"Easiest" performance metrics to achieve? - Psychology and Money Management | futures.io
futures.io futures trading

Go Back   futures.io

> Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Psychology and Money Management

"Easiest" performance metrics to achieve?
Started:November 29th, 2013 (03:54 AM) by sixtyseven Views / Replies:279 / 1
Last Reply:November 29th, 2013 (03:54 AM) Attachments:0

Welcome to futures.io.

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Thread Tools Search this Thread

"Easiest" performance metrics to achieve?

Old November 29th, 2013, 03:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Golden Bay, New Zealand
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: Sierra Chart
Favorite Futures: ES
Posts: 94 since May 2012
Thanks: 511 given, 144 received

"Easiest" performance metrics to achieve?

Firstly, the title of the thread is not meant to imply this is "easy", only that some paths are easier than others.

I have two questions:-

1. What type of setup do you believe is easier to develop/discover?

Assume both have the same biggish size stop, both use 1 contract (same risk) and only 1 trade a day.
a. R:R of 1 with a win% of 60%
b. R:R of 3 with a win% of 30%

Both end up with the same net profit - but likely require different methods to get there.

With "A" you will probably use one market and be flat at the end of the day. With "B" you would likely hold the winners multiple days, and probably be looking at multiple markets to find the trigger.

2. Which of the above do you believe to be the better metrics to aim for if you remove the same size stop, 1 contract and 1 trade a day restrictions?

Actually, there are sort of restrictions in that the risk has to still be similar and within account size tolerances. Stop size would/could vary however based on the prevailing market conditions

Pro's of "A" as far as I can see.
1. The higher win rate will have a smoother equity curve - which is probably easier on the mind.
2. It will have a lower std dev of returns so you can probably risk more.
3. As you are trading one market you will know it more 'intimately'. It might therefore be easier to find an additional system or refine the current.
4. You'd likely go all-in-all-out and be involved less in trade management - perhaps easier on the mind, and free up time for research (or looking for 2nd / 3rd entries)

Pro's of "B" as far as I can see.
1. More room to move in improving win% over A, with each %gain resulting in more profit. (I don't know if a 1% gain in "B" would be easier or the same to find as a 1% gain in "A")
2. Involved more in trade mgmt (to let the winners run), and the experience gained here could improve profit over time.
3. Potentially the entry timing wouldn't need to be as refined (as you'd probably have a bigger stop), and so you might not need to be as glued to the screen as you would in "A". This would free up time for research.

I'm trying to decide on the 'best' direction to focus my efforts. I've moved away from the idea of small stops due to the transaction costs (thanks to @djkiwi for his s/sheet) - for some it's a viable method they make it work - and that's great. But I want to get the most with the smallest effort. By that I mean working smart, rather than being lazy.

Reply With Quote

Old November 29th, 2013, 03:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
Quick Summary
Quick Summary Post

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.



futures.io > Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Psychology and Money Management > "Easiest" performance metrics to achieve?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

NinjaTrader 8: Programming Profitable Trading Edges w/Scott Hodson

Elite only

Anthony Drager: Executing on Intermarket Correlations & Order Flow, Part 2

Elite only

Adam Grimes: Five critically important keys to professional trading

Elite only

Machine Learning Concepts w/FIO member NJAMC

Elite only

MarketDelta Cloud Platform: Announcing new mobile features

Dec 1

NinjaTrader 8: Features and Enhancements

Dec 6

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Extremes", "highest/lowest" functions affecting maxbarback LastSyndrome Elite EasyLanguage Automated Trading 3 September 1st, 2012 05:38 AM
Saxo Bank's 10 "Outrageous Predictions" For "2012: The Perfect Storm" Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 December 17th, 2011 07:10 PM
Fukushima: "China Syndrome Is Inevitable" ... "Huge Steam Explosions", or "Nuclear Bo Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 November 22nd, 2011 01:50 AM
How to change "Stop Loss" and "Take Profit" in "shElderImpulse" Strategy javed759 NinjaTrader 1 November 1st, 2011 10:44 PM
"mid", "buy", "sell" volumes lokgotkent Traders Hideout 6 September 30th, 2011 01:24 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.

Copyright © 2016 by futures.io. All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts

Page generated 2016-10-28 in 0.06 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP