Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I disagree. Your reasoning assumes that the only difference between the two trader profiles is the magnitude of the profit target and stop loss. As a 'scalper' myself, I consider a huge difference is that I pay a lot less in commissions. To put the numbers in perspective: Ignoring exchange and regulatory fees, I get to trade 41100 more round trips per year than a 'swing trader' who only trades 3000 round trips per year, for free. (See the crossover in the diagram below.)
If you compare two traders, one who is allowed to trade 41100 contracts for free, and one who only trades 3000 contracts, it's clear that the former has a huge advantage.
What I'm trying to get at is that:
1. The correct conclusion to draw from any argument pertaining to commissions in a 'swing vs scalp' argument should be that traders should demand lower fees from their brokers.
I read about this sort of approach referred to as a barbell strategy (Taleb). Allocate the majority of your resources to safe strategies and a minority to more risky ones. You can repeat the the 80:20 rule within each subsequent '20' part, always finding an increasingly riskier way to use the capital. The key is the '20' parts need to have (potentially) increasingly asymmetrical returns. I had this in my trading plan once, designed to kick in once I had reached a certain profit per week/month, but never reached that level to try it out!
I get the idea that you would have a chance of the very rare but huge winner. An opportunity that you would not otherwise be exposed to. The sort of trade where you get a week long swing trade with an initial risk of just a few ticks. But who on earth would ever have the discipline not to cash it in early! Just going for way OTM options is the same way to get that kind of exposure.
The problem with your 3 point target and your 2 point stop is you are minimizing losses but you are also minimizing winners.
You want to minimize losers and maximize winners. In order to maximize winners, you'll need to implement different trade/risk management strategies.
