NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





FairX is launching soon


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one FuturesTrader71 with 7 posts (20 thanks)
    2. looks_two SMCJB with 3 posts (6 thanks)
    3. looks_3 FuManChou with 2 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Tradovate with 1 posts (0 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one bobwest with 3 thanks per post
    2. looks_two FuturesTrader71 with 2.9 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 SMCJB with 2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 FuManChou with 0.5 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 4,185 views
    2. thumb_up 31 thanks given
    3. group 8 followers
    1. forum 15 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

FairX is launching soon

  #11 (permalink)
 
SMCJB's Avatar
 SMCJB 
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT and Stellar
Broker: Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,049 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,388
Thanks Received: 10,207


xplorer View Post
Wouldn't that require the trader's consent?

I believe it's a regulatory requirement. Assuming so that would mean your option is to not to trade.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
Strategy stop orders partially filled
EasyLanguage Programming
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
 
  #12 (permalink)
 
FuturesTrader71's Avatar
 FuturesTrader71 
 
Posts: 391 since Feb 2012
Thanks Given: 174
Thanks Received: 1,514


FuManChou View Post
As a free market kind of person, it is always good to see more competition/options.

I am kind of worried that I might fall into the "Professional Trader" category by using MultiCharts automated trading. See C and D in the FairX fee schedule documentation (link below). Are we able to get clarification on what a fully automated order generating computer system is?


C. Not using a fully automated order generating computer system; and
D. Trading for its own account.


https://www.fairx.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/FairX_Fee_Schedule_6_2_21.pdf

Hi FuManChou!

I've got good news for you and all professional traders. The fee schedule at FairX has been updated to bring in flat pricing as a result of our discussions. Really appreciate how responsive the team at FairX is.

Here's the new fee schedule:


Risk Disclaimer: Trading Futures is not suitable for all investors. Past Performance is not indicative of future results.

If you have any questions about the products or services provided, please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io " Ask Me Anything" thread
Follow me on Twitter Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #13 (permalink)
 
FuturesTrader71's Avatar
 FuturesTrader71 
 
Posts: 391 since Feb 2012
Thanks Given: 174
Thanks Received: 1,514



Ghappy21 View Post
How does FairX and FMCs create profit? Everything can't simply be free?

They are being innovative. To me, as long as they don't charge for market data which is generated by the participants, then I don't really care. They get an exchange fee for the product.

However, until December 31, 2021, there is a program through which traders can trade it completely free. Will provide details with Big Mike's permission once those are available later this week.

Risk Disclaimer: Trading Futures is not suitable for all investors. Past Performance is not indicative of future results.

If you have any questions about the products or services provided, please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io " Ask Me Anything" thread
Follow me on Twitter Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #14 (permalink)
 
FuturesTrader71's Avatar
 FuturesTrader71 
 
Posts: 391 since Feb 2012
Thanks Given: 174
Thanks Received: 1,514


SMCJB View Post
Making it super expensive to the people who provide the liquidity may make it hard to get liquidity!



There has been some discussion on this regarding CME's fees. I have heard rumors that CME is about classify autospreaders and any form of automation as an automated trading system and require anybody using them to pay the automated trading data fees of $1150 per user per exchange! While there are obviously many who think this is okay, step back and think. If they do change this, what happens to people who are automating trading with Tradestation, Ninja, SC etc.

Monthly Non-Display Category A-1
https://www.cmegroup.com/market-data/distributor/files/july-2019-fee-schedule-5.pdf


But is he a fully automated Trader?

I don't think they are making it super-expensive for market makers. They are on a different fee schedule. They are discouraging predatory algo types.

Yep....the price increases continue at CME. Again, we need to support this exchange. There are some interesting products coming down the pipe at FairX.

Risk Disclaimer: Trading Futures is not suitable for all investors. Past Performance is not indicative of future results.

If you have any questions about the products or services provided, please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io " Ask Me Anything" thread
Follow me on Twitter Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #15 (permalink)
 
FuturesTrader71's Avatar
 FuturesTrader71 
 
Posts: 391 since Feb 2012
Thanks Given: 174
Thanks Received: 1,514


bobwest View Post
I would say that it's really impossible for an exchange to tell if a trader is running an automated strategy on their computer. The orders look the same, right?

Now, if the orders are coming in at a rate that no human with a mouse could submit them, then it would be obvious that it's automated. Otherwise, not. So there would need to be established some measurement of trade frequency that is taken as the signature of "automated trading." But if your system took a few trades an hour, or day, or week, then it passes this test.

Are they actually interested in the high-frequency guys? They could just say so and clear things up.

Bob.

You are supposed to declare this as part of your user configuration (Tag 50) at the exchange through your FCM.

Risk Disclaimer: Trading Futures is not suitable for all investors. Past Performance is not indicative of future results.

If you have any questions about the products or services provided, please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io " Ask Me Anything" thread
Follow me on Twitter Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #16 (permalink)
 
FuturesTrader71's Avatar
 FuturesTrader71 
 
Posts: 391 since Feb 2012
Thanks Given: 174
Thanks Received: 1,514


SMCJB View Post
I believe it's a regulatory requirement. Assuming so that would mean your option is to not to trade.

Right. The FCM/broker is supposed to declare this. Many don't as a result of their normal processing (they don't stop and ask unless you are trading big volume).

Risk Disclaimer: Trading Futures is not suitable for all investors. Past Performance is not indicative of future results.

If you have any questions about the products or services provided, please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io " Ask Me Anything" thread
Follow me on Twitter Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on June 22, 2021


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts