NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Auto trading is only thing that conquered my darkside


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one liquidcci with 71 posts (65 thanks)
    2. looks_two monpere with 54 posts (53 thanks)
    3. looks_3 sidney7g with 45 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Xeno with 33 posts (11 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one RM99 with 1.1 thanks per post
    2. looks_two monpere with 1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 liquidcci with 0.9 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Xeno with 0.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 73,644 views
    2. thumb_up 208 thanks given
    3. group 35 followers
    1. forum 358 posts
    2. attach_file 16 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Auto trading is only thing that conquered my darkside

  #271 (permalink)
 
monpere's Avatar
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
Posts: 1,854 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 300
Thanks Received: 3,371


Massive l View Post
When you're learning, that's pretty normal.

After thousands of hours of screen time you should have a well enough developed method
where you are not saying that.

If your entries and exits are not based on concrete rules, you will always or frequently be saying "I should have..." even after 100,000 hours of screen time, even after after 700,000 trades. If your entries and exits are not the same every time, then your entries will most likely be based on greed, and your exits on fear, and most of the time there is regret associate with those.

It is amazing how much clearer your analysis of the market is, when you don't have 20 contracts on the line. Your brain will actually play tricks on you - that resistance level will all of a sudden be 20 times as threatening. That support level will vanish, only to re-appear after you are out of the trade. That's why phrases like: I didn't see this... I should have done that... are regular in the vocabulary of discretionary traders.

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
45 thanks
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
31 thanks
Bigger Wins or Fewer Losses?
24 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
22 thanks
  #272 (permalink)
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 liquidcci 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: NQ, CL
Posts: 866 since Jun 2011
Thanks Given: 610
Thanks Received: 1,091


monpere View Post
If your entries and exits are not based on concrete rules, you will always or frequently be saying "I should have..." even after 100,000 hours of screen time, even after after 700,000 trades. If your entries and exits are not the same every time, then your entries will most likely be based on greed, and your exits on fear, and most of the time there is regret associate with those. It is amazing how much clearer your analysis of the market is, when you don't have 20 contracts on the line.

Regret and self loathing, feeling of worthless followed by moments of shear exhilaration from the greed effect, conquer the world, high five, I am the man and a genius, the strut followed again by regret etc... on and on.

Sounds like emotional torture. Maybe should call it the "Trading Water boarding Method"

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #273 (permalink)
 Xeno 
UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja
Broker: Mirus/Zen
Trading: Futures - bonds, currencies, index
Posts: 288 since Oct 2010
Thanks Given: 70
Thanks Received: 274



Lornz View Post
CQG IC

The power of discretionary trading lies in placing limit orders in advance...

Actually that's a solution to a disadvantage of discretionary trading. You might even say you've been forced into advance limit orders by a drawback of discretionary ;-)

Anyway, plenty of my auto strats do advance limit orders...

Reply With Quote
  #274 (permalink)
 
monpere's Avatar
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
Posts: 1,854 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 300
Thanks Received: 3,371


Xeno View Post
Actually that's a solution to a disadvantage of discretionary trading. You might even say you've been forced into advance limit orders by a drawback of discretionary ;-)

Anyway, plenty of my auto strats do advance limit orders...

I trade range charts, and my strategies place my entry orders in advance, before the trigger bar completes, because with range charts you know the exact tick where the bar will close.

Reply With Quote
  #275 (permalink)
 
Lornz's Avatar
 Lornz 
Oslo, Norway
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: CQG, Excel
Trading: CL
Posts: 1,193 since Apr 2010


Xeno View Post
Actually that's a solution to a disadvantage of discretionary trading. You might even say you've been forced into advance limit orders by a drawback of discretionary ;-)

Anyway, plenty of my auto strats do advance limit orders...

You're missing the whole point.

First of all, it's not either/or. Some of us actually deploy various strategies simultaneously.

Second, it is clear you did not read the last sentence of my post. Different things drives the market at different times, and an agile mind is far better suited to adapt to the ever-changing variables to consider at a particular time than a computer. But if you're simply basing you entries/exits on different indicators based on price series, automation is probably the way to go.

When it comes to HFT and market making, the machine wins hands down. But as you move up in time frames, the value of intellect should become apparent.

On a third note, it seems that a lot of the readers of this thread see the world in black and white; Either you have a method automated or you are just guessing.

There actually exists something in between...

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #276 (permalink)
 
monpere's Avatar
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
Posts: 1,854 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 300
Thanks Received: 3,371


Lornz View Post
You're missing the whole point.

First of all, it's not either/or. Some of us actually deploy various strategies simultaneously.

Second, it is clear you did not read the last sentence of my post. Different things drives the market at different times, and an agile mind is far better suited to adapt to the ever-changing variables to consider at a particular time than a computer. But if you're simply basing you entries/exits on different indicators based on price series, automation is probably the way to go.

When it comes to HFT and market making, the machine wins hands down. But as you move up in time frames, the value of intellect should become apparent.

On a third note, it seems that a lot of the readers of this thread see the world in black and white; Either you have a method automated or you are just guessing.

There actually exists something in between...

Nothing wrong with guessing... as long as your guesses have a statistical foundation that says you will be right x number of times out of y.

Reply With Quote
  #277 (permalink)
 
rpm123's Avatar
 rpm123 
Green Bay WI
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: 6E
Posts: 321 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 337
Thanks Received: 466


Lornz View Post
On a third note, it seems that a lot of the readers of this thread see the world in black and white; Either you have a method automated or you are just guessing.

There actually exists something in between...

I'm thinking it is more of a natural progression, and nuanced at that.

First, you trade by the seat of your pants, ride the emotional roller coaster, try out different indicators, and blow out your account.

Second time around, you build rules for taking trades that perform well in the market, and also address your emotional limitations. You follow them most of the time, and do fairly well. But not as good as you can mark up a chart, according to your rules, would have done that day/week/month.

Then, you look to automate - thru the ATM, and ultimately thru a bot. Executing a strategy perfectly. And then fine tune the bot, when it does not do what it is suppose to do.

That is the stage I'm at. Reading the pitfalls and positives of automation here and elsewhere is helping me to fine tune my strategies to fit automation.

Thanks for the thread.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #278 (permalink)
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 liquidcci 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: NQ, CL
Posts: 866 since Jun 2011
Thanks Given: 610
Thanks Received: 1,091


Lornz View Post
You're missing the whole point.

First of all, it's not either/or. Some of us actually deploy various strategies simultaneously.

Second, it is clear you did not read the last sentence of my post. Different things drives the market at different times, and an agile mind is far better suited to adapt to the ever-changing variables to consider at a particular time than a computer. But if you're simply basing you entries/exits on different indicators based on price series, automation is probably the way to go.

When it comes to HFT and market making, the machine wins hands down. But as you move up in time frames, the value of intellect should become apparent.

On a third note, it seems that a lot of the readers of this thread see the world in black and white; Either you have a method automated or you are just guessing.

There actually exists something in between...

I think most pure mechanical traders do see the market as black and white it is just our nature. I think we also see any hybrid as a deviation from a system where you go into a black hole on being able to measure the probabilities.

I also want to clarify most of my comments on system trading revolve around day trading. I think the shorter the time frame the more essential a rules based mechanical system with no discretion becomes. In fact I believe strongly trying to day trade in a discretionary way will end badly at some point.

I think if you have a longer time frame days, weeks, months, years and do things like build options positions discretion can play a positive role. But those types of strategies give you plenty of time to maneuver like a chess game. You make educated guesses but usually get the opportunity to hedge those guesses and build wide positions that market can land and still make a profit. Where day trading is very unforgiving of any discretion.

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #279 (permalink)
 
Massive l's Avatar
 Massive l 
OR/USA
Legendary /NQ Trader
 
Experience: None
Posts: 2,129 since Mar 2011
Thanks Given: 1,859
Thanks Received: 5,106


monpere View Post
Nothing wrong with guessing... as long as your guesses have a statistical foundation that says you will be right x number of times out of y.

In that sense, automated traders as guessing too then. They build a foundation, run a backtest and see the results.
They 'guess' some more and try different parameters or indicators and run another backtest. Results are getting better. Tweak a few more things. Another backtest. Oops...I had better results before. Take out that 'guess' and
try another new 'guess'. Backtest again.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ScreenHunter_02 Jul. 06 11.22.gif
Views:	209
Size:	12.0 KB
ID:	42703  
Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #280 (permalink)
 
monpere's Avatar
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
Posts: 1,854 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 300
Thanks Received: 3,371



Massive l View Post
In that sense, automated traders as guessing too then. They build a foundation, run a backtest and see the results.
They 'guess' some more and try different parameters or indicators and run another backtest. Results are getting better. Tweak a few more things. Another backtest. Oops...I had better results before. Take out that 'guess' and
try another new 'guess'. Backtest again.

Yup. That's how I see it. I think trading in itself is about taking educated guesses. If you cannot predict with certainty the outcome of an event, you are guessing. So, to that end every bot is continually guessing with every trade, the only thing is, those guesses are not random, they are based on historical statistical analysis and derived probable outcomes.

If I give a discretionary trader a setup that is guaranteed 80% winners, guaranteed !!! I will bet you, he will disregard the stats, and he will try to cherry pick the 20% losers out of the method. And that is what will make him fail with that method.

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on January 17, 2016


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts