NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Auto trading is only thing that conquered my darkside


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one liquidcci with 71 posts (65 thanks)
    2. looks_two monpere with 54 posts (53 thanks)
    3. looks_3 sidney7g with 45 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Xeno with 33 posts (11 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one RM99 with 1.1 thanks per post
    2. looks_two monpere with 1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 liquidcci with 0.9 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Xeno with 0.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 73,236 views
    2. thumb_up 208 thanks given
    3. group 35 followers
    1. forum 358 posts
    2. attach_file 16 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Auto trading is only thing that conquered my darkside

  #111 (permalink)
 RM99 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: Futures
Posts: 839 since Mar 2011
Thanks Given: 124
Thanks Received: 704


rpm123 View Post
The more mechanical I become following my ruleset, the better day I have. Bots seems a logical extension. Not there yet, and I would not leave it unattended for at least 6 months, but I can see the advantage.

There is still no grail with respect to "hands free" or unattended trading.

Autotrading is still very much cruise control (you still have to be at the wheel). Coding bugs, connection interruptions, etc.

You can leave your auto strategy unattended, but not without risk. The only solution for unattended is still to hire someone to babysit for you while you golf.

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
New Micros: Ultra 10-Year & Ultra T-Bond -- Live Now
Treasury Notes and Bonds
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
61 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
39 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
26 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
18 thanks
The Program
18 thanks
  #112 (permalink)
 dutchbookmaker 
NYC
 
Posts: 187 since Dec 2010

From my experience people don't like algorithmic trading because you can't hide so easily behind nonsense like "psychology" and all this other garbage from retail trading literature to mask the fact that your trades have negative expectancy.
When you try to turn your "discretionary" setups into algorithms you quickly see how much of your trading "intuition" or whatever you want to call it is really nothing more than noise, false perceptions and randomness.

Reply With Quote
  #113 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,396 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,172
Thanks Received: 101,536



dutchbookmaker View Post
From my experience people don't like algorithmic trading because you can't hide so easily behind nonsense like "psychology" and all this other garbage from retail trading literature to mask the fact that your trades have negative expectancy.
When you try to turn your "discretionary" setups into algorithms you quickly see how much of your trading "intuition" or whatever you want to call it is really nothing more than noise, false perceptions and randomness.

Trading Psychology is not garbage. It directly accounts for why most people have no problem making money on sim, yet most people lose trading cash.

If your methodology is flawed and has negative expectancy, then psychology is not going to help you change that. But if your method is sound, yet requires discretion and cannot be programmed, then psychology plays an important factor. Basically the factor is "execution", what your paper says to do vs what you actually do. If your paper says to hold until you have a good reason to exit, yet you exit without a good reason, that is a psychology problem of poor execution. The method was sound, you failed to execute it.

You can have a good, solid, positive expectancy method and it not be automated or it not be within most peoples realms of possibility to automate it due to the discretionary element involved. Just like only recently massive supercomputers can now beat someone at Jeopardy, if you don't have the proper hardware sophistication or engineering software capabilities it is my opinion most strategies cannot compete with a good, solid, competent discretionary trader.

That said, if you change the game --- it's no longer Jeopardy for instance, now it's HFT Jeopardy, then obviously the human player, the discretionary trader, has no hope of winning because HFT is what the computer does best.

Strategies should do what computers do best. Computers don't do everything better than us.

I don't want to come in and "stomp" on this thread because most people know I have negative views on automation and advise the majority of people to not pursue it. So I will try to keep a distance. Discussion is good, and I will try to refrain from posting further in the thread so you guys can continue on with a productive conversation without me. So that is my reason for not replying, if you are expecting me to do so...

Thx for the good thread.

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #114 (permalink)
 Xeno 
UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja
Broker: Mirus/Zen
Trading: Futures - bonds, currencies, index
Posts: 288 since Oct 2010
Thanks Given: 70
Thanks Received: 274

Mike - there are a few people on this thread that would support a new forum called something like

"Automated trading and testing"

How about it?

Reply With Quote
  #115 (permalink)
 
monpere's Avatar
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
Posts: 1,854 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 300
Thanks Received: 3,371


Big Mike View Post
Trading Psychology is not garbage. It directly accounts for why most people have no problem making money on sim, yet most people lose trading cash.

If your methodology is flawed and has negative expectancy, then psychology is not going to help you change that. But if your method is sound, yet requires discretion and cannot be programmed, then psychology plays an important factor. Basically the factor is "execution", what your paper says to do vs what you actually do. If your paper says to hold until you have a good reason to exit, yet you exit without a good reason, that is a psychology problem of poor execution. The method was sound, you failed to execute it.

You can have a good, solid, positive expectancy method and it not be automated or it not be within most peoples realms of possibility to automate it due to the discretionary element involved. Just like only recently massive supercomputers can now beat someone at Jeopardy, if you don't have the proper hardware sophistication or engineering software capabilities it is my opinion most strategies cannot compete with a good, solid, competent discretionary trader.

That said, if you change the game --- it's no longer Jeopardy for instance, now it's HFT Jeopardy, then obviously the human player, the discretionary trader, has no hope of winning because HFT is what the computer does best.

Strategies should do what computers do best. Computers don't do everything better than us.

I don't want to come in and "stomp" on this thread because most people know I have negative views on automation and advise the majority of people to not pursue it. So I will try to keep a distance. Discussion is good, and I will try to refrain from posting further in the thread so you guys can continue on with a productive conversation without me. So that is my reason for not replying, if you are expecting me to do so...

Thx for the good thread.

Mike

I whole heartedly agree with this post. Here's the statement I have a comment on, "If your paper says to hold until you have a good reason to exit". If your trading plan says that, you will not survive very long as a discretionary trader. You will be one of those guys writing posts saying, I should have held longer, I should have exited here, I should have cut my loss here, I should have done this, I should have done that.

I believe your exit is more important then your entry. If you are going to leave your exit that vague, with no specific rules to define it, your profitability will be ruled by your emotions, and the psychological ramifications of that will be the end of your trading career. It will always cause you to say "I should have...". I don't think there are too many successful traders who have that phrase in their regular vocabulary.

Reply With Quote
  #116 (permalink)
 Xeno 
UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja
Broker: Mirus/Zen
Trading: Futures - bonds, currencies, index
Posts: 288 since Oct 2010
Thanks Given: 70
Thanks Received: 274


monpere View Post
"If your paper says to hold until you have a good reason to exit". If your trading plan says that, you will not survive very long as a discretionary
trader. You will be one of those guys writing posts saying,

Monpere - while your point is valid, I think it was just a hypothetical example where it is assumed that the 'good reasons' are defined on paper somewhere. It was just an example of not following your plan, and the difference between your plan and what you actually do being the 'psychology factor'

Reply With Quote
  #117 (permalink)
 
monpere's Avatar
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
Posts: 1,854 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 300
Thanks Received: 3,371


Xeno View Post
Monpere - while your point is valid, I think it was just a hypothetical example where it is assumed that the 'good reasons' are defined on paper somewhere. It was just an example of not following your plan, and the difference between your plan and what you actually do being the 'psychology factor'

Yeah, I understand. The point I was trying to get across is, if you find yourself regularly saying "I should have..." you will have a short trading career, because your trading methodology is not concrete enough. This kind of statement in and of itself is a sign that your trading is being affected by your psychology.

I have never said "I should have..." for any trade, ever. I have never said "That was a nice trade", I have never said "This trade should run pretty far...", etc. Every trade is the same because my method uses exact trade selection/entries/stops/targets, you cannot get more concrete then that. The market is going to give me 10 ticks, or it will take 5 ticks from me, period. Every win is 10 ticks, every loss if 5 ticks. I don't care if I make my 10 ticks, and the market moves another 100 ticks in my favor. My expectancy was calculated on that defined trade selection/entry/target. Anything outside of that is immaterial to me, and cause me no regret whatsoever, therefore I have no psychological burden in those aspects.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #118 (permalink)
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 liquidcci 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: NQ, CL
Posts: 866 since Jun 2011
Thanks Given: 610
Thanks Received: 1,091

I have a rhetorical question.

If not trading a mechanical rules based system and trade in a discretionary manner how you have any expectancy at all?

From my perspective you can't fully measure anything if discretionary because everything is always changing. To me this really means you have nothing to hang your hat on for draw downs, expected profit, probabilities or really any kind of measure.

You could say well I base that on what I did last year. Okay but discretionary is always changing so last year carries no weight with this year.

Let the debate rage on.

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #119 (permalink)
 Xeno 
UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja
Broker: Mirus/Zen
Trading: Futures - bonds, currencies, index
Posts: 288 since Oct 2010
Thanks Given: 70
Thanks Received: 274


liquidcci View Post
I have a rhetorical question.

If not trading a mechanical rules based system and trade in a discretionary manner how you have any expectancy at all?

From my perspective you can't fully measure anything if discretionary because everything is always changing. To me this really means you have nothing to hang your hat on for draw downs, expected profit, probabilities or really any kind of measure.

You could say well I base that on what I did last year. Okay but discretionary is always changing so last year carries no weight with this year.

Let the debate rage on.

Funnily enough I asked the exact same question here

and not a single discretionary trader told me how they test, or how they measure their performance.

The implication being that they don't ;-) ;-)

(and the winners are just lucky ;-) ;-) ;-)

Reply With Quote
  #120 (permalink)
 
BCNTrader's Avatar
 BCNTrader 
Barcelona, Spain
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader 7
Broker: Interactive Brokers/Kinetick
Trading: US stocks, EUR/USD
Posts: 119 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 138
Thanks Received: 108



liquidcci View Post
I have a rhetorical question.

If not trading a mechanical rules based system and trade in a discretionary manner how you have any expectancy at all?

From my perspective you can't fully measure anything if discretionary because everything is always changing. To me this really means you have nothing to hang your hat on for draw downs, expected profit, probabilities or really any kind of measure.

You could say well I base that on what I did last year. Okay but discretionary is always changing so last year carries no weight with this year.

Let the debate rage on.

Nice debate here

So, are you assuming that a mechanical rules based system never, ever, change?

I think that most discretionary traders have some kind of mechanical system and also mechanical traders make some kind of discretionary decision over her mechanical rules. Even automated strategies change over the time (usually after a big drawdown, further than past ones). In my opinion market is changing everyday, like traffic jams so many people are involved and everybody has a different reason to be there.

Mi point is, there is a mechanical trader out there using exactly the same mechanical rules for months/years? do she ever fade a trade? do she ever begin a trade before the rules are set, because she is assuming that will be true in seconds/minutes... and so on.... The same happens with auto trades (not changing it for years).

--offtopic-- ** I'm self-taught in english, not sure if I should use she/he when talking about an hypothetical person instead of specific male/female person***

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote




Last Updated on January 17, 2016


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts