NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





IQfeed vs IB data as data provider for Multicharts


Discussion in Brokers

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one SPTrading with 4 posts (6 thanks)
    2. looks_two vegasfoster with 3 posts (1 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Fat Tails with 3 posts (11 thanks)
    4. looks_4 JackR with 3 posts (1 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Fat Tails with 3.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two SPTrading with 1.5 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 sptrader with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 JackR with 0.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 21,562 views
    2. thumb_up 21 thanks given
    3. group 7 followers
    1. forum 21 posts
    2. attach_file 3 attachments




 
Search this Thread

IQfeed vs IB data as data provider for Multicharts

  #21 (permalink)
 JackR 
Washington, DC
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multicharts
Broker: InteractiveBrokers/IB
Trading: CL\EUR
Posts: 15 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 10
Thanks Received: 8

I think a lot probably depends on how well the charting platform developers understood the IB Application Program Interface (API) and the effort they made to get the data feed to work properly. This could explain some of the IB good/ IB bad comments. I've looked back through this thread but cannot really figure out what software is being used. The OP asked about Multicharts. But some mention was made of Ninja and there are other mentions of feeds without charting packages. So a little more info about the package used might help sort things out.

Jack

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
About a successful futures trader who didnĀ“t know anyth …
Psychology and Money Management
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
Quant vue
Trading Reviews and Vendors
Cheap historycal L1 data for stocks
Stocks and ETFs
 
  #22 (permalink)
 SPTrading 
London, England
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MC, TS, NT
Broker: TradeStation
Trading: ES
Posts: 41 since Oct 2009
Thanks Given: 12
Thanks Received: 21


JackR View Post
I think a lot probably depends on how well the charting platform developers understood the IB Application Program Interface (API) and the effort they made to get the data feed to work properly. This could explain some of the IB good/ IB bad comments. I've looked back through this thread but cannot really figure out what software is being used. The OP asked about Multicharts. But some mention was made of Ninja and there are other mentions of feeds without charting packages. So a little more info about the package used might help sort things out.

Jack

Yes I think you are right, this probably explains the different experiences. There are very many details about the data and API. When I moved to MC it was on the basis that it could do many of the things TS does but better/faster. I wanted a plattform that could automate trading within one package but not have to trade via TS. I have found MC to be very much faster in real time trading (I have never perceived any charting lag) as well as backtesting, and also more stable.

I had the impression that MC was conceived to some or a great extent with IB as an important data supplier and therefore the support for IB is excellent. So, with reference to MC, the idea that IB realtime data does not match history or that it can't do volume or range bar charts is absurd, I would have spotted that on day one!

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on January 16, 2012


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts