NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





How much can I earn with Options?


Discussion in Options

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 20 posts (29 thanks)
    2. looks_two blb014 with 14 posts (11 thanks)
    3. looks_3 wldman with 5 posts (19 thanks)
    4. looks_4 tpredictor with 5 posts (3 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one wldman with 3.8 thanks per post
    2. looks_two PK 1 with 3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 kevinkdog with 1.5 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 blb014 with 0.8 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 31,861 views
    2. thumb_up 117 thanks given
    3. group 18 followers
    1. forum 76 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

How much can I earn with Options?

  #51 (permalink)
 
wldman's Avatar
 wldman 
Chicago Illinois USA
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Broker: IB, ToS
Trading: /ES, US Equities/Options
Frequency: Several times daily
Duration: Hours
Posts: 3,507 since Aug 2011
Thanks Given: 2,046
Thanks Received: 9,491


kevinkdog View Post
Here is a simple example:

I buy a mini S&P futures contract. I hold for a month then I sell, and I make $5000.

During that time, someone held the short side of that contract. It could have been multiple people, it could have been hedgers, it could have been speculators, doesn't matter. But you add up all the people holding that contract during that time I held it, and the amount they lost on that futures contract adds up to $5000.

My $5000 gain + their $5000 loss = $0 (zero sum)

Note I am only talking about the futures market transaction being zero sum.


Prices are not linear.

If I sold you that contract and my trade was sell to close my P/L is not related to your P/L in ANY way. The additional amount that I could have made or lost is theoretical. Number of contracts is not finite.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Are there any eval firms that allow you to sink to your …
Traders Hideout
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
Futures True Range Report
The Elite Circle
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
61 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
39 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
26 thanks
Battlestations: Show us your trading desks!
26 thanks
The Program
18 thanks
  #52 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,645 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338


wldman View Post
Prices are not linear.

If I sold you that contract and my trade was sell to close my P/L is not related to your P/L in ANY way. The additional amount that I could have made or lost is theoretical. Number of contracts is not finite.

Did I ever say your P/L was directly related to mine? No.

What is related is the sum total of all the longs and the sum total of all the shorts.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,645 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338



wldman View Post
Prices are not linear.

If I sold you that contract and my trade was sell to close my P/L is not related to your P/L in ANY way. The additional amount that I could have made or lost is theoretical. Number of contracts is not finite.


Let's use your example:

wldman buys a mini S&P Jan 1. Group X holds the short side of that contract. S&P is at 2500.

wldman sells that long contract to Kevin on Jan 31, with S&P at 2800. wldman makes 300*50 = $15K. Nice trade widman.

Now Kevin is long that contract, Group X is still short.

Kevin now sells it Feb 6 at 2700. Kevin loses 100*50 = -$5K. Kevin is obviously an idiot.

Now what about Group X? They sold short at 2500, now price is 2700. They have lost $10K

$15K - 5K - 10K = 0 (zero sum)


If this is wrong, someone please show me.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,645 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338


blb014 View Post
Thanks for your response Kevin. I think your opinion has merit from a day traders perspective.

My response was not "my opinion" it is simple math, and it applies to more than just day traders. If I stated something wrong, please correct me.

Sorry I was unable to help you understand this.

Good day.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)
 
wldman's Avatar
 wldman 
Chicago Illinois USA
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Broker: IB, ToS
Trading: /ES, US Equities/Options
Frequency: Several times daily
Duration: Hours
Posts: 3,507 since Aug 2011
Thanks Given: 2,046
Thanks Received: 9,491

I'll continue with my understanding, you continue with yours.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,645 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338


wldman View Post
I'll continue with my understanding, you continue with yours.

I am always willing to learn. Please show me exactly how anything I said is incorrect.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)
 
xplorer's Avatar
 xplorer 
London UK
Site Moderator
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: CQG
Broker: S5
Trading: Futures
Posts: 5,944 since Sep 2015
Thanks Given: 15,446
Thanks Received: 15,291

I've always wanted to chime in on the zero-sum game thing, but I've never had the chance.

In particular, when someone says "there's a buyer and a seller, one will be the winner and one will be the loser" (assuming we're talking about 1 transaction where buyer/seller are on opposite sides) that always puzzled me.

Couldn't I be buying on a downtrend for just a few ticks on a retracement, and couldn't the person who sold it to me be holding for longer and we could both end up winners? This of course assuming that both the people that entered into the transaction were flat to begin with.

Intuitively I feel this is not stricly related to the zero-sum game argument you guys are discussing but I've always wondered.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #58 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,645 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338


xplorer View Post
I've always wanted to chime in on the zero-sum game thing, but I've never had the chance.

In particular, when someone says "there's a buyer and a seller, one will be the winner and one will be the loser" (assuming we're talking about 1 transaction where buyer/seller are on opposite sides) that always puzzled me.

Couldn't I be buying on a downtrend for just a few ticks on a retracement, and couldn't the person who sold it to me be holding for longer and we could both end up winners? This of course assuming that both the people that entered into the transaction were flat to begin with.

Intuitively I feel this is not stricly related to the zero-sum game argument you guys are discussing but I've always wondered.

On any individual trade, the game is not zero sum, unless both parties enter and exit at the same time on the opposite side.

But with futures, when you take the whole aggregate sum total of all the transactions with a certain contract, that is zero sum. It is because every contract has 2 sides - a long side and a short side.

For instance, take the Dec 2017 mini S&P contract. There were millions of transactions, millions of participants, all doing different things. If you take the net gain/loss of all the long positions, it will exactly equal the net gain/loss of all the shorts. Zero Sum. In the aggregate, the winning side took from the losing side.

Doesn't mean that there weren't shorts that made money, or that there were longs that lost money. That might be confusing.

This is not how stocks work, because there is an ownership stake. Everyone here could buy Google stock, and in 5 years, we could all be winners, and that does not mean there were losers on the other side of our trades.

Hopefully I explained it well. If not, please let me know.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #59 (permalink)
 
xplorer's Avatar
 xplorer 
London UK
Site Moderator
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: CQG
Broker: S5
Trading: Futures
Posts: 5,944 since Sep 2015
Thanks Given: 15,446
Thanks Received: 15,291

Thanks Kevin, no, you explained it well and I intuitively understand the difference between stock and futures.

I think I understand what you say about taking one contract like the ES Dec '17 and summing all the longs and all the shorts you should get zero. Does that account for rollovers?

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #60 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,645 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338



xplorer View Post
Thanks Kevin, no, you explained it well and I intuitively understand the difference between stock and futures.

I think I understand what you say about taking one contract like the ES Dec '17 and summing all the longs and all the shorts you should get zero. Does that account for rollovers?

My example takes Dec 2017 contract, or any contract, by itself.

Rollovers would be accounted for with the individual contracts. Say you bought Dec 2016 contract, and held and rolled into March 2017, then rolled into June, etc. You'd have a P/L for each of those contracts. So would everyone else who held those contracts. And the aggregate of all Dec 2016 contracts is zero, of all March 2017 contracts is zero, etc.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on February 3, 2020


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts