NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Rithmic


Discussion in Brokers

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one mattz with 28 posts (26 thanks)
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 18 posts (8 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Futures Operator with 15 posts (3 thanks)
    4. looks_4 liquidcci with 12 posts (9 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one manualtrader with 1.2 thanks per post
    2. looks_two mattz with 0.9 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 liquidcci with 0.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 0.4 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 132,096 views
    2. thumb_up 122 thanks given
    3. group 50 followers
    1. forum 204 posts
    2. attach_file 5 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Rithmic

  #181 (permalink)
 
Scalpguy's Avatar
 Scalpguy 
Helsinki, Finland
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: SC and TWS
Broker: IB and AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, CL
Posts: 206 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 17
Thanks Received: 166

The best solution would be that all (exchange, execution platform, your server and maybe broker too [risk control?!]) are located in the same data center. What I know for the case of mine (CME/Globex futures) it should be Aurora in Chicago.

If I have understood right the Rithmic and theomne.com servers are working in the same local network and located in Aurora. Building your app on Rithmic's R|Diamond technology you should able to achieve those below 1ms executions all the way down to 250us.

I am fine when I reach something about 5 ms. Currently I am sitting with my paper account at 15 ms. It seems my goal is realistic without the costs rising too high.

So my plan is to keep the blackbox colocated and then follow overall running from my charts here in Finland.

btw.Rithmic paper gives currently about 300ms here from Finland.

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
33 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
My NQ Trading Journal
14 thanks
HumbleTraders next chapter
11 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
11 thanks
  #182 (permalink)
Alphachase
Nicosia, Cyprus
 
Posts: 191 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 28
Thanks Received: 106


Quoting 
For certain platforms there are additional gateways available through the Rithmic infrastructure that can help reduce latency or disconnections. For example, when using SierraChart, you will notice in the ‘server’ field in the Data/Trade Service settings there are additional options, and one will let you choose the ‘Europe’ gateway. This should also be possible programmatically when using R | API as well.

Choosing a closer gateway means that the network intermediaries are likely reduced and can result in a more stable experience in regards to connection state. This also allows for swift and reliable transfer from Rithmic gateway to the Rithmic infrastructure in Chicago.

That definitely will be true until one day you find your European ISP (or a trunk provider) routing a signal to European host via Chicago. And it isn't an exceptional case at all BTW.

Reply With Quote
  #183 (permalink)
 
sam028's Avatar
 sam028 
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 3,765 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 3,825
Thanks Received: 4,629



Alphachase View Post
That definitely will be true until one day you find your European ISP (or a trunk provider) routing a signal to European host via Chicago. And it isn't an exceptional case at all BTW.

That won't change the speed of light. Finland to Chicago at the speed of light, straight line and avoiding Earth curve , is around 2.5 ms. That's the theory, 2.5 ms with a flat earth and the signal travelling in vacuum. If you add that fiber optic eats 35% of the light speed, we're now at 4 ms. Then you add a bunch of electronic component and you're around 140 ms.
HFT talks in μs, with much much higher costs, being in around 10 ms with retail traders costs is already amazing.

Success requires no deodorant! (Sun Tzu)
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #184 (permalink)
 
Scalpguy's Avatar
 Scalpguy 
Helsinki, Finland
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: SC and TWS
Broker: IB and AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, CL
Posts: 206 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 17
Thanks Received: 166


sam028 View Post
...HFT talks in μs, with much much higher costs, being in around 10 ms with retail traders costs is already amazing.

I agree 100%

btw. https://ampfutures-rithmic.com/rithmic-trading-infastructure.html

Reply With Quote
  #185 (permalink)
 
Scalpguy's Avatar
 Scalpguy 
Helsinki, Finland
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: SC and TWS
Broker: IB and AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, CL
Posts: 206 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 17
Thanks Received: 166


Scalpguy View Post
The best solution would be that all (exchange, execution platform, your server and maybe broker too [risk control?!]) are located in the same data center. What I know for the case of mine (CME/Globex futures) it should be Aurora in Chicago.

If I have understood right the Rithmic and theomne.com servers are working in the same local network and located in Aurora. Building your app on Rithmic's R|Diamond technology you should able to achieve those below 1ms executions all the way down to 250us.

I am fine when I reach something about 5 ms. Currently I am sitting with my paper account at 15 ms. It seems my goal is realistic without the costs rising too high.

So my plan is to keep the blackbox colocated and then follow overall running from my charts here in Finland.

btw.Rithmic paper gives currently about 300ms here from Finland.

Closing closing ...

From Cermak & paper account my R|API app sits now at 8,8ms (tick-to-filled trade). Sotware overhead is only 40 us on Window$


btw. SierraChart gives something about 25-100 ms. It is not very stable and of course very much up to what you have on your charts...

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #186 (permalink)
 
Keen4Snow's Avatar
 Keen4Snow 
Destin, FL / EU (Brno, Czech Rep.)
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: R|Trader, NinjaTrader, JForex
Trading: CL, NQ, TF, 6E
Posts: 20 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 15


mattz View Post
For certain platforms there are additional gateways available through the Rithmic infrastructure that can help reduce latency or disconnections. ....

Choosing a closer gateway means that the network intermediaries are likely reduced and can result in a more stable experience in regards to connection state. This also allows for swift and reliable transfer from Rithmic gateway to the Rithmic infrastructure in Chicago.

While I do not have specific latency figures at this time, it is always worth a shot to try a closer gateway to see if it will reduce some of the general network issues in regards to your connection.

I am located in central Europe.
Roundtrip times to Rithmic servers (directly to Chicago) are 146 ms in average (measured in R|Trader).
When connected through european gateway the average ping is 55 ms only.

Reply With Quote
  #187 (permalink)
 
mattz's Avatar
 mattz   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 2,493 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 2,441
Thanks Received: 3,791


Keen4Snow View Post
I am located in central Europe.
Roundtrip times to Rithmic servers (directly to Chicago) are 146 ms in average (measured in R|Trader).
When connected through european gateway the average ping is 55 ms only.

That is Great! Happy to hear that you were able to improve your latency by so much.
Sierra, MultiChart and R-Trader do have the ability to choose your routing.

Thanks,
Matt

Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected]
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #188 (permalink)
 
Jonson's Avatar
 Jonson 
Russia, St.Petersburg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, CQG Desktop
Broker: NinjaTrader/CQG
Trading: Futures
Posts: 247 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 218
Thanks Received: 118

i'm from RU and my connect through european gateway the average ping is 55 ms too ;-)

* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
Reply With Quote
  #189 (permalink)
 
Scalpguy's Avatar
 Scalpguy 
Helsinki, Finland
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: SC and TWS
Broker: IB and AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, CL
Posts: 206 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 17
Thanks Received: 166


Jonson View Post
i'm from RU and my connect through european gateway the average ping is 55 ms too ;-)

Here in Helsinki it is quite the same 55 ms but here where I live (in Finland) it is something like 70 ms.

If I remember right the Rithmic gateway here in Europe is located in Ireland...

BUT when we are talking about the tick-to-confirmed trade executions times (which is what counts in algos) you can multiply these times something like 3-6x depending on the current net traffic.

So in the case of algos it is worth to invest something like 50 euros (or less) / mo and you will get something like 5-7 ms tick-to-trade consistently. 250e more and then you will get under 1 ms.

As Sam said this is guite low compared to costs.

Below these values it starts to look much more ugly in the terms of required work and money...

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #190 (permalink)
 
sam028's Avatar
 sam028 
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 3,765 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 3,825
Thanks Received: 4,629



Scalpguy View Post
Here in Helsinki it is quite the same 55 ms but here where I live (in Finland) it is something like 70 ms.

If I remember right the Rithmic gateway here in Europe is located in Ireland...

BUT when we are talking about the tick-to-confirmed trade executions times (which is what counts in algos) you can multiply these times something like 3-6x depending on the current net traffic.

So in the case of algos it is worth to invest something like 50 euros (or less) / mo and you will get something like 5-7 ms tick-to-trade consistently. 250e more and then you will get under 1 ms.

As Sam said this is guite low compared to costs.

Below these values it starts to look much more ugly in the terms of required work and money...

Correct.
The latency to the closest gateway is one thing, the overwall latency is something else. From Ireland it will have to travel through the Atlantic anyway for US based instruments (and also for risk management, I don't know if Rithmic have risk management server in Ireland).
Keep in mind that nothing can go faster than the speed of light (which is also at least 35% slower in optic fibre)

Success requires no deodorant! (Sun Tzu)
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote




Last Updated on March 26, 2023


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts