TECHNIQUE: After three profitable trades, skipping the next setup. - Psychology and Money Management | futures.io
futures.io futures trading


TECHNIQUE: After three profitable trades, skipping the next setup.
Started: by AshleyQueenTrader Views / Replies:2,367 / 41
Last Reply: Attachments:0

Welcome to futures.io.

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.


You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

TECHNIQUE: After three profitable trades, skipping the next setup.

  #21 (permalink)
Live Your Bliss
Cancun, Mexico
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT
Favorite Futures: ES
 
Anagami's Avatar
 
Posts: 699 since Dec 2010
Thanks: 474 given, 1,389 received


Paige View Post
Is this thread for real? This reminds me of people I used to meet in Vegas who had the same notions. "If I get ahead this much..." or "If I win (or lose) this many hands in a row....." or "If I only play (X) amount of hours per day...".

Please understand that if you are trading a setup that has a positive expectation--- then you take every single trade that fits that criteria. Any statistic (or crazy notion) that you may come up with that leads you to believe otherwise is not sound logic. These trades don't know how much you are up or down, how many in a row you've won or lost -- or -- whether or not they are even taken during the same trading session.

Now if you have trouble going on tilt and sticking to your own plan, then I have no answer for you other than QUIT. I'm about sick of seeing foolish, unsound advice being tossed out as acceptable -- in order to coddle people who have discipline issues, trade too large, or too frequently, do not grasp basic math or know how to keep simple statistics.

Positive expectation trades are profitable over the long run. Take them! Negative ones are not. It doesn't matter how you click the mouse, slouch in your chair, walk away from the screen, how many you have won (or lost) in a row, whether you have argued with your spouse that morning, your kids are sick, how your confidence is running. None of this matters if you have made a trade with a positive expectation.

Peace,
Paige

Is your answer for real?

You don't seem to grasp the simple fact that even "a setup that has a positive expectation" goes through cyclical periods of gains and losses. The individual trades are NOT independent events, when your approach is consistent. The probability of having a winning trade is not the same after, say, a string of large winners. Why? Simply because the market does not keep on doing exactly the same thing. And if your trading method is consistent trade to trade, the probability of a winner goes down after a series of winners.

"...the degree to which you think you know, assume you know, or in any way need to know what is going to happen next, is equal to the degree to which you will fail as a trader." - Mark Douglas
Reply With Quote
 
  #22 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Bangkok
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MultiCharts.NET, S5, Ninj
Broker/Data: AMP, S5, IB
Favorite Futures: ES
 
DionysusToast's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,382 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 725 given, 7,219 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


Anagami View Post
I couldn't disagree more. If one's approach is consistent, then one's profitability is cyclical. If anything, one should stop after 3 winners.

No-one approaches the markets consistently every day.

Traders have bad days.

Or am I the only person here that has good days & bad days and days I should have just not sat down in the first place?

If you have any questions about the products or services provided, please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io "Ask Me Anything" thread
Reply With Quote
 
  #23 (permalink)
Live Your Bliss
Cancun, Mexico
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT
Favorite Futures: ES
 
Anagami's Avatar
 
Posts: 699 since Dec 2010
Thanks: 474 given, 1,389 received



DionysusToast View Post
No-one approaches the markets consistently every day.

Traders have bad days.

Or am I the only person here that has good days & bad days and days I should have just not sat down in the first place?

No one? Really? I thought there were 100% mechanical traders... I certainly was at one point.

"...the degree to which you think you know, assume you know, or in any way need to know what is going to happen next, is equal to the degree to which you will fail as a trader." - Mark Douglas
Reply With Quote
 
  #24 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Bangkok
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MultiCharts.NET, S5, Ninj
Broker/Data: AMP, S5, IB
Favorite Futures: ES
 
DionysusToast's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,382 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 725 given, 7,219 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


Paige View Post
Is this thread for real? This reminds me of people I used to meet in Vegas who had the same notions. "If I get ahead this much..." or "If I win (or lose) this many hands in a row....." or "If I only play (X) amount of hours per day...".

Please understand that if you are trading a setup that has a positive expectation--- then you take every single trade that fits that criteria. Any statistic (or crazy notion) that you may come up with that leads you to believe otherwise is not sound logic. These trades don't know how much you are up or down, how many in a row you've won or lost -- or -- whether or not they are even taken during the same trading session.

Now if you have trouble going on tilt and sticking to your own plan, then I have no answer for you other than QUIT. I'm about sick of seeing foolish, unsound advice being tossed out as acceptable -- in order to coddle people who have discipline issues, trade too large, or too frequently, do not grasp basic math or know how to keep simple statistics.

Positive expectation trades are profitable over the long run. Take them! Negative ones are not. It doesn't matter how you click the mouse, slouch in your chair, walk away from the screen, how many you have won (or lost) in a row, whether you have argued with your spouse that morning, your kids are sick, how your confidence is running. None of this matters if you have made a trade with a positive expectation.

Peace,
Paige

Like many on this thread, you boil trading down to repetition and logic.

As opposed to skill (and to some degree repetition and logic).

All of the things you mention in your last paragraph can impact your performance in any endeavor. Trading is certainly not immune to life putting you off your game.

If you have any questions about the products or services provided, please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io "Ask Me Anything" thread
Reply With Quote
 
  #25 (permalink)
Elite Member
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker/Data: various
Favorite Futures: futures
 
Posts: 2,212 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,010 given, 4,017 received

Futures Edge on FIO

Which products do you trade?

 

Anagami View Post

The individual trades are NOT independent events, when your approach is consistent.


Can you share any proof that your statement is true?

I strongly disagree with this. I have dozens of systems, each with a consistent approach to entering and exiting trades, and every analysis I have done has said the individual trades are independent events.

If you have any questions please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io "Ask Me Anything" thread
Reply With Quote
The following 5 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
  #26 (permalink)
Elite Member
Winnipeg, Canada
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart
Favorite Futures: ES/ZB
 
Posts: 96 since Apr 2015
Thanks: 85 given, 153 received


Anagami View Post
Huh? I just said: "If anything, one should stop after 3 winners. "


Anagami View Post
You don't seem to grasp the simple fact that even "a setup that has a positive expectation" goes through cyclical periods of gains and losses. The individual trades are NOT independent events, when your approach is consistent. The probability of having a winning trade is not the same after, say, a string of large winners. Why? Simply because the market does not keep on doing exactly the same thing. And if your trading method is consistent trade to trade, the probability of a winner goes down after a series of winners.

By saying that with trading we go through cyclical periods of gains and losses it stands to reason that we are unsure of what kind of trade outcome will happen next. From this you mean (from what i understand) it would not be wise to stop trading after having some losses because the next trade could likely be a winning one (as per your earlier post).

Alright makes sense, but yet with that same reasoning it would also be just as unwise to stop after having some winners because one still does not know for how long that winning streak may last (which is why i posed the question earlier as to what makes it okay to stop after winning trades instead of losing ones). and if you do stop, how do you know when to start taking your setups again? once you stop taking any trade that changes the statistical outcome that your system has of your "positive expectation setup". the likely reason it has a positive expectation is because those setups are executed 100% of the time all the time.

This is the issue i have with mechanical type trading. Once you change one thing, miss one trade, etc. the parameters of executing that system has changed therefore the outcome of the next trade (as if it could be somehow predicted in the first place) has also changed. If we are losing in the markets its best to probably evaluate why these trades are not working (mechanical or not). it is most likely because the "setup" being taken is not suited for the current market conditions/environment. so yes its quite wise to stop trading and not continue taking bad trades.

Reply With Quote
 
  #27 (permalink)
Trading for Fun
Gainesville, Florida, United S
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: TWS
Broker/Data: IB
Favorite Futures: Stocks
 
Posts: 66 since Dec 2010
Thanks: 30 given, 104 received

OK, let's try to make it very simple.

If you attempt to call (an unbiased) coin toss for $50 per toss -- your expectation is zero (or breakeven) over 1000 tosses. Win $25,000/Lose $25,000.
Now, if you decided to randomly bet $100 on some tosses, $1 on some tosses and $1000 on others --- your results would likely be clustered around the results from the tosses where you had the higher bets. But still, each individual toss had a 50% chance of winning (or zero expectation) -- regardless of how much you happened to be ahead or behind after the 1000 tosses. None of those tosses knew how much you had bet on them --- or were influenced by that in any way. (this, by the way, is the most common trap that many would-be gamblers fall into -- the illogical belief that they can somehow manage/bet their money in a certain way as to overcome a negative expectation)

So let's go back and examine those 1000 coin tosses and look for patterns, shall we. Hmm, looks like you lost 70% of the tosses following 3 wins in a row? So, you deduct that you have a 70% chance of losing future tosses that follow 3 consecutive wins, right? Sorry, but no -- those 4th tosses had exactly the same expectation as the 3 prior tosses (zero). The expectation was not influenced by the previous three tosses whatsoever. I'd be willing to bet that if you looked even closer, you could find a multitude of patterns that magically appeared during those 1000 tosses. Maybe it would be statistically prudent to skip every 14th, 19th and 63rd toss -- following any streak of winning 8 out of 10 tosses? And so on...........

The chance of tossing 5 consecutive heads on an unbiased coin is 3.125%. If anyone would like to toss one until they hit 4 consecutive heads -- then lay me 1-31 that they will toss a tail on their next flip ---- I'm your girl!


Peace,
Paige


Last edited by Paige; February 5th, 2016 at 01:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to Paige for this post:
 
  #28 (permalink)
Elite Member
Winnipeg, Canada
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart
Favorite Futures: ES/ZB
 
Posts: 96 since Apr 2015
Thanks: 85 given, 153 received

I think perhaps a trap we fall into early on (myself included) is that if we have a system that proves, say 50% of our trades over a backtest of hundreds or even thousands, are profitable that must mean we have a 50% chance to make money on any 1 individual trade.

This is not true. Its this belief that makes us think that our odds of having a multiple winners or losers in a row decreases after 4 or 5 of the same. Every trade is unique from the last, I don't care if we are using the same setups over and over or whatever. The price is different, the time is different, the players involved is different, the structure and context of the rest of the market is different. Even if only slightly, its definitely different. This makes it pretty much impossible to determine the odds of any 1 single trade.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to RielA for this post:
 
  #29 (permalink)
Elite Member
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker/Data: various
Favorite Futures: futures
 
Posts: 2,212 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,010 given, 4,017 received


RielA View Post
I think perhaps a trap we fall into early on (myself included) is that if we have a system that proves, say 50% of our trades over a backtest of hundreds or even thousands, are profitable that must mean we have a 50% chance to make money on any 1 individual trade.

This is not true. Its this belief that makes us think that our odds of having a multiple winners or losers in a row decreases after 4 or 5 of the same. Every trade is unique from the last, I don't care if we are using the same setups over and over or whatever. The price is different, the time is different, the players involved is different, the structure and context of the rest of the market is different. Even if only slightly, its definitely different. This makes it pretty much impossible to determine the odds of any 1 single trade.

I disagree. If you use the same approach (system) repeatedly, and you have thousands of historical trades over varying time, price, market structure, etc. showing that the odds of winning are 50%, then the odds of the next trade (and all future trades) are also 50%.

If you don't believe that, then the implication is that historical testing is useless, since that testing does not help you deduce the odds of future events. That is not my experience at all - when done correctly, historical testing can be extremely useful.

If you have any questions please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io "Ask Me Anything" thread
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
  #30 (permalink)
Market Wizard
London UK
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: CQG
Favorite Futures: Futures
 
xplorer's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,814 since Sep 2015
Thanks: 3,320 given, 2,387 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary

And the Can of Worms award goes to....


...AshleyQueenTrader for getting people to argue and then leaving the thread.

Reply With Quote
The following 10 users say Thank You to xplorer for this post:

Reply



futures.io > > > TECHNIQUE: After three profitable trades, skipping the next setup.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)
 

Anthony Drager: Pulling the trigger with confidence

Elite only
 

Leo Murphy: The Art and Science of Technical Analysis

Elite only
 

FuturesTrader71: Ask Me Anything

Elite only

TopstepTrader: TBA

Feb 2
 

FuturesTrader71: Understanding Price Risk vs Information Risk

Elite only

Kevin Davey: Algorithmic Trading

Elite only

Al Brooks: TBA

Elite only

Ernie Chan: Quants (TBA)

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can profitable active trades be made in ES after market hours? deepthinker80 Index Futures Trading 30 July 20th, 2016 10:09 PM
Good trades, bad trades, winning trades & losing trades AsymOlly Trading Journals 42 July 11th, 2016 11:08 AM
MedianRenko Trading Technique JohnnyCash The Elite Circle 141 July 24th, 2014 02:46 PM
Profitable sim/market replay = profitable live? nourozi NinjaTrader 7 January 20th, 2014 11:03 AM
Holy Grail trades setup zoom Traders Hideout 2 November 2nd, 2012 07:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM.

no new posts
Page generated 2017-01-24 in 0.18 seconds with 20 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.205.47.26