Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I think it gives null or divide by zero error when i calculate it in spreadsheet form. I think in my platform it goes wacky like 1000 or something. I guess you could just always have a denominator to eliminate that or come up with a flag if that does occur.
Just as a general thoughts on PF. I really like it as a measure, i think its one of the top 3 things I look at because it is risk adjusted and easy to compare against other systems. If I ever did have a system where I didn't take at least 1 loss and not have an error, I would be highly suspicious anyway.
I was wondering if there was some generally acceptable answer. I can screen for a $0 loss and replace the value with something. I was thinking around 1000 and might use that value. I would be suspicious as well with the value unless I was only expected a very rare trade due to the strategy. Just want to be able to handle the exceptions correctly (or as well accepted).