NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





real world stops and risk reward ratio.


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one snax with 6 posts (10 thanks)
    2. looks_two Salao with 3 posts (7 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Grantx with 2 posts (10 thanks)
    4. looks_4 veloxtrader with 2 posts (1 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Grantx with 5 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Leon of Pizza with 5 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Salao with 2.3 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 snax with 1.7 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 5,337 views
    2. thumb_up 44 thanks given
    3. group 11 followers
    1. forum 20 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

real world stops and risk reward ratio.

  #21 (permalink)
 
Leon of Pizza's Avatar
 Leon of Pizza 
St. Louis
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: thinkorswim, NT8
Trading: equity and fx futures and options
Posts: 137 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 99
Thanks Received: 192


mcteague View Post
...the chart said that was where risk should be...

Stop location should be derived from the chart, usually ignoring the last swing H/L. Also, prospective support/resistance is an area and 1t beyond its extreme is inside that area, so no place for a stop.

And stop location can be found from your experience logs. For any particular pattern or quantitative setup, what are the results for the last 50 times that you saw it set up? What is the W/L ratio? What is the min, max, avg MAE/MFE of the winners? What was the context when the outliers occurred?

Also, I got the impression that you think a risk/reward ratio alone determines the expectancy, or maybe conflated expectancy with probability of a win. My apologies if I misunderstood it. Expectancy is a value for a group of trades and it uses both the P/L and W/L. There are successful traders who take more losses than winners and they're good earners because they plan for appropriately higher risk/reward ratios. I'm not one because I can't take the psychological heat, but they exist. I'm lazy too, so I fell into a method that doesn't require me to work out expectancy in the planning stage. I monitor it in the result instead.

I use risk minimums for each product I trade and a minimum 1:1 risk/reward. For the Russell, I use 20t min, so if something on the chart tells me I can't get 20t or better, I don't take the trade and therefore avoid that level of noise. If I see from my experience logs that a particular pattern is producing a lot of winners with 25t MAE / 40t MFE, I'll adjust my plan to take 30t of risk for a 35t target. These values expand and contract, but they're always derived from observation and record keeping and the ratio always has to support a min 50% win rate.

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
29 thanks
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
25 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
Bigger Wins or Fewer Losses?
23 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
17 thanks




Last Updated on August 11, 2019


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts