Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Hmmm.... not too sure....wouldn't we have to enter more than necessary as opposed to entering it directly into the journal?
Also how would you correct or delete entries?
What would be the downside to enter these directly into the journal? I ask because the upside in my view would be more control and less to enter than with your sketch....
This was meant rather as helper tool to enter notes. The technical info could be read from the cvs and merge with the logs afterwards. We can show editable grid for corrections.
Absolutely agree. My reason behind the idea IS to make entry of notes quicker (form with proper tab index and some pre-filled fields is faster to handle)
Nanipulating the Excel is for such task slower imho.
maybe the importer can have an 'advanced'/'basic' option where it would allow just the normal operations like we have now, and the advanced would expand it so people could add the notes/comment/type of trade right from the importer, if they are in a hurry or something..
dont believe anything you hear and only half of what you see
well the reason i said that could be a way to do it is because i can see where this could go allot further than expected and we would go from an importer -> excel based journal to a full .net journal that brings in exported data(or data right from a few trading softwares own db's) into our own db.. just looking at the natural progression of the way ive seen software projects go.. good or bad, we should prolly draw some lines in the sand for the short term and long term?
we could also get our initial goal met and have a side discussion of where this should go? how do you guys feel? im personally open to anything and offer my time up for ideas, testing, etc as you already know..
dont believe anything you hear and only half of what you see
Improved stop efficiency calculations, should be accurate now and added ability to simulate stops
Added graph of ticks left on table in Target Analysis
As to migrating, I have changed some formatting on the journal tab and fixed a few formulas, so please only copy the area of your records and not the whole journal tab. Ether copy with "match destination formatting" or write back the formatting from the cels below the pasted range, if you know how to do that.
dont believe anything you hear and only half of what you see 