What is the best Risk Reward Ratio? But is that the right question? - futures io
futures io



What is the best Risk Reward Ratio? But is that the right question?


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one WoodyFox with 11 posts (17 thanks)
    2. looks_two TWDsje with 10 posts (14 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Sandpaddict with 9 posts (2 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Madness with 9 posts (21 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one wldman with 6.5 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Madness with 2.3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 WoodyFox with 1.5 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 TWDsje with 1.4 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 6,832 views
    2. thumb_up 109 thanks given
    3. group 192 followers
    1. forum 70 posts
    2. attach_file 10 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

What is the best Risk Reward Ratio? But is that the right question?

(login for full post details)
  #11 (permalink)
 SBtrader82 
Rovigo (ITALY)
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: SierraChart, MotiveWave
Broker: Rithmic, Dorman, Interactive Brokers
Trading: Emini, Nasdaq, DAX, Bund, IBEX
 
SBtrader82's Avatar
 
Posts: 459 since Feb 2018
Thanks: 177 given, 1,032 received

The answer is 3.5:1 or anything between 3 and 4 to 1. I ran many simulations and this is the best value to use.


Sent using the futures.io mobile app

Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to SBtrader82 for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Driving Crazy please help: MUltichart bar closing event …
MultiCharts
Looking for VisEMA indicator for NT7
NinjaTrader
Talk is cheap - Trader motivation
Psychology and Money Management
Sierra / Heatmap data for Eurex ?
Sierra Chart
Tradovate to Offer FairX Futures Commission-Free
Tradovate
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #12 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
 
Posts: 3,033 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,617 given, 6,028 received


SBtrader82 View Post
The answer is 3.5:1 or anything between 3 and 4 to 1. I ran many simulations and this is the best value to use.


Sent using the futures.io mobile app


Can you share any of your study?

I've have never heard of a "best" r/r - given the amount of different strategies out there - so I am intrigued.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #13 (permalink)
 SBtrader82 
Rovigo (ITALY)
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: SierraChart, MotiveWave
Broker: Rithmic, Dorman, Interactive Brokers
Trading: Emini, Nasdaq, DAX, Bund, IBEX
 
SBtrader82's Avatar
 
Posts: 459 since Feb 2018
Thanks: 177 given, 1,032 received



kevinkdog View Post
Can you share any of your study?

I've have never heard of a "best" r/r - given the amount of different strategies out there - so I am intrigued.

yes sure!! First let me say that I think that there is no right or wrong in trading, so there is probably not an absolute optimal RR from a math standpoint. However if you do not scalp and you try to take some "reasonable" chunk out of the market, I think that most of the times anything in the range 3.5:1 to 4.5:1 risk reward is the best way to go.

I came to this conclusion first from a practical experience and second by build a very simple simulator.
You can see a thorough description of my experiment here:




In the experiment I was assuming that prices are "normally distributed" with variance equals 1. In this scenario the optimal value of RR depends on the stop that you use relative to the variance.
In practical terms you can think that the variance is the ATR of the day and you must assume that the stop cannot be too small compared to ATR. Thinking that your stop can be 0.05 when the variance is 1 would be unrealistic because it would mean that you can be extremely precise in your entry. Also your stop must be "reasonably big" compared to commissions. If you combine the theoretical results of the experiments with some practical experience you will probably arrive at the same conclusion.
Consider that in real life: you don't know what the daily range will be, you don't know the exact probability distribution of the market etc...

In the same thread I show a picture of the optimal RR for different values of the stop loss, see the results here:

Please don't misunderstand my experiment because it's not a "mathematical theory of everything", it's just a practical experiment that was meant to give me some hindsight. Also when I say a "optimal value" of RR, I mean something that can be right to use 85% of the days. Of course market is always changing and there are days in which you can ask the market a 10 times your risk, because there is a big trend.

Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to SBtrader82 for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #14 (permalink)
 Madness 
Tampa Florida
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: ThinkOrSwim, NinjaTrader
Broker: TD Ameritrade, NinjaTrader
Trading: ES, NQ, Equities
 
Madness's Avatar
 
Posts: 18 since Mar 2020
Thanks: 14 given, 30 received

Hello Adilius, Sorry for the really late response.

So, before you can understand my stop loss you have to understand the meaning of my thread. The whole point to my thread is to be able to test a strategy without being unskewed by stop-losses that are usually triggered by market makers running stops.

There are 4 requirements I need to classify a strategy successful. These requirements are:
1) Your strategy has to give you a 90% or higher win rate. Meaning it reaches the price target.
2) Your trade only lasts at most a few minutes. (1 sec to 20 min)
3) It has to give you consistent backtesting results under normal market conditions for 60 days.

With that said, instructions on how to use the ATR to adjust to the current market conditions are explained in my post.

Now, once you’ve established that your strategy meets the 3 requirements above, there is requirement number 4. And that is to “trust your strategy". And while some may not like my trading style, “trust your strategy” is a quote that all traders use no matter their trading style.

If you run your strategy without a stop loss through a simulator, and it doesn’t reach your price target, then that strategy does not work. Even less with a stop loss.


Adilius View Post
you are saying that you do have a catastrophic stop of 50 points and on your NQ (9 trades) chart all your targets are 10 points.. Does that mean that your stop is only 5 times larger than target?? That is not too bad.. please clarify

As far as my stop loss, yes, it is there at every trade I place. BUT ONLY THERE for a sudden unforeseen movement in the market that could be due an important news flash, glitch, flash crash, whatever that takes the market out of normal conditions.


Adilius View Post
Also, when you stuck in a trade that doesn't go your way but keeps going against you -> do you average down? I think second trade will help to get out of the first one (otherwise we are stuck with first trade for days....)

And as far as a trade that goes against me, that 10%. I have written instruction in my post about that that 1 trade out of 10 that needs to be identified and eliminated before incurring a loss.

Lastly, as matthew28 says, never average down, especially with futures. I also never hold for a day or days. In and out the same day, and start fresh the next.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Madness for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #15 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
 
Posts: 3,033 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,617 given, 6,028 received


SBtrader82 View Post
yes sure!! First let me say that I think that there is no right or wrong in trading, so there is probably not an absolute optimal RR from a math standpoint. However if you do not scalp and you try to take some "reasonable" chunk out of the market, I think that most of the times anything in the range 3.5:1 to 4.5:1 risk reward is the best way to go.

I came to this conclusion first from a practical experience and second by build a very simple simulator.
You can see a thorough description of my experiment here:




In the experiment I was assuming that prices are "normally distributed" with variance equals 1. In this scenario the optimal value of RR depends on the stop that you use relative to the variance.
In practical terms you can think that the variance is the ATR of the day and you must assume that the stop cannot be too small compared to ATR. Thinking that your stop can be 0.05 when the variance is 1 would be unrealistic because it would mean that you can be extremely precise in your entry. Also your stop must be "reasonably big" compared to commissions. If you combine the theoretical results of the experiments with some practical experience you will probably arrive at the same conclusion.
Consider that in real life: you don't know what the daily range will be, you don't know the exact probability distribution of the market etc...

In the same thread I show a picture of the optimal RR for different values of the stop loss, see the results here:

Please don't misunderstand my experiment because it's not a "mathematical theory of everything", it's just a practical experiment that was meant to give me some hindsight. Also when I say a "optimal value" of RR, I mean something that can be right to use 85% of the days. Of course market is always changing and there are days in which you can ask the market a 10 times your risk, because there is a big trend.


Thanks, I will take a look.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #16 (permalink)
 Madness 
Tampa Florida
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: ThinkOrSwim, NinjaTrader
Broker: TD Ameritrade, NinjaTrader
Trading: ES, NQ, Equities
 
Madness's Avatar
 
Posts: 18 since Mar 2020
Thanks: 14 given, 30 received


SBtrader82 View Post
yes sure!! First let me say that I think that there is no right or wrong in trading, so there is probably not an absolute optimal RR from a math standpoint.

I absolutely agree with you here. The strategy I use in my post cannot use a 4.5:1 or 3:1 ratio. The results of the signal I use for the strategy in my post, is a maximum of 12-15 handles that it will quickly pop up or down. So using 10 handles as my price target is optimal, and the best I can get for that particular signal.

There is no one almighty R:R, only what our minds would like us to get as a reward or the standard R:R we read about online. But R:Rs have to be tailored not to what we would like to get, or whatever the “standard” is, but to what we can get.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #17 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
 
Posts: 3,033 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,617 given, 6,028 received


Madness View Post
I absolutely agree with you here. The strategy I use in my post cannot use a 4.5:1 or 3:1 ratio. The results of the signal I use for the strategy in my post, is a maximum of 12-15 handles that it will quickly pop up or down. So using 10 handles as my price target is optimal, and the best I can get for that particular signal.

There is no one almighty R:R, only what our minds would like us to get as a reward or the standard R:R we read about online. But R:Rs have to be tailored not to what we would like to get, or whatever the “standard” is, but to what we can get.

You have a 90% win rate, for trades lasting 1 second to 20 minutes? What kind of net expectancy (or Tharp expectancy) does that generate?

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #18 (permalink)
 trendisyourfriend 
Legendary Market Wizard
Quebec
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader wt Rancho Dinero's profiling tools
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,066 since Oct 2009
Thanks: 3,717 given, 5,260 received

I don't understand the emphasis on the RR equation

Minimum Winrate = 1 / (1 + Reward:Risk)

A 1:1 RR = 50% winnings to break even point
A 4:1 RR = 20% winnings to break even point

Still a 50/50 proposition

Something else must be at play to win.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to trendisyourfriend for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #19 (permalink)
 Big Mike 
Site Administrator
Swing Trader
Data Scientist & DevOps
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Trading: Futures & Crypto
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 50,121 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 32,594 given, 98,697 received

@Madness, just wanted to say I like your avatar

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/

Visit other sites? Please spread the word about your experience with our community!
Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Big Mike for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #20 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
 
Posts: 3,033 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,617 given, 6,028 received



trendisyourfriend View Post
I don't understand the emphasis on the RR equation

Minimum Winrate = 1 / (1 + Reward:Risk)

A 1:1 RR = 50% winnings to break even point
A 4:1 RR = 20% winnings to break even point

Still a 50/50 proposition

Something else must be at play to win.


And that is without costs factored in!

If you have 1:1 NET R:R, you have to win about 55% of time just to breakeven (depending on slippage and commissions).

So, yes I agree: Something else must be at play to win. (that's the edge you hopefully have).

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 5 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:


futures io Trading Community Psychology and Money Management > What is the best Risk Reward Ratio? But is that the right question?


Last Updated on March 1, 2021


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing

BloodHound Fundamentals 101 w/Jeremy Tang @ SharkIndicators

Elite only
 

Our 12-year anniversary w/ $$,$$$ prizes (check soon)

June
     



Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada), info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts