understanding SC cumulative delta studies - futures io
futures io futures trading



understanding SC cumulative delta studies


Discussion in Sierra Chart

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one tomgilb with 1 posts (6 thanks)
    2. looks_two canoe with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 JonnyBoy with 1 posts (2 thanks)
    4. looks_4 johnEdweeno with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    1. trending_up 2,246 views
    2. thumb_up 9 thanks given
    3. group 5 followers
    1. forum 3 posts
    2. attach_file 1 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

understanding SC cumulative delta studies

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
yongin, south korea
 
 
Posts: 2 since Aug 2015
Thanks: 2 given, 1 received

Sierrachart has 2 different cumulative delta studies:

1) Cumulative Delta Bars - Volume
2) Cumulative Delta Bars - Up Down Tick Volume

1) is the diff b/w bid and ask volume. I think it's safe to say 1) is what we're mostly thinking when we hear the term "cumulative delta."

2) is the diff b/w uptick vol and downtick vol.

I have read the documentation and understand how it is calculated. What I need help on is trying to understand how to interpret 2) in relation to 1). I don't understand why anyone would use 2) which makes me think I'm blind to the significance of calculating delta via uptickvol-downtickvol.

Why would anyone use updown tick volume cumulative delta? Is it mostly used in spot forex where there is no bid-ask volume data?

Reply With Quote

Journal Challenge February 2021 results (so far):
Competing for $1500 in prizes from Topstep
looks_oneSBtrader82 's Trading Journalby SBtrader82
(169 thanks from 31 posts)
looks_twoJust BEING a Trader: Letting Go!!by iqgod
(116 thanks from 33 posts)
looks_3Wisdom is Emptinessby Mtype
(68 thanks from 25 posts)
looks_4Deetee’s DAX Trading Journal (time based)by Deetee
(31 thanks from 17 posts)
looks_5Journal for peanuts1956by peanuts1956
(23 thanks from 13 posts)
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #2 (permalink)
Nashville TN USA
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: SierraChart
Broker: Sierra Futures/SC Denali
Trading: NQ ES YM
 
Posts: 409 since Nov 2009
Thanks: 166 given, 505 received

One reason to use the Cumulative Delta Bars - Up/Down Tick Volume study it to get a more accurate representation of the cumulative delta of the ask/bid. This discrepancy occurs when the data provider does a poor job of recording whether the trade occurred at the ask or the bid.

In the pic below, the upper panel is the Cumulative Delta Bars - Volume of IQ Feed data.
The middle panel is panel is the Cumulative Delta Bars - Volume of Trading Technologies data.
The lower panel is the Cumulative Delta Bars - Up/Down Tick Volume of Trading Technologies data.

Note the similarity of the upper and lower panels, and the dissimilar middle panel.
I used an extreme example to make a point but since IQ Feed is known for it's ask/bid accuracy, using the Cumulative Delta Bars - Up/Down Tick Volume study is a way to overcome poor ask/bid accuracy.

Reply With Quote
The following 6 users say Thank You to tomgilb for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #3 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Montreal, Quebec
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader 8
Broker: Kinetick
Trading: ES
 
JonnyBoy's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,559 since Apr 2012
Thanks: 706 given, 3,726 received



canoe View Post
Sierrachart has 2 different cumulative delta studies:

1) Cumulative Delta Bars - Volume
2) Cumulative Delta Bars - Up Down Tick Volume

1) is the diff b/w bid and ask volume. I think it's safe to say 1) is what we're mostly thinking when we hear the term "cumulative delta."

2) is the diff b/w uptick vol and downtick vol.

I have read the documentation and understand how it is calculated. What I need help on is trying to understand how to interpret 2) in relation to 1). I don't understand why anyone would use 2) which makes me think I'm blind to the significance of calculating delta via uptickvol-downtickvol.

Why would anyone use updown tick volume cumulative delta? Is it mostly used in spot forex where there is no bid-ask volume data?

It does not make sense to look at both uptick/downtick volume and bid/ask volume in parallel. In fact the uptick/downtick volume method is typically viewed as an approximation of the bid/ask method.

Historically with NT7 (not sure about SC), the bid and ask traded volume was not available in an orderly fashion. The reason was the time stamp granularity of 1 second that was imposed by NinjaTrader, so it made it impossible to synchronize order book data with trade data.

This resulted in the bid and ask traded volume only being available in real-time. You would need the chart to fill with live data until a sufficient number of bars was available but everything would disappear again when pressing F5 or adding a new indicator. Again, I am not sure about SC.

Therefore the uptick/downtick with continuation method was used, which allowed approximating the genuine delta by using historical / real-time data. The uptick/downtick continuation is between 75% to 85% accurate, which is probably good enough for trading.

You can therefore either use the uptick/downtick with continuation method (requires trade data only) or use the bid and ask traded volume method (requires both trade data and level 1 order book data)

The two methods should not be used together as there is no benefit, just adds to the confusion.

--------------------------------------------------------
- Trade what you see. Invest in what you believe -
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to JonnyBoy for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #4 (permalink)
brisbane queensland australia
 
Experience: None
Platform: multichart
Trading: currency futures
 
Posts: 55 since Oct 2018
Thanks: 0 given, 5 received


JonnyBoy View Post
It does not make sense to look at both uptick/downtick volume and bid/ask volume in parallel. In fact the uptick/downtick volume method is typically viewed as an approximation of the bid/ask method.

Historically with NT7 (not sure about SC), the bid and ask traded volume was not available in an orderly fashion. The reason was the time stamp granularity of 1 second that was imposed by NinjaTrader, so it made it impossible to synchronize order book data with trade data.

This resulted in the bid and ask traded volume only being available in real-time. You would need the chart to fill with live data until a sufficient number of bars was available but everything would disappear again when pressing F5 or adding a new indicator. Again, I am not sure about SC.

Therefore the uptick/downtick with continuation method was used, which allowed approximating the genuine delta by using historical / real-time data. The uptick/downtick continuation is between 75% to 85% accurate, which is probably good enough for trading.

You can therefore either use the uptick/downtick with continuation method (requires trade data only) or use the bid and ask traded volume method (requires both trade data and level 1 order book data)

The two methods should not be used together as there is no benefit, just adds to the confusion.

For eurusd and other spot fx symbols i see a big difference between cumulative delta up/down tick bars and cumulative delta volume bars. But the latter one seems to match the corresponding CME futures symbol (E6) more closely. Perhaps that indicates its the more accurate one?

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to johnEdweeno for this post:


futures io Trading Community Platforms and Indicators Sierra Chart > understanding SC cumulative delta studies


Last Updated on February 10, 2019


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing
 

Journal Challenge w/$1500 prizes from Topstep!

February
 

Battlestations! Show us your trading desk - $1,500 in prizes!

March
 

Call Option Buying: The New Pain Trade? w/Carley Garner

Elite only
     



Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts