NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





What is the Real Risk of Trading


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one algorithmic with 7 posts (6 thanks)
    2. looks_two grausch with 4 posts (7 thanks)
    3. looks_3 deaddog with 4 posts (11 thanks)
    4. looks_4 rahulgopi with 3 posts (6 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one deaddog with 2.8 thanks per post
    2. looks_two rahulgopi with 2 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 grausch with 1.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 algorithmic with 0.9 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 5,327 views
    2. thumb_up 40 thanks given
    3. group 9 followers
    1. forum 23 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

What is the Real Risk of Trading

  #1 (permalink)
 
rahulgopi's Avatar
 rahulgopi 
milpitas, ca, usa
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, Ameritrade
Trading: ES, Gold, 10 Yr
Posts: 1,723 since Feb 2014
Thanks Given: 1,389
Thanks Received: 4,206

I realized that a lot of our conversation around Risk and Loss is not conducive for an optimal mindset for trading. As a matter of fact, the concept of risk and loss as we see in other life situations doesn't apply for trading. Understanding this will help us see the real opportunity in "Risk and Loss" while trading.

Trading is based on probability. Any given trade has a probability to Win BIG or Loose Small. Loosing small is a mandatory requirement for Winning Big and letting the probability to work in the long run.

As you can see any system with a positive expectancy will produce a profit in the long run Provided we take small looses on the way. It is how probability works.

In conclusion, If you are using a system with positive expectancy and have the discipline to follow it, there is no Risk in trading, there is only Opportunity to either Win Big or Loose small in any trade for the greater good of turning a profit in the long run.

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Futures True Range Report
The Elite Circle
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
61 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
39 thanks
Battlestations: Show us your trading desks!
26 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
24 thanks
The Program
17 thanks
  #3 (permalink)
 
paps's Avatar
 paps 
SF Bay Area + CA/US
 
Experience: None
Platform: TS, TOS, Ninja(Analytics)
Trading: NQ CL, ES when volatile mrkts
Posts: 1,739 since Oct 2011
Thanks Given: 2,176
Thanks Received: 1,726


@rahulgopi my man.

You seem to hit it on the nail.
the trick is always to loose small.

Care to shed some light on how should a trader do it Provided he..she already has an edge or post expectancy.

Stops.. Etc?

Cheers
s

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4 (permalink)
 
deaddog's Avatar
 deaddog 
Prince George BC Canada
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: National Bank Direct
Broker: NBD/BMO/Questrade
Trading: Stocks
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 1,283 since May 2013
Thanks Given: 183
Thanks Received: 3,962


rahulgopi View Post

In conclusion, If you are using a system with positive expectancy and have the discipline to follow it, there is no Risk in trading, there is only Opportunity to either Win Big or Loose small in any trade for the greater good of turning a profit in the long run.

Exactly!!!

As traders the only thing we have control over is when we enter and exit the trades we make.

"The days when I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, I have really good days" RW Hubbard
Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #5 (permalink)
algorithmic
 
Posts: 29 since Feb 2015
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 19

real risk of trading is beyond profit or loss . you loose your time ,your best times that can be spend wit family ,friends, etc.. you glaze your eyes over charts and you will have a virtual life. you lose at least 5 years of your age in order to find a trading system. ( i can not believe anyone can find a system less than 4-5 years of trying hard)
but speaking in terms of real risk ,there is no guarantee about the risk , even if you risk 1% of your equity ,there would be the possibility of 100 times of loss in a row.every thing is possible , so modeling risk in mathematical manner is just making yourself fool. Nichols Nasim Taleb (PHD in statistics)says : even in the best financial engineering departments in universities,there would be nothing more than wrong ideas and pseudo science .
some years ago two Nobel Prize winners of Economy science ,started a investment fund in USA. they implemented all modern theories and mathematical aspects of controlling risk .but their fund fell in the market .as a human we can not measure "real risk" of anything.trading is not an exception

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)
 grausch 
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Stocks
Posts: 494 since May 2012
Thanks Given: 1,731
Thanks Received: 1,159


algorithmic View Post
real risk of trading is beyond profit or loss . you loose your time ,your best times that can be spend wit family ,friends, etc.. you glaze your eyes over charts and you will have a virtual life. you lose at least 5 years of your age in order to find a trading system. ( i can not believe anyone can find a system less than 4-5 years of trying hard)
but speaking in terms of real risk ,there is no guarantee about the risk , even if you risk 1% of your equity ,there would be the possibility of 100 times of loss in a row.every thing is possible , so modeling risk in mathematical manner is just making yourself fool. Nichols Nasim Taleb (PHD in statistics)says : even in the best financial engineering departments in universities,there would be nothing more than wrong ideas and pseudo science .
some years ago two Nobel Prize winners of Economy science ,started a investment fund in USA. they implemented all modern theories and mathematical aspects of controlling risk .but their fund fell in the market .as a human we can not measure "real risk" of anything.trading is not an exception

Taleb is right in that a lot of the investment / portfolio and risk management taught at university is a pseudo-science. It is all based on trying to fit into the current accepted efficient market model which implies that all of us on this forum are wasting our time since we can't beat the market anyway.

The two Nobel Prize winners (Myron Scholes and Robert Merton) did not start LTCM, it was started by John Meriwether who was a top bond trader at Salomon Brothers. If I recall correctly they were involved as partners, but it did not sound like they were that involved in the day-to-day trading of the fund. LTCM traded statiscal arbitrage strategies and these strategies are based on correlation between instruments staying roughly the same. If these correlation stay the same, you can model how prices should behave. This worked extremely well for LTCM until Russia defaulted on its debt and several of the correlations did not hold. LTCM could have survived, but they martingaled onto their existing losers and it just snowballed out of control. It was mostly ego that caused those losses. The book "When Genius Failed" goes into a lot more detail than I can here.

Regarding the "measuring of real risk", most strategies that use stop-losses and concentration limits are quite good at limiting risk. They don't really try and "measure" risk, but those strategies know how much an account can lose if all stops are hit and executed within defined slippage parameters. Thus, it is easier to control risk, but measuring risk with VAR tends to be a pointless exercise.

On another note, your entire account is always at risk - your broker can declare bankruptcy at any time...

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #7 (permalink)
algorithmic
 
Posts: 29 since Feb 2015
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 19

i agree with you,they did not consider Russia as a major risk in their portfolio.the fact is that we as human kind are UNABLE to measure risks .with stop loss we just limit our risks and at the other hand we "increase" opportunity factor of risking.it's possible to have 100 losing trades in a row.even if you risk 1% of your equity.BTW i think "real risk" of trading is somehow much more than what we consider .it's been always my own question that if reward (money) of trading is greater than it's hidden risk...

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)
 
deaddog's Avatar
 deaddog 
Prince George BC Canada
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: National Bank Direct
Broker: NBD/BMO/Questrade
Trading: Stocks
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 1,283 since May 2013
Thanks Given: 183
Thanks Received: 3,962


algorithmic View Post
even if you risk 1% of your equity ,there would be the possibility of 100 times of loss in a row.every thing is possible , so modeling risk in mathematical manner is just making yourself fool.

If you risk 1% of your capital your risk will be reduced as your capital is depleted. After 100 losses you would still have about 1/3 of your capital remaining.

After 10 losses in a row I would take a long hard look at my trading strategy, and more than likely reduce my risk per trade until I determined the problem.

My record is 23 losses in a row. The problem was the trader not the strategy.

"The days when I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, I have really good days" RW Hubbard
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)
algorithmic
 
Posts: 29 since Feb 2015
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 19

as long as your equity is reducing , your risk will be INCREASED.if you 've a modest trading account of 10k and each time you risk only 100$,whenever your equity is 8k,then 100$ is not 1% of your equity .
as you pointed, draw downs have additional pressure on mind , so they are additional hidden risk too

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)
 
rahulgopi's Avatar
 rahulgopi 
milpitas, ca, usa
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, Ameritrade
Trading: ES, Gold, 10 Yr
Posts: 1,723 since Feb 2014
Thanks Given: 1,389
Thanks Received: 4,206



algorithmic View Post
as long as your equity is reducing , your risk will be INCREASED.if you 've a modest trading account of 10k and each time you risk only 100$,whenever your equity is 8k,then 100$ is not 1% of your equity .
as you pointed, draw downs have additional pressure on mind , so they are additional hidden risk too

The key is to have a system with positive expectancy and have the discipline to follow it. IS there a probability to get all loosing trades in a row and washout your account? probable but chances are very less. We are emotional beings, once we see a number of losers, the first intention is to tweak the system or to look for a new one. Traders who succeed are the ones who have confidence in their method, have the gut to follow it, not to be fearful about handful of losses as they know the probability will work in the long run.

A casino is a good example of a system with positive expectancy that work in the long run. It is the law of big numbers and probability. Most games have a very slight edge for the casino but it will work in favor of casino with a large number of plays.

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on March 1, 2015


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts