Volume Breakdown and Bid/Ask Difference studies - Sierra Chart Programming | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Volume Breakdown and Bid/Ask Difference studies
Updated: Views / Replies:31,396 / 82
Created: by lolu Attachments:15

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 15  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Volume Breakdown and Bid/Ask Difference studies

  #11 (permalink)
Trading for Fun
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: SierraChart
Broker/Data: Velocity/TT
Favorite Futures: 6E,6B,YM
 
Posts: 54 since Jul 2009
Thanks: 6 given, 30 received

I use version 589. So you should download new prerelease version.
I also updated my chartbook, because not shure if it was saved.

Reply With Quote
 
  #12 (permalink)
Elite Member
Lagos, Nigeria
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader, SierraChart
Favorite Futures: Euro Currency & Oil
 
lolu's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,440 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 1,000 given, 1,595 received


chrislb View Post
I use version 589. So you should download new prerelease version.
I also updated my chartbook, because not shure if it was saved.

Is 589 not still in Beta ? SC calls beta, pre-release, I want to believe.

Lolu

Reply With Quote
 
  #13 (permalink)
Just starting out...
New York, NY
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Charts
Broker/Data: IB/Barcharts
Favorite Futures: ES
 
Posts: 11 since Mar 2010
Thanks: 0 given, 2 received


Thanks Chris & Lolu for the re-directs. I'm in same boat as Chris in deciding on an optimal Sierra layout (hopefully that will replicate my previous office platform) and it's a bit of a pain, esp. as on Sierra forum there's little consistancy on terminology ('cumulative bid-ask' means the net of a period's Ask-Bid Volume -- what I had heretofore called 'Delta' -- and at other times means the day's running total of this number). Anyway, here's another possible layout I'm trying to implement (if you like numbers) as it saves screen space. Let me know if you have any ideas. I'll ask Admin, but probably will have to use Workbook. Cheers. Oh yeah, Chris in your screenshot -- I think it was post 5 -- are the white bars meant to track the range of the period's AskVol-BidVol? They look symmetrical. Thanks.

Attached Thumbnails
Volume Breakdown and Bid/Ask Difference studies-volume-breakdown-numeric3.jpg  
Reply With Quote
 
  #14 (permalink)
Elite Member
Austin, TX & Las Vegas, NV
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Investor RT Pro, NT 7.0
Favorite Futures: ES, DAX, CL, 6E
 
FulcrumTrader's Avatar
 
Posts: 230 since Mar 2010
Thanks: 32 given, 286 received

Just curious.....what feed are you all using with your SC charting for BID/ASK differential work?


TIA!

Reply With Quote
 
  #15 (permalink)
Trading for Fun
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: SierraChart
Broker/Data: Velocity/TT
Favorite Futures: 6E,6B,YM
 
Posts: 54 since Jul 2009
Thanks: 6 given, 30 received


lolu View Post
Is 589 not still in Beta ? SC calls beta, pre-release, I want to believe.

I always use the latest version, and except one time, when they had overwritten the sierra.cfg file, I never had problems.


Quoting 
Oh yeah, Chris in your screenshot -- I think it was post 5 -- are the white bars meant to track the range of the period's AskVol-BidVol? They look symmetrical. Thanks.

The white lines are ask/bid volume overlayed by delta with the "BidVolume vs. AskVolume" study. They are not symmetrical, it just might look like, but as you know the delta compared to the ask/bid volume is small, so it is a matter of scale.


Quoting 
Just curious.....what feed are you all using with your SC charting for BID/ASK differential work?

For the time being I have to use TA feed, which after comparing to MD at the EL blog, is pretty close, but it seems to me, the demo feed is aggregated. But I hope that I can use the TT feed in the near future, SC promised to implement it hopefully in April.

Reply With Quote
 
  #16 (permalink)
Elite Member
Lagos, Nigeria
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader, SierraChart
Favorite Futures: Euro Currency & Oil
 
lolu's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,440 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 1,000 given, 1,595 received


chrislb View Post
I always use the latest version, and except one time, when they had overwritten the sierra.cfg file, I never had problems.

chris,

I'm on a LIVE account with TransAct, so I'll want to stick to version 580 until SC pronounces 589 stable.

Does version 589 have a process of saving chartbooks to version 580 (or lower) format ? If Yes, could you do this to the 6e.cht and re-post it.

Lolu

Reply With Quote
 
  #17 (permalink)
Elite Member
Lagos, Nigeria
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader, SierraChart
Favorite Futures: Euro Currency & Oil
 
lolu's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,440 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 1,000 given, 1,595 received


FulcrumTrader View Post
Just curious.....what feed are you all using with your SC charting for BID/ASK differential work?


TIA!

See post #1 of My Trading Diary.

TransAct has three modes of accounts, viz, Demo Mode, Simulated Live, and Live Mode. The Simulated Live and Live Mode have the same data-feed server(s). I have a Live account and was also setup for the Simulated Live account (for SIM-trading) both on only one account. The Demo Mode may have a different data-feed server(s). All the servers could be in the same Data Center, but the server(s) for the Live modes would be given a higher priority in service delivery.

Lolu

Reply With Quote
 
  #18 (permalink)
Trading for Fun
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: SierraChart
Broker/Data: Velocity/TT
Favorite Futures: 6E,6B,YM
 
Posts: 54 since Jul 2009
Thanks: 6 given, 30 received


lolu View Post
chris,

I'm on a LIVE account with TransAct, so I'll want to stick to version 580 until SC pronounces 589 stable.
Lolu

You can add another instance of SC by creating a copy of the SC folder, then you update, and start SC from there. So you can test the new version independent from your live version. Check on the SC support board.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to chrislb for this post:
 
  #19 (permalink)
Elite Member
Austin, TX & Las Vegas, NV
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Investor RT Pro, NT 7.0
Favorite Futures: ES, DAX, CL, 6E
 
FulcrumTrader's Avatar
 
Posts: 230 since Mar 2010
Thanks: 32 given, 286 received


lolu View Post
See post #1 of My Trading Diary.

TransAct has three modes of accounts, viz, Demo Mode, Simulated Live, and Live Mode. The Simulated Live and Live Mode have the same data-feed server(s). I have a Live account and was also setup for the Simulated Live account (for SIM-trading) both on only one account. The Demo Mode may have a different data-feed server(s). All the servers could be in the same Data Center, but the server(s) for the Live modes would be given a higher priority in service delivery.

Lolu

OK.....just wanted to let you know that Transact feed is unusable for proper BID/ASK differential work of any kind. The ONLY feed I am using at this time for all my BID/ASK differential work is DTN.IQ feed. I have tracked and used Cumulative Delta now for over 7 years and at this time all the various broker supplied feeds are all showing data losses (as compared to DTN.IQ feed which has been verified against a high end professional feed). The following feeds are all showing consistent data loss problems for BID/ASK differential uses;

OEC
Transact
Zenfire/Rithmic
TT Fix Adapter (can work, but only with very robust hardware/software)
IB (complete junk "snapshot" data)
Tradestation (timestamps are a mess, etc, etc, etc....LOL!)

I don't even use Esignal either.....have no clue why they even at times can't match DTN.IQ feed daily runs of BID/ASK data. CQG feeds is usable so that is also an option.

DTN.IQ put a lot of money into their data feed infrastructure last year ahead of the CME data output increases on October 5th, 2009. The CME data feed "per unit of time increase" changes really caused a lot of problems for all these various feeds that I have mentioned with problems. Fortunately for those dependent on clean BID/ASK differential data, DTN.IQ is working out exceptionally well as I continue to watch it like a hawk.

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to FulcrumTrader for this post:
 
  #20 (permalink)
Elite Member
san ramon
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: ninja
Broker/Data: zen
Favorite Futures: es, 6e
 
Posts: 136 since Oct 2009
Thanks: 98 given, 73 received


Hi FulcrumTrader........I was wondering if you can elaborate what sort of data discrepancy you found when comparing different data feeds to DTN.IQ........are we talking black and white or shades of gray.........

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > > Volume Breakdown and Bid/Ask Difference studies

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Jigsaw Trading: TBA

Elite only

FuturesTrader71: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

Jan 18

RandBots: TBA

Jan 23

GFF Brokers & CME Group: Futures & Bitcoin

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analysis and comparison on different data Feeds and Platforms for Bid/Ask Studies LukeGeniol The Elite Circle 477 December 13th, 2015 01:41 PM
Volume Breakdown and Cumulative Delta cleon EasyLanguage Programming 8 November 9th, 2014 06:12 AM
Difference between ask, bid and trade quote in IQFeed forexboom Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 2 June 4th, 2011 08:20 AM
Volume breakdown indicator mysthars The Elite Circle 107 December 13th, 2010 03:16 PM
Question about Bid/Ask studies and Delta neko333 The Elite Circle 4 September 23rd, 2010 03:06 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 AM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-18 in 0.14 seconds with 20 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.163.209.109