NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





CME Group wants customer money held at clearing houses


Discussion in Brokers

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one brydubtrade with 6 posts (3 thanks)
    2. looks_two wavey with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    3. looks_3 vegasfoster with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 itrade2win with 1 posts (1 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one ThatManFromTexas with 2 thanks per post
    2. looks_two wavey with 1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 ab456 with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 brydubtrade with 0.5 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 4,751 views
    2. thumb_up 11 thanks given
    3. group 6 followers
    1. forum 13 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

CME Group wants customer money held at clearing houses

  #11 (permalink)
 
brydubtrade's Avatar
 brydubtrade 
London UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: VK (Futures) & TS (FX)
Broker: Vankar + DTN.IQFeed (moved from Bloomberg)
Trading: Futures - Indices, Energy, Metals, Currencies (starting to look at some softs)
Posts: 18 since Jun 2012
Thanks Given: 32
Thanks Received: 10

exactly, thats why I think a central futures pool may be the way to go as I too use ICE(E) for my brent trades and then there's eurex etc and I dont fancy having funds split across different clearing houses as that just wouldn't work for me.

I think something needs to be done though.

Maybe a funds insurance policy (guaranteed) might be worth considering but for the exact funds amount (here in the UK we have a compensation scheme but it is only up to £50K [savings get £85K] and if you have more in your broker, still leaves a shortfall)?

thanks all for your replies so far :-)

Follow me on Twitter Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
34 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
17 thanks
Vinny E-Mini & Algobox Review TRADE ROOM
13 thanks
My NQ Trading Journal
12 thanks
  #12 (permalink)
 
brydubtrade's Avatar
 brydubtrade 
London UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: VK (Futures) & TS (FX)
Broker: Vankar + DTN.IQFeed (moved from Bloomberg)
Trading: Futures - Indices, Energy, Metals, Currencies (starting to look at some softs)
Posts: 18 since Jun 2012
Thanks Given: 32
Thanks Received: 10

although if the funds were split across clearing houses but at your broker it is all aggregated as a single lump, that might work...

just need to ensure the clearing house(s) don't go belly up ;-)

Follow me on Twitter Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)
1nfinlty
Melbourne Australia
 
Posts: 17 since Feb 2012
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Received: 7


I always thought customer funds for futures were segregated? And they are right?
But how can the broker just take chunks of customers money out and gamble with it?
Is this not the fault of the bank where the money is held? Why do they allow this?
Its ok if the Bank itself invests the money like even money in a savings account they can, but they will never lose it.
How is the broker itself allowed to remove money from customer accounts without the proper records for trading and clearing purposes?
The banks need to be held liable for this I believe as they are regulated to supervise said segregated accounts and they are not doing it.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #14 (permalink)
 
brydubtrade's Avatar
 brydubtrade 
London UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: VK (Futures) & TS (FX)
Broker: Vankar + DTN.IQFeed (moved from Bloomberg)
Trading: Futures - Indices, Energy, Metals, Currencies (starting to look at some softs)
Posts: 18 since Jun 2012
Thanks Given: 32
Thanks Received: 10

Hi 1nfinity - apologies for delayed response, still enjoying a summer break :-)

indeed, it completely amazed me what these brokers did and how they had managed to do it under the '?watchful eye?' of the banks and regulators...

Being a customer of MF Global UK at the time they went under, I have since learned that re-hypothecation seemed to be a major part in allowing the broker to prop-up their own bets with customer monies (even segregated I believe) which eventually lead to their going into chap 11/administration.

To be honest, I wouldn't have even known to look in the small print for re-hypothecation as probably naivety on my part, I thought segregated meant segregated (plus I had never heard the term re-hypothecation either..!).

Cheers
Bry

Follow me on Twitter Started this thread Reply With Quote




Last Updated on August 3, 2012


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts