Posts: 2,493 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 2,441
Thanks Received: 3,791
|
The choice of data feed should depend on your frequency of trading, not the cost of the routing fee. You will end up paying a lot more if your data is slow (in slippage and missed execution). In your search for the cheapest, you end up paying the highest price. Last week, we switched a customer to Sierra via CTS, and it made a huge difference for his trading slippage and stability.
If you trade here and there, any data feed will do, and I also respect that not all data feeds cover all the markets internationally. Again, focus on latency and stability. Only time will tell you how good your feed is, so trust your intuition, and if you trade frequently, I would open two accounts and compare them side by side over time and see how they both do in slow and fast markets.
Matt Z
Optimus Futures
There is a substantial risk of loss in futures trading. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected] |
|
