / Passive quad video card Big Mike Tech Support 28 June 4th, 2011 02:04 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM. (this page content is cached, log in for real-time version)

Copyright © 2018 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432,
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2018-10-13 in 0.10 seconds with 14 queries on phoenix