Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I am trying to work out which risk management approach is best for me. Bearing in mind I am a beginner trader and I need to tame my "monkey", I am willing to sacrifice profit for a strategy that is easy on the ego. Before you jump down my throat I realise that a good trader needs to learn to take losses. I know that. There are various approaches to risk management that I've found:
All in, scale out, move stop to breakeven after trade has moved 1R in favour
Scale in, all out, no stop movement
Scale in, all out, trailing stop with each scale-in
Scale in, scale out
I intend to do some modelling and testing using the market replay feature of NinjaTrader and may do a YouTube video of it and post it up for you, but I would love to hear what experienced, consistently profitable traders do. I do realise that the risk management model must suit the personality of the trader, and I am seeking a risk management model that is easy to trade, and am willing to sacrifice performance (in terms of reward) for consistency and a smoother equity curve. It's easier on the "monkey".
You have to find the method that works best for you, your style, your method, your personality, your risk aversion, your thrill seeking, etc.
You have already compiled a list of the popular methods, so unless you are not understanding how they work, I am afraid that you are really on your own here. You have to use trial and error and find the one that "speaks to you".
I would not place much emphasis on what others say works for them in this regard, because it is just too "personal" meaning it is what works for them and we are not all the same. Better to find what works for you.
Only comment I have about your list is the trailing stop and breakeven after a certain move in the market. I caution against any of these kinds of trailing stops.
Your entry is a function of the market price action, yes? Your exit, the same, yes? Why would your trailing stop be based on something that has to do with your account size? You are trading the market. You are not trading "your account size". While risk is extremely crucial in determining position sizing, I do not believe a stop (of any kind) should be a function of account size. Rather, stop is a function of the market price action, and then you must scale your position to conform with your account size (ie: not risking more than 1%).
Don't make the mistake of entering a trade and setting a stop blindly based on how much you are willing to lose. Market doesn't care about that. Set a stop where your signal is no longer valid.
Don't move your stop up (trail) during a trade for the same bad reasons. A stop should be moved up if you have a reason based on market action to do so.
No doubt, it is much harder to master this. And I think it is fine for beginners to use trailing stops to help them along, but you should break away from this as soon as possible, because using such an arbitrary trailing stop is going to hurt you far more than help you. For example, you will get taken out of a trade and find yourself thinking "This trade is still valid, why am I flat?"
I am afraid you will need to actually be a good trader in order to trade well. There is no short cut, including a magic trailing stop indicator or ATM template.
And possibly even consider tailoring the risk management strategy for the conditions. For example in a quiet trading range, enter on limit orders and go all-in all-out with tight stops and targets. In a trend, possibly scale-in on pullbacks and then get out all at once when there's a strong reversal signal.
I am attracted to the scale-in, all out approach because it means that losers will be small if the initial position is wrong. But then it could be psychologically difficult to add a position and give yourself a worse average price.
Hmm, I guess what I'll have to do is try various styles and find one that works for me.
What I meant is that I see people constantly looking for a shortcut. The desired effect of this shortcut is to trade better.
I understand the search, but I think it is the wrong path. A golfer might constantly look for better clubs, better balls, better gloves, shoes, etc... but none of those things are going to improve the score when the golfer can't control his temper, loses control, doesn't follow his rules, etc.
Searching for the "right parameters" of a trailing stop, indicator or ATM or otherwise, is a move down this wrong path in my opinion.
What I meant by my comment was that if you want to get the most out of a trade, there is no shortcut for actually being a good trader.
What may keep you in the trade today will take you out tomorrow, for no reason other than your indicator settings. This is why I am a discretionary trader and not a mechanical trader. I prefer to make my own decisions, but I was once very much addicted to a long set of rules and conditions (primarily created by indicator combinations). I finally realized they were hurting me and holding me back, so I got rid of them and decided to work on actually improving myself as a trader, instead of working on becoming a better indicator creator or working to become a better parameter setter.