How advanced mathematics and gaming theory can help you as a trader - futures io
futures io futures trading



How advanced mathematics and gaming theory can help you as a trader


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated by staassis
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Fat Tails with 58 posts (125 thanks)
    2. looks_two RM99 with 18 posts (27 thanks)
    3. looks_3 worldwary with 10 posts (19 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Nickemp with 7 posts (15 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one MXASJ with 3.5 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Fat Tails with 2.2 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 worldwary with 1.9 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 RM99 with 1.5 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 42,993 views
    2. thumb_up 286 thanks given
    3. group 66 followers
    1. forum 204 replies
    2. attach_file 16 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

How advanced mathematics and gaming theory can help you as a trader

(login for full post details)
  #31 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Berlin, Europe
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,830 since Mar 2010
Thanks: 4,237 given, 26,553 received


MXASJ View Post
With a fair coin, what is the chance of a HHHT pattern? 1 in 16.

All heads? (HHHH) 1 in 16.

All tails? (TTTT) 1 in 16.

All possibilities are equal

HHHH
HHHT
HHTH
HTHH
THHH
HHTT
HTTH
TTHH
HTHT
THHT
THTH
TTTH
TTHT
THTT
HTTT
TTTT

Some people think that these probabilities change, once a string of TTTT has occurred. This is the Gambler's Fallacy.

The probability to get an H after a HHHH string is the same probability as the probability to get an H after a TTTT string. The coin does not have a memory, or otherwise put, the coin tosses are non-correlated or stochastically independent.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Fat Tails for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Scan by comparing SMAs within 5 mins
ThinkOrSwim
Do you trade on Sundays?
Emini and Emicro Index
Corn Sep-Dec20
Commodities
NT8 trade the plan: access to the divergence indicator signals (sharkindicators)
NinjaTrader
FYI plot bug & workaround: changing color or width is delayed 1 bar
EasyLanguage Programming
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on futures io
Is anyone actually making money?
186 thanks
Micro account vs Funded account (combine)
53 thanks
Are sharks watching on the other side?
32 thanks
Market profile entries/exits
25 thanks
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
22 thanks
 
(login for full post details)
  #32 (permalink)
Washington DC
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
 
Posts: 214 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 110 given, 117 received

This thread reminds me of a remark made to me by a trading mentor. I had personal knowledge of his trading success, and he used several different indicators including a form of linear regression.

At the time he was trading a 5 minute SP chart, with no over night data. So using a 10 period linear regression indicator it was obvious if there was a big gap the indicator was very wrong the first 10 bars.

I wrote him and explained how the indicator was wrong and shouldn't be used in the first 10 bars if there was a gap. I'll never forget his answer.

It was, "If I understand all you do about this indicator, I might not use it to help me make money, but I don't understand what you are talking about, so I use it, and it does help me make money." This is a real trader talking.

So to me while the discussion about the advanced math and gaming theory is interesting, to me, wanting to improve my trading, it is really irrelevant.

Pete

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to Peter2150 for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #33 (permalink)
Los Angeles, California
 
 
Posts: 34 since Mar 2011
Thanks: 0 given, 7 received


Very interesting strategy. I'll have to do a trial run.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #34 (permalink)
Data Wizard!!!
Cincinnati Ohio
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: TastyWorks
Broker: TastyWorks
Trading: FX, Stocks, Options
 
Silver Dragon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,807 since Feb 2011
Thanks: 5,102 given, 4,163 received

If what everyone said is true then for the past 3 years I have been the theoretical and statistical anomaly that keeps statisticians up at night… And I am ok with that.

I actually have more to say, however it is pizza and movie night with the family.

And just for the record I am not giving up or giving back the 135 dollars I won 3 months ago at the Grand Victoria casino using the before mentioned technique, no matter what the theory says!

Have a great night!

SD

nosce te ipsum

You make your own opportunities in life.
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #35 (permalink)
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: Futures
 
Posts: 882 since Mar 2011
Thanks: 124 given, 698 received


Fat Tails View Post
Some people think that these probabilities change, once a string of TTTT has occurred. This is the Gambler's Fallacy.

The probability to get an H after a HHHH string is the same probability as the probability to get an H after a TTTT string. The coin does not have a memory, or otherwise put, the coin tosses are non-correlated or stochastically independent.

Again, no one is disputing the probability of a given singular event, we're discussing STRINGs of events. The probability of strings is a different consideration.

You can calculate the probability of a string of events. That is the concept at work here.

The law or large numbers says that the probability of a 4 series sample is just as much H-T-H-T as it is H-H-T-T,

but where the theory falls short is when you DON'T have an infinite sampling. When you have a finite sampling, you observe strings of events. It's those strings that allow a progressive strategy to be beneficial.

The idea is to take advantage of enough events that strings are relevant, but not enough that they become irrelevant (if that makes sense).

I fully concede that this strategy becomes more prolific with card games, because the prob of a win in blackjack increases with every loss...thus they are not mutually exclusive.

The theory becomes particularly relevant in examining probabilities that aren't even. A 70% win ratio for instance will yield a significant number of positive strings. If you utilize a progressive strategy along positive strings, the yield is MORE. It's simple math.

However, as I've pointed out in other threads, in order for the theory to be effective, you need to have a fairly resolute/continuous instrument. Futures contracts for example, are relatively discrete. A CL contract with it's marginal reserve will NOT allow you to "rollover" profit amounts like stocks. (i.e. you can't increase your "wager" with a futures contract like you can with stocks....because of the marginal reserve).

The other part is that the strategy must incorporate a similar profit/loss ratio. If you're strategy incorporates a 50/50 ratio, and you're anything above 50%, then string theory and progressive wagering INCREASES your rake.

For example, in a 100 trade sampling, at 70%, you'd expect the string distribution to look something like this....

Losing Series:

1 - 18
2 - 3
3 - 2

That means that you have an 18/23 (78%) probability of a winning trade after a losing trade. Losing series progressive strategies aren't as effective, because you have to have additional capital in reserve in order to take advantage (i.e. you'd have been better off simply risking your reserve over all trades).

However, as I said, with stocks, where you can rollover your profits more resolutely, winning string progressive strategies will help.

A 4 string winning series for example, will yield .25, .3125, .3906, .488 and .22 (for the last loss) for a total of 1.66 units of profit. That same series when only using the same starting positionsize will end up making 1.5 units (for 4 wins followed by a loss). It simply helps to ensure that you have increasing profits without risking ALL of your past profits on every subsequent trade. The phenomenon is even MORE pronounced when you use 100/100 ratios.

Furthermore, a progressive strategy for wins (and a reduction to the original positionsize for losers) helps to ensure that losing strings are minimized.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to RM99 for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #36 (permalink)
Asia
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader, TOS
 
Posts: 798 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 109 given, 797 received

I think we are mixing apples and oranges here.

For the fair coin example, strings or the number of prior samples is irrelevent as the outcome is not serially dependent on history. Its a straight forward binomial tree.

In cards, that is different. Each card drawn changes the probabilities moving forward. If an ace is drawn, there are no longer four aces in the deck.

In slots, that is different. I'm no expert on gaming regs but the slots are required by law to return x over n runs.

So the string thing only works if the future outcome in contingent on prior outcomes.

Progressive betting on the future outcomes is then a seperate issue.

Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to MXASJ for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #37 (permalink)
Houston,Tx
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Trading: TF
 
ThatManFromTexas's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,302 since Feb 2010
Thanks: 1,206 given, 4,323 received

There's just one problem with all these calculations and probabilities.... Sh#t Happens...

From Time Magazine May 29, 2009; Holy Craps! How a Gambling Grandma Broke the Craps World Record - TIME

What is the probability of rolling a pair of dice 154 times continuously at a craps table, without throwing a seven?

The answer is roughly 1 in 1.56 trillion, and on May 23, Patricia Demauro, a New Jersey grandmother, beat those odds at Atlantic City's Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa. Demauro's 154-roll lucky streak, which lasted four hours and 18 minutes, broke the world records for the longest craps roll and the most successive dice rolls without "sevening out."

I'm just a simple man trading a simple plan.

My daddy always said, "Every day above ground is a good day!"
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to ThatManFromTexas for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #38 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Berlin, Europe
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,830 since Mar 2010
Thanks: 4,237 given, 26,553 received


RM99 View Post
The law or large numbers says that the probability of a 4 series sample is just as much H-T-H-T as it is H-H-T-T, but where the theory falls short is when you DON'T have an infinite sampling. When you have a finite sampling, you observe strings of events. It's those strings that allow a progressive strategy to be beneficial.

The idea is to take advantage of enough events that strings are relevant, but not enough that they become irrelevant (if that makes sense).

No, it does not make sense.

Either events are correlated. In this case you can use strings to define conditional probabilities and execute progressive betting strategies can be used. They betting strategies will not become irrelevant with a high number of samples.

Or the events are independent, as is the case with throwing dice. In this case progressive betting is entirely useless.


RM99 View Post
I fully concede that this strategy becomes more prolific with card games, because the prob of a win in blackjack increases with every loss...thus they are not mutually exclusive.

This is the whole point. If the outcome of the event n (loss) has an impact on the outcome of the event (n+1), progressive betting makes sense. For black jack there is a negative correlation, as a loss increases the probability to win. Note that statistical analysis has been done on the ES, to find out, whether an up move is more likely to be followed by another up move (positive) correlation or a down move (negative correlation). The correlations that were found for ES were so small and unstable that they did not allow to compensate for transaction cost.


RM99 View Post
The theory becomes particularly relevant in examining probabilities that aren't even.

Again, no. The point is not, whether a probability is even or uneven, but how much that probability is affected by positive or negative auto-correlation.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Fat Tails for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #39 (permalink)
Washington DC
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
 
Posts: 214 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 110 given, 117 received


ThatManFromTexas View Post
There's just one problem with all these calculations and probabilities....

There is an even bigger problem with all this stuff, and that is the fact that the markets are moved, not by all this stuff, but by people who react to stuff with emotions.

Look at how markets react around reports, or some news crisis. On many occasions, the markets take off in one direction and then immediately come back. Then there is gunning for stops. What experienced trader isn't aware of this.

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to Peter2150 for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #40 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Berlin, Europe
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,830 since Mar 2010
Thanks: 4,237 given, 26,553 received



Peter2150 View Post
There is an even bigger problem with all this stuff, and that is the fact that the markets are moved, not by all this stuff, but by people who react to stuff with emotions.

Look at how markets react around reports, or some news crisis. On many occasions, the markets take off in one direction and then immediately come back. Then there is gunning for stops. What experienced trader isn't aware of this.

I really agree with this.

You say there is gunning for stops. Yes, of course it is. This is the truth of trading. Now, if you are gunning for stops, all you need to find out, where these stops are located. Once they have been triggered the market is free to reverse.

I even believe that this stop triggering is part of the hygiene of a reversal. How can the market reverse from short to long, if the new longs have not be stopped out? Trading is a zero-sum game, where you simply exploit the behavior of other traders, so you need to have an idea of what they are doing and how to trap them.

Emotions are creating feedbacks. This changes the market movement from random to trending (positive correlation) or counter trending (negative correlation). Once the market is not random any more, it becomes tradeable. Progressive betting can be introduced, if the correlation is known.

Chart attached: Assumed Stops detected by indicator

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Finding Stops.jpg
Views:	250
Size:	99.5 KB
ID:	35738  
Reply With Quote
The following 9 users say Thank You to Fat Tails for this post:


futures io Trading Community Psychology and Money Management > How advanced mathematics and gaming theory can help you as a trader


April 18, 2020


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Every journal equals ten meals for the hungry

Now
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts