How important is entry price? - Psychology and Money Management | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


How important is entry price?
Updated: Views / Replies:2,646 / 23
Created: by Big Mike Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

How important is entry price?

  #11 (permalink)
Membership Revoked
Ontario, Canada
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: NT
Broker/Data: IB
Favorite Futures: gold
 
dario1's Avatar
 
Posts: 405 since Jan 2012
Thanks: 62 given, 52 received


Big Mike View Post

How important is entry

Mike

Not as important as exit -- at least for me.

And yes, it can be argued, but even a bad entry can be turned around with a good exit.
But bad exit -- well… we all know what that means
D

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to dario1 for this post:
 
  #12 (permalink)
Elite Member
DFW, Texas
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: Stocks
 
Posts: 18 since Dec 2011
Thanks: 0 given, 25 received

Damn certain I would not want to enter a stock – currently trading at $25.00 – at $100.00 – so from that perspective price is important…

That said

Entering the correct direction is infinitely more important than the price – especially in a trending mkt – assuming that trend is not/ or close to - ending of course


However in a ranging mkt – people keep getting the false impression they can actually trade – irrespective of direction or price

Interesting phenomena to say the least


RN

Reply With Quote
 
  #13 (permalink)
Elite Member
Austin, TX
 
Futures Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Favorite Futures: CL, NG, TF, NQ, YM, GC, ES
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 
Posts: 862 since Jun 2011
Thanks: 609 given, 1,051 received


It is all important imo. Entry is just the start of a chain of events that constitute a trade. It is very important but no more important than stops and targets. I don't believe can have an edge without a good entry but only way to fully exploit that edge in a successful way you must have good exits. All works together for your success or demise if don't do it right.

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to liquidcci for this post:
 
  #14 (permalink)
Fortitudo et Honor
Austin, TX
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: Futures
 
Posts: 882 since Mar 2011
Thanks: 128 given, 703 received

When looking at trade efficiencies, both entry efficiency, exit efficiency and overall efficiency...

Entries will deterimine the maximum amount of profit you CAN possibly make on a given trade. Exits will determine how much of that potential profit you squeeze out.

Marginal or lackluster entries can be masked by good exits....usually, the market will show you runups and drawdowns (in some amount) for just about every trade (unless you're ultra scalping or HFT). Your ability to exit at a point of profit is usually easier than trying to figure out a better edge/entry point.

I guess the easiest way to explain it is that it's MUCH easier to wring out profits by getting good at exits, which is why most people do and should focus on exits. There's a much larger spectrum and distribution to your profits when considering exits alone.

Entries are tough to adjust and have any REAL appreciable impact in the entry efficiency. When you trial to dial in your edge, usually, it comes at a cost (increase sensitivity and it usually includes false signals, decrease sensistivity and it will weed out some losers, but also some winners too).

Entry edge is very important, but because most traders are lucky to find a 5 to 10% edge equivalent, they focus more on exits where there might be a 20-40% swing in how much profit you're able to make.

"A dumb man never learns. A smart man learns from his own failure and success. But a wise man learns from the failure and success of others."
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to RM99 for this post:
 
  #15 (permalink)
Elite Member
Perdido Beach, AL
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: graph paper
Favorite Futures: Guitar
 
websouth's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,150 since Jul 2009
Thanks: 1,094 given, 1,299 received

How important is entry price?
There may be a perfect "entry" price but I am not sure how you would know what it is or how important it was until after the fact. "Wow great entry" or "whoa my entry stinks." We have all said that as the trade develops. How much of it was under our control?

Entry price importance also would be highly individualistic and depend on risk profile, trade style, etc. The overall risk to you personally on the trade is what you can control and all that matters. This includes your exit, your size, your broker, your backup power or plans, and any other factors you control. It matters how the particular trade/bet affects you only. Everyone will be different in this regard. To say the entry is very important may imply that you have a certain amount of predictive ability. You may - and you could work on developing this - but that is certainly not the part that you have the most control over.

www.fooledbyrandomness.com/probability.pdf
============
excerpt -

2- Exposures to X Should Not Be Confused With Knowledge About X --and They Are

Exposure, not knowledge.
Next we go into a deeper set of problems less obvious in the discourse, that have a severe philosophical
consequence. The confusion is as follows. Take X a random or nonrandom variable, and F(X) the exposure, payoff, the effect of X on you, the end bottom line. (To be technical, X is higher dimensions, but let's assume for the sake of the examples in the introduction that it is a simple one-dimensional variable).


X is arsenic, coffee, or aspirin, F(X) is the response of your body to the ingestion of arsenic, coffee, or aspirin (obviously the dose response is extremely nonlinear making F complicated).
X can be a shock hitting a coffee cup, F(X) is the response in change in value of the coffee cup and its utility for you.
X is a “prediction”, F(X) is how it affects me.
X can be rain, F(X) is the effect of rain on you.
X is unemployment in Senegal, F 1 (X) is the effect on the bottom line of the IMF, and F 2 (X) is the effect on your grandmother (which I assume is minimal).
X can be a stock price, but you own an option on it, so F(X) is your exposure an option value for X, or, even more complicated the utility of the exposure to the option value.
X can be changes in wealth, F(X) the convex-concave value function of Kahneman-Tversky, how these “affect” you. One can see that F(X) is vastly more stable or robust than X.

Limitations of knowledge.
What is crucial, our limitations of knowledge apply to X not necessarily to F(X). We have no control over X, some
control over F(X). In some cases a very, very large control over F(X).

My point is that we should not confuse “knowledge” of X with that of F(X), the effect of the payoff, an error often made, actually, almost always made. And “knowledge of X” does not crudely translate in knowledge of F(X); F(X) is the full package, the beginning and end package.

F(X) needs to be computed in a completely different manner, as we will see, using all possible values of X. This seems naive, but people do, as something is lost in the translation.

My irritation with the treatment of the Black Swan problem is as follows: people focus on X (“predicting X”). My point although we do not understand X, we can deal with it by working on F which we can understand, while others work on predicting X which we can’t because small probabilities are incomputable, particularly in “fat tailed” domains. F(X) is how the end result affects you.

The probability distribution of F(X) is markedly different from that of X, particularly when F(X) is nonlinear. We need a nonlinear transformation of the distribution of X to get F(X). We had to wait until 1964 to get a paper on “convex transformations of random variables”, Van Zwet (1964).
Bad news: F is almost always nonlinear.

The central point about what to understand: When F(X) is convex, say as in trial and error, or with an option, we do not need to understand X as much as our exposure to H. Simply the statistical properties of X are swamped by those of H. That's the point of Antifragility in which exposure is more important than the naive notion of "knowledge", that is, understanding X.

“Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” - Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
 
  #16 (permalink)
Elite Member
Philadelphia
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: corded black telephone
Favorite Futures: ticker tape
 
Itchymoku's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,892 since Apr 2012
Thanks: 1,681 given, 3,622 received

Yes there are certainly better entries than others, But more important IMO Is that you're in a steady trend with your stop placed just below the previous swing low with a significant expectancy. I Think this strategy usually gives sufficient leeway to catch a move and or determine if you're indeed wrong with out having to worry so much about having a favorite place to get chopped apart.

Reply With Quote
 
  #17 (permalink)
Elite Member
NY, NY
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: T4, NinjaTrader
Favorite Futures: All!
 
patbateman's Avatar
 
Posts: 235 since Mar 2012
Thanks: 113 given, 193 received


trendisyourfriend View Post
If you think entry is important then you'd use tools like the Footprint, DOM or Tape reading. If you think a bit deeper then you will realise that the exit determines if you have done any profit. But to be realist, to make money, your entry and exit need to be perfect

This question reminds me about this old adage about the blind men and the elephant

The problem with this analysis is that you do not control your exit price, you only control when you exit. You control your entry price and entry time.

This is why most market orders are selling, not buying.

Buy at a great price, sell for a decent price. Not buy at a great price, sell at a great price.

"A Jedi's strength flows from the force."
-Yoda
Reply With Quote
 
  #18 (permalink)
Elite Member
Bala, PA, USA
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: Mirus, IB
Favorite Futures: SPY, Oil, Euro
 
monpere's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,858 since Jul 2010
Thanks: 300 given, 3,276 received

If your targets are 150 ticks then your entry may not be all that important, but if your targets are 5 ticks, then your entry is absolutely crucial.

Reply With Quote
 
  #19 (permalink)
Trading for Fun
Los Angeles
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: x_trader
Favorite Futures: Stocks
 
ReaM's Avatar
 
Posts: 127 since Mar 2011
Thanks: 96 given, 95 received


websouth View Post
There may be a perfect "entry" price but I am not sure how you would know what it is or how important it was

Could you please explain me in a human language what the error of Fukushima was? Sounds interesting, the article, except I don't understand a word haha.


patbateman View Post
The problem with this analysis is that you do not control your exit price, you only control when you exit. You control your entry price and entry time.

This is why most market orders are selling, not buying.

Buy at a great price, sell for a decent price. Not buy at a great price, sell at a great price.

Could you please expand on that? Is there an article I can read about market orders dominating on short side. I mean, it makes sense that it should be that way, but I have never thought about it. Market crashes are basically market orders hitting the market. Really never thought about it. Good to know.

You were talking about taking profits too, but I cant relate to that one. I would like to hear more, please!


Last edited by ReaM; September 3rd, 2012 at 05:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #20 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Melbourne Victoria Australia
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: meta trader
Favorite Futures: Forex
 
Posts: 7 since Sep 2012
Thanks: 5 given, 17 received


I believe entry, management and exit are all important like spokes in a wheel, if one is weak then the integrity is weakened.

Cheers

Itsallinthemind

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > How important is entry price?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Jigsaw Trading: TBA

Elite only

FuturesTrader71: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

Jan 18

RandBots: TBA

Jan 23

GFF Brokers & CME Group: Futures & Bitcoin

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Important threads. kashmiami Traders Hideout 1 August 23rd, 2012 03:06 PM
Display volume, ticks at entry and profit target price level GSREDDY The Elite Circle 1 August 14th, 2012 02:50 AM
TT's Avg Entry Price issue tomgilb Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 15 January 12th, 2012 01:59 PM
is commission price transparency important ? wwwingman Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 7 December 19th, 2011 03:28 PM
Using Limit entry, how to know if entry was execute - Multicharts arjfca EasyLanguage Programming 11 November 24th, 2010 05:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 PM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-16 in 0.15 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.227.51.103