Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Sierra Chart ending CTS connection on May 31, 2019
I received this system message when logging into my Sierra Chart the past few days. With the help of Matt at Optimus Futures I am migrating over to Sierra Chart's new service with TT. I can update my experience, as it unfolds.
I am getting help from the folk at Optimus. My impression is that this new TT solution is the direction that Sierra's development team are leading most if not all Sierra Chart users.
I started the trading combine for my very first time this past Tuesday using the Sierra Chart platform. When one selects Sierra Chart as their platform of choice when initially setting up the Combine, TST provides account details for …
. TST resolved the issue by moving their user to Rithmic, by the way.) There are some links in that post pointing to the Sierra Chart support board that indicates SC is divorcing from CTS, basically, and not just for T Notes.
I haven't kept up on this, but it is interesting to me as an SC user who often goes into a TST Combine, which in the past has meant that you could only use CTS. It alarmed me to read, in other threads, of supposed issues with CTS making SC want to walk away from them.
I checked the TST website yesterday, and TST now connects SC users to Righmic. No mention of CTS. I'm not certain when this happened, but there have been intimations of it for some time.
In the post cited above by @VincentVega, the SC user they were replying to uses Cunningham to clear, which is the "C" in CTS, so he/she probably doesn't have a lot of choice. I'm assuming that SC will continue to make the CTS connection available when their customers need or want it.
This makes sense, and it lets everybody else move on.