NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Pro's and Con's: Adding to losers / Dollar Cost Averaging


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Rrrracer with 10 posts (35 thanks)
    2. looks_two MiniP with 8 posts (12 thanks)
    3. looks_3 bobwest with 7 posts (46 thanks)
    4. looks_4 xplorer with 5 posts (28 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one bobwest with 6.6 thanks per post
    2. looks_two xplorer with 5.6 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Rrrracer with 3.5 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 phantomtrader with 3.2 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 11,440 views
    2. thumb_up 239 thanks given
    3. group 24 followers
    1. forum 66 posts
    2. attach_file 3 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Pro's and Con's: Adding to losers / Dollar Cost Averaging

  #1 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,399 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,175
Thanks Received: 101,541

Hi guys,

Please vote and discuss in our latest poll:

Adding to a loser / dollar cost averaging?

Total votes: 529
 


What are the pro's and con's to adding to a losing position, or DCA / dollar cost averaging a position?

If you initially plan to scale in to a position, even if it goes against you, does that still count as adding to a loser or dollar cost averaging? Or since it is part of your plan to build a position, do you not consider that to be the case until after you've executed the complete trade and filled your entire position?

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Online prop firm The Funded Trader (TFT) going under?
Traders Hideout
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
New Micros: Ultra 10-Year & Ultra T-Bond -- Live Now
Treasury Notes and Bonds
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
60 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
41 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
24 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
22 thanks
The Program
19 thanks
  #3 (permalink)
 
MiniP's Avatar
 MiniP 
USA,USA
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: NinjaTrader Brokerage
Trading: ES,
Posts: 1,157 since May 2017
Thanks Given: 1,109
Thanks Received: 2,943


I personally would never "scale in"/ "add to a loser"... If I was so sure of the execution I would of added the size when I entered. To me once you start losing and then trying to add pos size all your doing is catching falling knives. Now I would add to a winning position in a trend EX: price is making new high's then I would see adding if we making a new HL but adding to losers has never been something I could fully understand.


-P

"Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie"-Miyamoto Musashi
Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4 (permalink)
 
amoeba's Avatar
 amoeba 
Sydney, NSW, Australia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart, Python, C#
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: MJNK, ASX, SPI
Posts: 205 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 98
Thanks Received: 284

For my discretionary trading I do not add to a losing position, but for some of my automated strategies I do incorporate scale-in even if losing.

Specific example would be; two entries both valid positive expectancy - 1st an entry at close of bar (breakout style) - 2nd an entry at a specific pullback value. Both are able to be traded on their own, but together offer a smoother equity curve. I suppose you could technically say it is two separate systems and not a scale-in, but it does push the total position size up.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #5 (permalink)
 
bobwest's Avatar
 bobwest 
Western Florida
Site Moderator
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Trading: ES, YM
Frequency: Several times daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 8,162 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 57,343
Thanks Received: 26,267

I think there are two separate issues here, and two actions that seem the same (because they are both adding to a position), but actually are very different:

1. Adding to a loser in the hope of turning it into less of a loss, or even a profit. This is pretty much a fear-based or denial-based action. We tend to get high-minded and moralistic lectures about not doing this, and probably it's a bad idea most of the time. The better idea is usually take your loss, realize it's a bad trade and don't make things worse.

2. Deliberately scaling in as a realistic strategy to improve your position in a good trade, whether the market is going against you in the short term or not. There are people who can actually do this, and part of what makes it possible for them is being able to identify when the trade is still good and when it is not. It also takes some capital and some nerve.

I know that option #2 exists because we (occasionally) see traders who are good at it. Inletcap did it all the time and made money. So did tigertrader and @Big Mike, back when he was trading and posting here. It's not the same as being unwilling to take a loss out of an emotional reaction, but is a thought-out, practiced strategy for getting into a trade. People who can do this do take their losses when the trade has been proven wrong, but they don't just use an adverse P/L as the only criterion, up to a point, at least.

For myself, I am too chicken, and also don't know how to do it, (and, honestly, am too likely to fall into category #1) and so I need to force myself to just close the thing and not let the loss continue. My basic point of view is also more to identify the trade and then reduce the amount of management I have to do. For me, too much thinking is already dangerous in a trade, and I don't want to add to my cognitive load. It's a matter of opting for simplicity.

So I voted for "Never scale-in, period." I don't think this is an absolute for all traders and all times, which it sounds like. I just don't think it's healthy, for me. If you can do it, power to you.

Bob.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 trendisyourfriend 
Quebec Canada
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 4,527 since Oct 2009
Thanks Given: 4,171
Thanks Received: 6,018


bobwest View Post
...
1. Adding to a loser in the hope of turning it into less of a loss, or even a profit. This is pretty much a fear-based or denial-based action...

Samething with the trader who places his stop loss just above or below the trigger bar since he is more at risk then the trader who places his stop loss at the right place.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #7 (permalink)
 
Blue Eagle's Avatar
 Blue Eagle 
vancouver British Columbia/Canada
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja Trader
Trading: CL
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 1,817 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 7,815
Thanks Received: 7,862

I never scale into scalp trades where the targets and stops are small...I am either right or wrong and that is clear quite quickly. With trades that are aiming at a significant move from one "area" to another "area" not scaling in requires a perfect entry within that area which is hard to do with bigger dogs lurking around who love to catch smaller fish off guard. That is how the above mentioned traders made money scaling in...they focused on an area that if it provided support or resistance meant that their thesis still held water and they were willing to add to it.

Given my tiny account I am willing to add a second contract as price moves against me a little but always have a line in the sand based on PA levels that tell me I am wrong. Why not just wait till it hits that line in the sand? Because it doesn't always get there... a good area for buying or selling attracts many traders and the line is not exact.

The difference between scaling in and adding to a loser is VERY clear when a person is engaging in it (and I have done both). Scaling in has a somewhat nervous but anticipatory feeling to it....adding to a loser feels like you're being chased by a bear and looking for a tree to climb...

Craig

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)
 
Skidboot's Avatar
 Skidboot 
Houston, TX
 
Posts: 202 since Dec 2010
Thanks Given: 203
Thanks Received: 299

I don’t think scaling logic applies the same way for all instruments. I like scaling into (short) VX futures when the volatility spikes keeping a close eye on the expiry. Also seasonal instruments like NG and Ags offer some decent opportunity for scaling in. On the other hand, stock index futures are my nightmare for scaling in. Just my 2 cents...

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #9 (permalink)
 
MiniP's Avatar
 MiniP 
USA,USA
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: NinjaTrader Brokerage
Trading: ES,
Posts: 1,157 since May 2017
Thanks Given: 1,109
Thanks Received: 2,943


trendisyourfriend View Post
Samething with the trader who places his stop loss just above or below the trigger bar since he is more at risk then the trader who places his stop loss at the right place.

I do this once I am up X amount of points due to the fact if we reverse this far then It would be wise to GTFO
Original s/l is normally near a swing point


0.02


-P

"Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie"-Miyamoto Musashi
Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #10 (permalink)
 
wldman's Avatar
 wldman 
Chicago Illinois USA
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Broker: IB, ToS
Trading: /ES, US Equities/Options
Frequency: Several times daily
Duration: Hours
Posts: 3,507 since Aug 2011
Thanks Given: 2,046
Thanks Received: 9,491


that really begs clarification.

Adding to a loser in a trading time frame, especially based on the original indication is a certain loser. If you "make" on the trade, the loss is that you reinforced a shit entry. Your method or your execution were still faulty and now you have "data" to support doing it again.

Conversely, pressing a winner, especially on subsequent new trade signals is absolutely critical, unfortunately it is often very difficult to learn and implement.

Most people, until they are extremely prolific, nurture their losers and kill their winners WAY too soon. Never wrong and afraid to be right is a disaster...for me the most difficult aspect of transition from market maker to retail trader.

Dan

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote




Last Updated on December 17, 2018


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts