NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Sierra vs. Ninja : why I chose .....


Discussion in Sierra Chart

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one josh with 33 posts (73 thanks)
    2. looks_two Futures Operator with 24 posts (2 thanks)
    3. looks_3 LaissezFaire with 16 posts (13 thanks)
    4. looks_4 SierraChart with 16 posts (29 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Rrrracer with 4 thanks per post
    2. looks_two bobwest with 2.8 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 josh with 2.2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 SierraChart with 1.8 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 104,594 views
    2. thumb_up 314 thanks given
    3. group 60 followers
    1. forum 213 posts
    2. attach_file 18 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Sierra vs. Ninja : why I chose .....

  #131 (permalink)
Fraois
Hsinchu, Taiwan
 
Posts: 5 since Aug 2013
Thanks Given: 3
Thanks Received: 0

Glad to hear Sierra is adding the "real-time" function, indeed more friendly for automated traders
I guess it would work by assigning a full core of CPU to the master copy and streaming feeds to slaves.
Sierra Chart uses only one core for feed updating but does the same applies to order generation process?

Also anyone knows how fast C++ based Sierra is
- Price feed latency?
- Copying latency from master to slaves? (I guess no latency here)
- Order generation latency?

Any information given would be valuable, experience or pure estimation

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
Increase in trading performance by 75%
The Elite Circle
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
34 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
16 thanks
My NQ Trading Journal
14 thanks
Vinny E-Mini & Algobox Review TRADE ROOM
13 thanks
  #132 (permalink)
Fraois
Hsinchu, Taiwan
 
Posts: 5 since Aug 2013
Thanks Given: 3
Thanks Received: 0


SierraChart View Post
Interesting this question is being asked now.

We are adding a new flag to the Sierra Chart advanced custom study and trading system interface (ACSIL), to cause the study function to be called immediately on every trade and order update. This will allow the trading system to react to new market data and order updates.

The should be used with caution though because it will increase CPU load.

Do I get faster when I run multiple slaves with each hosting only one automated system? Or no need to do that cause Sierra Chart is multithreaded and optimized for multiple cores?
Does SC allow hedging on Currenex?

Hedging is quite useful without closing an order fist and then opening another and more friendly for coders as well. I'm glad not being a US citizen and not governed by NFA.
It's amazing that SC seems to have a nice FIX engine without running a FIX API and criticizing the popular Quick FIX to be overheaded. I haven't purchased Sierra yet, but it looks promising

Reply With Quote
  #133 (permalink)
 
SierraChart's Avatar
 SierraChart 
New Zealand
 
Experience: Master
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Numerous
Trading: NONE
Posts: 114 since Feb 2011
Thanks Given: 4
Thanks Received: 243


Market data processing, order processing, and study calculations are all done within the same thread. However all of this is very fast.


Also anyone knows how fast C++ based Sierra is

- Price feed latency?

This is extremely fast processing. We have not measured it, but we have no reason to believe that this would take any longer than 10 microseconds to process a market data update for a single symbol especially when using SSD drives. We probably should test this, there is a good chance it is even faster. Market data processing, is of very little overhead.

- Copying latency from master to slaves? (I guess no latency here)

This is also very fast. In the microsecond range.

- Order generation latency?

This is also very fast. In the microsecond range.

We would expect the overall time from processing a market data update, calling the study function and the study function submitting an order, might take something like 100 microseconds. Could be longer could be faster. There are many variables. As we said, we have not analyzed this completely. And we are working on reducing the time further.

Sierra Chart does not support hedging with Currenex.

The Sierra Chart FIX engine is monumentally faster than quick fix.

Reply With Quote
  #134 (permalink)
Fraois
Hsinchu, Taiwan
 
Posts: 5 since Aug 2013
Thanks Given: 3
Thanks Received: 0


SierraChart View Post
Market data processing, order processing, and study calculations are all done within the same thread. However all of this is very fast.
Sierra Chart does not support hedging with Currenex.
The Sierra Chart FIX engine is monumentally faster than quick fix.

The minimum system requirement for running one instance of Sierra Chart is very low, should I run different automated systems on different copies of Sierra Chart? Does it do any good?
Should I assign different CPU cores to run different copies or it can choose a CPU by itself?
When will be the real-time tick by tick feed update version be available?

Reply With Quote
  #135 (permalink)
 
Massive l's Avatar
 Massive l 
OR/USA
Legendary /NQ Trader
 
Experience: None
Posts: 2,129 since Mar 2011
Thanks Given: 1,859
Thanks Received: 5,106

wow, that's awesome! Do ToS next to NT and Sierra

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #136 (permalink)
Fraois
Hsinchu, Taiwan
 
Posts: 5 since Aug 2013
Thanks Given: 3
Thanks Received: 0


SierraChart View Post
Sierra Chart does not support hedging with Currenex.

Since it does not support hedging, what happens when running two automated systems on one copy of Sierra Chart and say they happened to buy and sell at the same time with the same asset?

If it works fine, will the stop orders be on the broker's side or trader's side?

Reply With Quote
  #137 (permalink)
 
Jonson's Avatar
 Jonson 
Russia, St.Petersburg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, CQG Desktop
Broker: NinjaTrader/CQG
Trading: Futures
Posts: 247 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 218
Thanks Received: 118

SC volume by price better than Gomi volume ladder for NT, and also faster and more accurately than any other platform that I tested (NT, MD, MC)

* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
Reply With Quote
  #138 (permalink)
 
puma's Avatar
 puma 
zurich
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra ahRrrr CQG ...
Trading: Bund, ES, ...
Posts: 964 since Aug 2010
Thanks Given: 7,273
Thanks Received: 1,507

to me Sierra is far superior to Ninja.

Sierra has a multitude more functions and features.

most are hidden though.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #139 (permalink)
 ejtrader 
Portland, OR
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart
Trading: ES
Posts: 269 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 327
Thanks Received: 180

@SierraChart - Thanks for considering this function. Would you please suggest - which version is going to have this option?

Thanks


SierraChart View Post
Interesting this question is being asked now.

We are adding a new flag to the Sierra Chart advanced custom study and trading system interface (ACSIL), to cause the study function to be called immediately on every trade and order update. This will allow the trading system to react to new market data and order updates.

The should be used with caution though because it will increase CPU load.


Reply With Quote
  #140 (permalink)
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 trendisyourfriend 
Quebec Canada
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 4,527 since Oct 2009
Thanks Given: 4,175
Thanks Received: 6,020


I'd like to ask. Is there someone equivalent to @Fat Tails that develops free indicators and is as generous for the Sierra community?

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on May 23, 2023


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts