Eurex Autotrading - Server Hosts / Broker / Data Feeds - Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Eurex Autotrading - Server Hosts / Broker / Data Feeds
Updated: Views / Replies:6,059 / 24
Created: by Koepisch Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Eurex Autotrading - Server Hosts / Broker / Data Feeds

  #11 (permalink)
Just a boy
Auckland, New Zealand
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker/Data: AMP/CQG
Favorite Futures: Whatever moves in my timezone
 
Posts: 1,803 since Sep 2009
Thanks: 3,165 given, 1,372 received


pfranz View Post
Velocity told me that they have data-only servers in Frankfurt,and also Zenfire has their servers in Frankfurt (though you can access european markets with Zenfire only if you clear with RCG).
CQG has servers in London, not in Frankfurt, and nowhere else in Europe,as far as I know.
IB has a server in Switzerland (Zug) and nowhere else in Europe.
Patsystems and TT have servers in Europe (TT more than one, don't know about Patsystems).

Me too would like to know which brokers have servers in Europe, for executio and realtime data, though I don't want to co-locate.

I think I need to disagree with the statement about ZenFire.

I am with Mirus (broker) and my FCM is Dorman (not RCG - although I could use them with Mirus as well). My data is ZF and I trade and execute FDAX just fine all the time.

Reply With Quote
 
  #12 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Valletta, Malta
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Proprietary
Favorite Futures: Currency futures
 
Posts: 26 since Aug 2012
Thanks: 1 given, 14 received

I was talking about Zenfire as quote provider, don't know about order routing. Of course you can route orders with Zenfire+Dorman (and all other systems) to Eurex, problem is the path(and latency) of the data, that is what concerns OP (and me).
We are in Europe and using an european server makes a big difference for us; if you are in New Zealand or in US it's probably better to use a US server than an european one.
Velocity should have TT data servers in Frankfurt (but for quotes only, you can't route orders); they shouldn't have any CQG server. I don't think any broker has CQG servers,it's different form TT where brokers host TT FIX Adapter.
Of course nearly any broker using CQG can make you use CQG London server, but this is another matter.


Last edited by pfranz; October 12th, 2012 at 08:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #13 (permalink)
Elite Member
@ Germany
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Favorite Futures: FDAX
 
Posts: 441 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 254 given, 369 received


It's a more extensive subject as i thought. I assume that there isn't a perfect solution which fits all needs. Until recently "Advantage Futures" had a good solution (X-Trader Pro, TT Infrastructure, Feed- and Order Routing from Frankfurt, Colocation services), but it seems that their dropped this service currently and searching for a new solution. The only disadvantage was the high monthly fees for the X-Trader Pro lease.

A major issue is that we want to minimize the latency and NO packet should be transmitted over the ocean. I think all US-Brokers will have their backoffice stuff (risk- and account management) still in the US, so i'm afraid that there still is a latency. I will ask the brokers regarding this issue. But overall it would an improvment if the data feed would come directly from frankfurt.


Last edited by Koepisch; October 13th, 2012 at 08:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #14 (permalink)
Elite Member
GER
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: MC
Favorite Futures: ES
 
Posts: 144 since May 2011
Thanks: 11 given, 211 received

It is only interesting if you are doing some size a month, then you could ask HSBC Trinkaus (contact is Schulte-Lingemann). They could offer Direct access to Eurex terminals.

I know the german broker Sino.de use them as clearer (like most small former german floor brokers). They have their server at the Deutsche Börse, but their (Sino) fees are not competitive compared to the brokers mentioned here before.


Last edited by SPMC; October 13th, 2012 at 09:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #15 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Valletta, Malta
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Proprietary
Favorite Futures: Currency futures
 
Posts: 26 since Aug 2012
Thanks: 1 given, 14 received


Koepisch View Post
I think all US-Brokers will have their backoffice stuff (risk- and account management) in still in the US, so i'm afraid that there still is a latency. I will ask the brokers regarding this issue. But overall it would a improvment if the data feed would come directly from frankfurt.

This is not true, they can move risk management to the place where execution is. Certainly it is done by Interactive brokers, as they told me, and I've measured the time to get a submission / cancellation order from Italy: in IDEM market I got best=49ms, average=59ms for getting a submission confirmation, and best=39ms, average=49ms for a cancellation confirmation. I'm using normal API with IB Gateway(which slows things down), if I got a FIX connection and got rid of the Gateway I think I could improve these results.
Note that my ping time to IB swiss server is around 20ms, so you would have to change light speed limit (and all modern physics) to have a result like this while sending data to US.
I'm quite sure that CQG does the same when you use their London server,but I cannot swear;anyway I believe that any US broker which knows its job would either move risk management to Europe and keep an execution server there,or keep just an US execution server.
The point is that moving execution to Europe while keeping risk management in US is a total waste of money, as latency is still there.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to pfranz for this post:
 
  #16 (permalink)
Elite Member
@ Germany
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Favorite Futures: FDAX
 
Posts: 441 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 254 given, 369 received

Thanks for your insights. Your last point is very important and have to be confirmed from every broker. Velocity Brokers told me that CQG (only chat contact) has her feed servers direct in Frankfurt, but 2 postings mentioned only the Londons server. I believe that you can't trust every answer.

It was noticeable that IB is the only (large international) broker which is directly located in europe and this could be the reason why other us brokers utilize some IB systems. I will ask IB for that.

Your ping and execution times scared me a little bit. With colocation and direct feed/execution i want to get down to 10ms and lower. I don't doing HFT stuff, but i do limit orders and i don't want to be last the in the queue. Many BM members claim IB as thier broker and i ever wondered WHY - complete useless feeds, execution sub us-standard, annoying opening procedure and so on. But perhaps bundling IB for execution and CQG for data feed could be worthwhile.

pfranz mentioned trading API's. This is the next issue, but that isn't the right thread. In the last days i looked at TT API, X-Trader API, TT FIX API und CQG API and i'm still confused. For the US part i will use the R|API. It were nice to use the TT API regarding the posibilities, but 1400$ a month only for the API (and X Trader PRO) is too much. I have a problem to spend money for no real service in return.

Hereinafter i will be investigate the possible IB connections and hope for some general API connectivity. Europe isn't a retail trader paradise. Every broker who would read the thread could make a furtune, if they would offering a complete solution (Feed, Execution, Colocation) for EUREX traders !!!


pfranz View Post
This is not true, they can move risk management to the place where execution is. Certainly it is done by Interactive brokers, as they told me, and I've measured the time to get a submission / cancellation order from Italy: in IDEM market I got best=49ms, average=59ms for getting a submission confirmation, and best=39ms, average=49ms for a cancellation confirmation. I'm using normal API with IB Gateway(which slows things down), if I got a FIX connection and got rid of the Gateway I think I could improve these results.
Note that my ping time to IB swiss server is around 20ms, so you would have to change light speed limit (and all modern physics) to have a result like this while sending data to US.
I'm quite sure that CQG does the same when you use their London server,but I cannot swear;anyway I believe that any US broker which knows its job would either move risk management to Europe and keep an execution server there,or keep just an US execution server.
The point is that moving execution to Europe while keeping risk management in US is a total waste of money, as latency is still there.


Reply With Quote
 
  #17 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Valletta, Malta
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Proprietary
Favorite Futures: Currency futures
 
Posts: 26 since Aug 2012
Thanks: 1 given, 14 received

CQG will probably have some servers in Frankfurt, but the point is which is the server which gives me the data, and which is the path from the exchange to me.
I'm quite sure CQG execution server is in London; quote server might be different and could be in Frankfurt, but I don't think so. Ask them.
Do you think my execution times are too high? For a retail trader using normal internet connection I believe they are low. IB has other (costly) connection types, and execution at IB (not accounting for the actual connection speed in itself) could be faster.
And don't underestimate the weight of their Gateway; it's a heavy java application and it adds to latency: I saw that running Gateway on older computers increased latency too much,since it should be a mere TCP relay, and so very fast. The times I quoted you are obtained running my application together with Gateway on an Acer Aspire One 110 with Windows 2000, Atom N270 processor and 512MB of RAM. I would really like to test IB connecttion with FIX, but I don't want to spend the money required for it (especially to raise the minimum commissions I'd need to do every month).
Note that IDEM is in Italy and IB server in switzerland, so it's not the same as co-locating at IDEM. You can't figure out your latency simply subtracting simple "parts" like ping time: you have to build your system and then test a lot of options and see the numbers that come out. In my opinion a <10ms latency with co-location is reasonable.
I don't know whether a broker would make a lot of money offering low-latency european solutions, I believe that latency is a too disregarded problem, even by scalpers; I'm happy to hear that someone understands that latency affects ALL orders (including limit orders, exactly for the reason you mentioned).
Maybe we (interested in latency) all should make together explicit requests for low latency to brokers, so that they would know there is enough interest for that.
As to TT costs, a workaround used by some brokers (Deepdiscount,Velocity...) is to host a TT FIX adapter and charge a small fee per trade; the overhead is 1ms (they say), but of course FIX adapter must be in Europe (not easy to find).


Last edited by pfranz; October 13th, 2012 at 10:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to pfranz for this post:
 
  #18 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Valletta, Malta
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Proprietary
Favorite Futures: Currency futures
 
Posts: 26 since Aug 2012
Thanks: 1 given, 14 received

Today CQG confirmed me that all their Europe data servers (which are more than one) are in London.
Any news from Advantage?

Reply With Quote
 
  #19 (permalink)
Elite Member
@ Germany
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Favorite Futures: FDAX
 
Posts: 441 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 254 given, 369 received

Advantage has dropped his TT infrastructure at the eurex due to high costs. There is currently no replacement. Howard from DDT has announced that he's looking for a server placement near to the eurex. But i'm afraid that if advantage doesn't make it so DDT can't make it too.

I've found a solid hosting space from a german company. The prior mentioned broker SINO sounds good at the first sight but the commissions are to high (also at high volume). At a 8000 FDAX contracts/month SINO wants ten times more money then advantage futures. Therefor i can have A LOT of missing trades or bad slippage from my hosted system in chicago.

Advantage has send me a lot of info's today, so i have to process these mails first. But the risk management server will be only at chicago.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Koepisch for this post:
 
  #20 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Valletta, Malta
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Proprietary
Favorite Futures: Currency futures
 
Posts: 26 since Aug 2012
Thanks: 1 given, 14 received



Koepisch View Post
Howard from DDT has announced that he's looking for a server placement near to the eurex. But i'm afraid that if advantage doesn't make it so DDT can't make it too.

As you stated in a previous post,many people are interested in an European server. Howard is being very aggressive,providing cheap commissions and good service (everyone noticed how fast he replies to e-mails); if you look at elitetrader broker rating (both DDT and Crossland),you'll see that judgements are positive.
These are the premises for getting enough clients and volume to justify the costs for an European server. Crossland (Howard's FCM) is smaller than Advantage, but he could possibly find a better deal than Advantage, or some kind of solution Advantage doesn't have.
So, I'd give a 60-70% chance that Howard will make it; let's wait and see.
Thank you for the update, any news you can post is appreciated.

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > Eurex Autotrading - Server Hosts / Broker / Data Feeds

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Jigsaw Trading: TBA

Elite only

FuturesTrader71: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

Jan 18

RandBots: TBA

Jan 23

GFF Brokers & CME Group: Futures & Bitcoin

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's happening at Eurex? [Edit: Eurex is trading again] Jura Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 13 February 23rd, 2016 03:53 PM
newie looking for a good broker/platform/feeds gewoodfo Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 25 November 29th, 2011 07:39 PM
Sierra Chart and EUREX - Broker syd430 Sierra Chart 10 September 17th, 2011 05:54 PM
FDAX (Eurex) Broker for Ninjatrader ikeaboy Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 5 August 17th, 2011 10:21 PM
Eurex Data Request Mftkn Traders Hideout 1 August 12th, 2009 02:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-16 in 0.15 seconds with 39 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.226.113.250