NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Effective risk


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one sefstrat with 3 posts (5 thanks)
    2. looks_two Blz17 with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    3. looks_3 RJay with 1 posts (2 thanks)
    4. looks_4 baruchs with 1 posts (6 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one baruchs with 6 thanks per post
    2. looks_two RJay with 2 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 sefstrat with 1.7 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Blz17 with 1 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 2,775 views
    2. thumb_up 14 thanks given
    3. group 4 followers
    1. forum 5 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Effective risk

  #1 (permalink)
 
sefstrat's Avatar
 sefstrat 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT/Matlab
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: FX majors
Posts: 285 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 20
Thanks Received: 768

Slashdot Games Story | Computer-Based System To Crack Down On Casino Card Counters

I came across this article on slashdot about card counting and realized that that card counting might be an understandable analogy for many people of why effective risk is all that matters and how that can affect your money management strategy, as discussed in the 'More contracts == less risk' thread.

In card counting you shift the odds in your favor by counting the remaining cards in the deck, so you know if there are many high value cards remaining in the deck and the dealer is showing a low value card your probability of winning is much greater.

So although you can say that a card counter and the guy sitting next to him at the table are both risking all the money they bet on each hand. Effectively, the card counter has lower risk because he is less uncertain about the outcome. Moreover, as the card counter continues playing he can increase or decrease his bet based on his level of uncertainty.

The money management strategy I use, as described in the 'More contracts==Less risk' thread, is based on the same principle. In trading we actually have it much easier than card counting, in card counting you have to continually bet small amounts even when the odds are not great otherwise you will be kicked off the table or detected very quickly. In trading you can wait until the uncertainty is low and the odds are stacked in your favor to enter a trade and even better if new information reveals that your analysis may have been wrong you can effectively pull your money off the table (often with a small amount of profit as well).

The only thing you have to be able to do is come up with a way to evaluate the probability of a move in one direction vs. the probability of movement in the other direction to determine the uncertainty and then define some conditions for entering a trade when the odds are stacked in one direction. That is not exactly trivial but it is really not very hard either IMHO, all it takes is enough screen time watching the market action and understanding why markets move the way they do (ie understand the techniques of operators, market makers, how the order book works etc..)

Understanding how to evaluate uncertainty and control exposure to risk in this way is the only thing that seperates the card counter making millions from the guy sitting next to him who is lucky if he breaks even..

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Deepmoney LLM
Elite Quantitative GenAI/LLM
Futures True Range Report
The Elite Circle
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
61 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
39 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
26 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
18 thanks
The Program
18 thanks
  #2 (permalink)
 Blz17 
Seattle
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader Interactive Brokers
Trading: 6B
Posts: 225 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 135
Thanks Received: 270


sefstrat View Post

In card counting you shift the odds in your favor by counting the remaining cards in the deck, so you know if there are many high value cards remaining in the deck and the dealer is showing a low value card your probability of winning is much greater.

But what in trading makes gives you better odds on one trade versus the next. Regardless you are still piling on more initial monetary risk when you initiate the trade with the additional contracts.

I'm not trying to be stand-offish (is that word supposed to hyphenated, I dunno) just putting out there what's on my mind.

I suppose I just don't necessarily agree with the idea that having more contracts reduces risk, in fact I believe the contrary. However, I would agree that using more then 1 contract allows for a strategy of pursuing runners but this does not alleviate the initial risk management responsibility when the initial trade is placed.

Blz

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)
 
sefstrat's Avatar
 sefstrat 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT/Matlab
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: FX majors
Posts: 285 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 20
Thanks Received: 768


The title of that thread 'More Contracts == Less Risk' is somewhat misleading to people I think.

It should be 'More Contracts -> More Control => Less Risk Exposure'

ie More contracts gives you more control which you can use to minimize your risk exposure

The reason I compare it to card counting is because in card counting you bet big when you know the odds are stacked in your favor, ie you scale your position size based on the current level of uncertainty/risk.

That implies that in order for this to work you have to have a good strategy, since by definition a good strategy should only act when the odds are favorable. Ie you only take low risk trades knowing that sometimes your analysis will be wrong and the trade will turn against you. So you close some of the positions early to cover costs and take small profit to create a safety net in case you have to stop out the other orders.

If you are taking trades that get frequently get stopped out (or have frequent large MAE) before you hit your cost/breakeven target then you have a bad strategy you need to work on identifying when NOT to trade

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4 (permalink)
 
sefstrat's Avatar
 sefstrat 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT/Matlab
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: FX majors
Posts: 285 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 20
Thanks Received: 768

After reading my first post again I realize I worded some of it badly..

The way its worded it seems to imply that you can know your exact risk beforehand in card counting.. that is not true. You can quantify the risk but that is done before all bets are placed, after the first card is dealt the risk necessarily changes based on the new information that is available. So the best you can do is estimate the risk you will face, still.. that puts the card counter at a huge advantage.

In trading it is the same situation, that is ultimately the point I was attempting to make. When I said that a good strategy should only take trades with favorable odds, I meant taking setups which have proved to have favorable odds in the past. The point of having the cost covering orders etc as a safety net is that you can continually evaluate the risk as new information unfolds and you can get out of the trade safely if it turns out that the setup was invalid.

Imagine how easy card counting would be if you could take your wager off the table if a card was dealt which increased your risk..

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)
 
RJay's Avatar
 RJay 
Hartford, CT. USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG, Kinetick
Trading: RTY
Posts: 682 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 756
Thanks Received: 787

Hi sefstrat,

I have thought about this " More contracts==Less risk " idea.

If you are looking for a fixed profit target each day, it makes a lot of sense to me.

How many times a day are you going to get that ideal setup???

If you are trading 1 contract and need 20 ticks, how many times a day can you do this trade successfully???

If you trade 4 contracts to get to your daily total of say 24 ticks.(comparable with overhead to the single contract traded)

Your trade only needs 6 ticks. One smart scalp and your done.

The number of times a day that this trade is possible is enormous compared to the 20 tick trade.

Do you really want to stare at the markets all day hoping for the big 20 tick trade or four 6 tick similar single contract trade opportunities.

Making the one good trade in the morning would allow you to take the rest of the day to do something else.

Yea, I like this idea. More contracts==Less risk

RJay

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #6 (permalink)
 baruchs 
Israel
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: pfg
Trading: eminis
Posts: 323 since Jun 2009

Hi all,
The concept " More contracts==Less risk " is the greatest money maker. Unfortunately many traders do not understand this concept. This statement is true only if a correlation between trades is less than 1. If the correlation is -1 or close to it than it is more profitable even to add a loosing strat to some winning strats.
An example (its not mine example):
You toss a fair coin.
Strat 1: Tail you win 4$ and head you lose 1$.
Your winning expectancy = 4 * 0.5 - 1 * 0.5 = 1.5$. You see that this is a profitable strat. Still you can lose your account in a rare case.
Strat 2: Tail you lose 3$ and head you win 2$. This is a losing strategy.
Now calculate what will happen if you trade them both.

In a situation of a correlation of 1 you don't lessen your risk at all. Like trading 3 contracts with the same stop and same profit target.
Now the question is what is a correlation of your trades.
If you enter a trade with several contracts and scale out the correlation is quit big. If you trade the same setup on the same instrument on different time frames, the correlation is less, but still substantial. Then you can trade the same setup on different instruments of a same sector (indexes, currency, etc..). Even lesser correlation is if you trade on different sectors, and so on.

Baruch

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on October 17, 2009


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts