NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





And what about SierraChart


Discussion in Sierra Chart

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 56 posts (20 thanks)
    2. looks_two lolu with 51 posts (5 thanks)
    3. looks_3 LukeGeniol with 45 posts (26 thanks)
    4. looks_4 cory with 40 posts (26 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one aslan with 0.9 thanks per post
    2. looks_two cory with 0.7 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 chrislb with 0.7 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 LukeGeniol with 0.6 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 131,574 views
    2. thumb_up 259 thanks given
    3. group 37 followers
    1. forum 466 posts
    2. attach_file 83 attachments




Closed Thread
 
Search this Thread

And what about SierraChart

  #451 (permalink)
 
LukeGeniol's Avatar
 LukeGeniol 
Italy (IT) Italy
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: ATAS, R|Trader, NT8
Broker: Rithmic
Trading: CL, Brent, GC, TF
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 1,499 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 408
Thanks Received: 985


TonyB View Post
LukeGeniol, that is helpful, thank you. If you use SC to trade options (via TDA), please do share your experiences.

This seems to be another reason to keep TDA... I'm guessing no complex order entry would be possible though, but I clearly need to get this started. If I can make SC work for my options trading, I'd be quite happy.

I'm surprised TDA has not purchased SC yet. Sort of hope they don't...


I don't trade options and i don't know much to help you, anyway i think since SC is not a platform developed to trade options, you have to play with to see if you can customize it thru the tools it offers to see if you can make it works for your purpose.

Take your Pips, go out and Live.
Luke.
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Ninja Mobile Trader VPS (ninjamobiletrader.com)
Trading Reviews and Vendors
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
Are there any eval firms that allow you to sink to your …
Traders Hideout
Online prop firm The Funded Trader (TFT) going under?
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
59 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
37 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
22 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
22 thanks
The Program
20 thanks
  #452 (permalink)
 
TonyB's Avatar
 TonyB 
Bay Area, CA - US
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TOS, TS & MC
Broker: TDA & TS
Trading: Stock, Options and now Futures (ES)
Posts: 516 since Dec 2010
Thanks Given: 227
Thanks Received: 140

I searched this 45 page thread for the word "portfolio", and got no hits. So maybe I'm not thinking of the right descriptive...

When I have a strategy, I like to backtest it against a basket of stocks / ETF's, one's that I have pre-qualified. I believe this is called portfolio backtesting, by some at least.

Is this currently available with SC? If it is not, are there plans to add such functionality? I also searched the SC forum, albeit somewhat briefly, and didn't find anything on this matter.

This form of backtesting is pretty important to me, so if not available on SC, the decision becomes an easy one.

That said, if SC is the platform for me, I'd most likely be going with Optimus Trading Group. "mattz" reached-out to me and got me squared away with a Rithmic connection to play with. Pretty cool.

From a pricing perspective alone, I was pulling for SC over MC. They each seem very worthy. Someone please tell me SC can backtest a group of stocks. I currently use Prodigio for this task...

  #453 (permalink)
 
TonyB's Avatar
 TonyB 
Bay Area, CA - US
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TOS, TS & MC
Broker: TDA & TS
Trading: Stock, Options and now Futures (ES)
Posts: 516 since Dec 2010
Thanks Given: 227
Thanks Received: 140



LukeGeniol View Post
I don't trade options and i don't know much to help you, anyway i think since SC is not a platform developed to trade options, you have to play with to see if you can customize it thru the tools it offers to see if you can make it works for your purpose.

Between options not being an integral part of SC and what seems to be no portfolio backtesting, I am at peace with making my decision. This discussion was most helpful and educational. Thank you.

  #454 (permalink)
 
LukeGeniol's Avatar
 LukeGeniol 
Italy (IT) Italy
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: ATAS, R|Trader, NT8
Broker: Rithmic
Trading: CL, Brent, GC, TF
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 1,499 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 408
Thanks Received: 985


TonyB View Post
Between options not being an integral part of SC and what seems to be no portfolio backtesting, I am at peace with making my decision. This discussion was most helpful and educational. Thank you.

I think you cand do multiple chart backtesting, but is not so simple, you have to play with worksheets, or programming on C++.
Sierra Chart - Replaying Charts
Sierra Chart - Worksheet Systems, Alerts and Automated Trading
Sierra Chart - Referencing More Than One Chart In Your Worksheet Formulas
Sierra Chart - Automated Trading From an Advanced Custom Study


I think @ aslan and @tomgilb could be more informative than me on this.

Take your Pips, go out and Live.
Luke.
  #455 (permalink)
 
aslan's Avatar
 aslan 
Madison, WI
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: ALT
Trading: ES
Posts: 625 since Jan 2010
Thanks Given: 356
Thanks Received: 1,127


TonyB View Post
Mike, being respectful of the topic, might you be able to briefly explain your reasoning for seeking-out another broker, even though IB handles it all?

More back on topic... I never realized it, but SC does not handle options, on stock or futures. If wrong, please correct me. It's my understanding that MC does. I actually like ToS quite a bit for options, but it was my hope to have the platform handle all instruments of interest. While I can accept not having one broker do it all, I'd much rather prefer not compromise that thinking with respect to the platform. Geez, this is not easy...

In terms of IB, most people say run because their data feed is a POS. While that is true, IB is actually a good execution platform as it does handle all of the instruments, and I can trade multiple accounts from one TWS instance (i.e. regular accounts, ira, roth, wifes account, kids account, etc.). SC has the IB multiple account support in there, but I have not really played with it yet. At the end of the day, I have been happy with IB over the years, but do not use it for day trading or as a feed.

On the options front, I do not use SC for that. It is hard enough to find a single platform for futures, let alone stocks and options. As others have pointed out, SC may support options in some capacity.

  #456 (permalink)
 
cory's Avatar
 cory 
virginia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: ninja
Trading: NQ
Posts: 6,098 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 877
Thanks Received: 8,090


TonyB View Post
Cory, ToS does seem to do options quite well. Do you happen to have experience with options in SC or MC, for comparison?

each software is good for certain task. back testing TS, option TOS, equities/futures Esignal , future SC or Ninja. This is based on my own experience. You may also want to open accounts with Fidelity, Etrade, TDA and Schwab as they all try to be all thing to all people.

Thanked by:
  #457 (permalink)
 
mattz's Avatar
 mattz   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 2,493 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 2,440
Thanks Received: 3,789


cory View Post
each software is good for certain task. back testing TS, option TOS, equities/futures Esignal , future SC or Ninja. This is based on my own experience. .

Well said!

M

Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected]
  #458 (permalink)
 Sawtooth 
Prescott AZ USA
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: SierraChart
Broker: Stage5, FCM:Dorman, Data:Denali, Routing:Teton
Trading: YM ES NQ
Posts: 474 since Nov 2009
Thanks Given: 219
Thanks Received: 603


TonyB View Post
1) If I recall correctly, if I were to get SC free via one of these, I will not have the choice to connect to another broker, correct? If true, then I won't be able to trade stocks and options through SC, and that would a deal breaker for me. I would probably still get SC, just source it directly myself, or try find another broker who offers it, but that also does more than futures. There seems to be none though...

2) Thanks for the link to the backtesting documentation. If you have been using it, have you been happy with the results?

1) If you are not trading from different brokers concurrently, you can switch back and forth between brokers in the same instance of SC just by choosing the other broker in the Data/Trade Service Settings. SC remembers your parameters for each. SC also allows multiple instances for no extra charge so you could run 2 or more as needed.
Not sure if the broker-supplied SC will do all of this, but I prefer to have a separate account with SC, even though I could get it for free from Velocity, because I want the ability to ask SC Support for help on SC specific things. If you have the broker-supplied version, it is expected that most of your support for SC is through your broker, and I don't expect my broker to know the inner-workings of Sierra.

2) I have used SC's backtesting primarily for worksheet autotrading systems. It works fine, and you can set the replay speed up to 100,000 times normal. I've not used that speed because my computer video lurches at trying to keep up. Also, there is no way to skip over periods when your autotrading system is disabled, even though you need those sessions times for the indicators you are using. Overall, I'm happy with it.

Thanked by:
  #459 (permalink)
 
aslan's Avatar
 aslan 
Madison, WI
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: ALT
Trading: ES
Posts: 625 since Jan 2010
Thanks Given: 356
Thanks Received: 1,127


tomgilb View Post
1) If you are not trading from different brokers concurrently, you can switch back and forth between brokers in the same instance of SC just by choosing the other broker in the Data/Trade Service Settings. SC remembers your parameters for each. SC also allows multiple instances for no extra charge so you could run 2 or more as needed.
Not sure if the broker-supplied SC will do all of this, but I prefer to have a separate account with SC, even though I could get it for free from Velocity, because I want the ability to ask SC Support for help on SC specific things. If you have the broker-supplied version, it is expected that most of your support for SC is through your broker, and I don't expect my broker to know the inner-workings of Sierra.

I could get free version of SC from Optimus, but I also pay for it myself because I want to know that I can do what I want when I want. I run 2-4 copies of SC depending what I am doing, and have no issues connecting to multiple brokers and feeds. At the end of the day, SC is so cheap its kind of a non issue. If you are starting out, by all means use the free version. Also, I do agree that you might get better SC support if you are a paying user vs a broker user, but that is when the quality of your broker matters.

BTW, all of those SC copies run in less memory and less CPU than POS 7.04.0.0B.2 ever did

Thanked by:
  #460 (permalink)
 
TonyB's Avatar
 TonyB 
Bay Area, CA - US
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TOS, TS & MC
Broker: TDA & TS
Trading: Stock, Options and now Futures (ES)
Posts: 516 since Dec 2010
Thanks Given: 227
Thanks Received: 140



tomgilb View Post
1) If you are not trading from different brokers concurrently, you can switch back and forth between brokers in the same instance of SC just by choosing the other broker in the Data/Trade Service Settings. SC remembers your parameters for each. SC also allows multiple instances for no extra charge so you could run 2 or more as needed.
Not sure if the broker-supplied SC will do all of this, but I prefer to have a separate account with SC, even though I could get it for free from Velocity, because I want the ability to ask SC Support for help on SC specific things. If you have the broker-supplied version, it is expected that most of your support for SC is through your broker, and I don't expect my broker to know the inner-workings of Sierra.

2) I have used SC's backtesting primarily for worksheet autotrading systems. It works fine, and you can set the replay speed up to 100,000 times normal. I've not used that speed because my computer video lurches at trying to keep up. Also, there is no way to skip over periods when your autotrading system is disabled, even though you need those sessions times for the indicators you are using. Overall, I'm happy with it.

Your bring up good points. While it is nice to save some money getting the platform through a broker, this might not always be desirable. SC is a very appealing option and I must say that I feel good no matter decision I ultimately make here (SC vs MC). As far a support goes, I would think that between the forum here and that of SC's, almost all matters can be addressed, if the broker is ill-equipped to do so. Maybe I'm wrong on that though, but that would be my guess...

Here's a very general example of how I backtest and I'd be curious to know how SC would handle it, if at all. I have a list of about 500 stocks / ETF's that I've qualified as meriting my attention, but only under certain technical conditions, as spelled-out in the strat. So, if we are talking a daily strat, after mkt close, I'll run it against this "portfolio" of symbols to see if there any hits. The strat might be rather basic but could say, identify all that were oversold via RSI below 25, that just crossed above RSI 25, where Chaikin MF has been increasing. Possibly a bullish engulfing candle too... You get the picture. I'd run such a saved strat in the evening to id opportunities for possible stock and / or option responses. I currently do this in Prodigio. It has it's quirky problems though.

Would I be able to do something like this with SC?


Closed Thread



Last Updated on July 24, 2011


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts