Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
has anybody make some experience with the colocation services with mirus futures? There speak about "Dedicated Servers" and about "Virtual Machines" without labeling the costs. Perhaps someone could address the costs and some details about the infrastructure and location.
Thanks,
Koepisch
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
I wanted to provide a quick post regarding some great service. So to prequalify my position, I have no financial interest in the following business nor do I benefit from this posting in any way, only wanted to share with others …
Yep, I can't agree more...and since @sam028 is providing not only a great and reliable service, he usually treats nexusfi.com (formerly BMT) Members nicer than others (he claims that at least)...
my question is very specific to the mirus offer. I've examined the colocation services at Aurora and Equinix from Sam, Steadfast, Advantage Futures, Velocity Futures and EOTPro and all offerings have their value. Mirus claims that their colocation is located behind the DMZ and close to the zenfire servers. That could be an minor advantage, but i don't know WHERE the Colo-Servers are located in detail. I want to use 2 different Colo-providers to spread the infrastructure risk a little bit more.
It's also because futures.io (formerly BMT) members treats me better than if I was an anonymous vendor .
About @Koepisch question, whatever the providers, if you're only trying to limit the risks, you just need to know where they are located to avoid having the same SPOF (Single Point Of Failure) for both providers.
Being just 1 hop before the DMZ or 5 hops won't dramatically change the latency and the fills, IMHO.
.