NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





PC-SPAN


Discussion in Options

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Dudetooth with 218 posts (213 thanks)
    2. looks_two ron99 with 116 posts (55 thanks)
    3. looks_3 CafeGrande with 30 posts (4 thanks)
    4. looks_4 BlueRoo with 24 posts (5 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Dudetooth with 1 thanks per post
    2. looks_two SMCJB with 1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 ron99 with 0.5 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 BlueRoo with 0.2 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 190,716 views
    2. thumb_up 317 thanks given
    3. group 75 followers
    1. forum 610 posts
    2. attach_file 159 attachments




 
Search this Thread

PC-SPAN

  #331 (permalink)
 ron99 
Cleveland, OH
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: QST
Broker: QST, DeCarley Trading, Gain
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 3,081 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 980
Thanks Received: 5,785


Dudetooth View Post
I didn't want to keep making new posts for the fixes, but I can no longer edit my previous post and I can't manage attachments on the quick summary post. If there is a better way to manage the file please let me know.

Here is the fixed version of 04c:
-Risk module date reference for Scanner
-Grain price

Thank you for the fix.

I believe Big Mike was changing forum software yesterday and that is probably why you couldn't add the new spreadsheet to post#2.

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
29 thanks
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
25 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
Bigger Wins or Fewer Losses?
23 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
17 thanks
  #332 (permalink)
 ron99 
Cleveland, OH
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: QST
Broker: QST, DeCarley Trading, Gain
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 3,081 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 980
Thanks Received: 5,785

Here are some mods I made to the new XLS-SPAN. I added columns AI:AM to the HistData tab. The 3 in cell AI1 is my excess factor. 3 for IMx3. (note the report blanks anything you put in cells AI2+ so you need to leave them blank.)



I then added columns, B, D, F & G, to the HistPivot tab.



Delta gives you the net delta for a position. Formula is =F2*Q2*-1 for cell AJ2 and then copy and paste for all rows that have data.

Premium$ gives you the correct number. Position Net Val had a wrong number for the first date. Formula is =U2*F2*-1

Draw down and Acct Bal for IM were new columns I use when analyzing a position.
Draw Down formula is =IF(ISBLANK(AG2),0,AG2/(AB2*AI$1))
Acct Bal for IM formula is =IF(ISBLANK(AG2),0,(AC2+(AG2*-1))/(AB2*AI$1))

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #333 (permalink)
 Dudetooth 
Steubenville Ohio
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: OX, OEC, RJO
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 266 since Sep 2012
Thanks Given: 30
Thanks Received: 274



ron99 View Post
Position Net Val had a wrong number for the first date.

Found the issue. The sub for copying the entry data on the first day had two lines that shouldn't be in there.

If you go to the sub AddToPortfolio in the Risk module, towards the bottom you will see the lines:
Range("X" & x) = Range("V" & x) * -(Range("E" & x))
Range("AB" & x) = Range("Z" & x) * -(Range("E" & x))

Remove both and you should lines and you should no longer see that issue with the first day's Pos Net Val.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #334 (permalink)
uuu1965
Riga Latvia
 
Posts: 107 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 441
Thanks Received: 72


ron99 View Post
Here are some mods I made to the new XLS-SPAN. I added columns AI:AM to the HistData tab. The 3 in cell AI1 is my excess factor. 3 for IMx3. (note the report blanks anything you put in cells AI2+ so you need to leave them blank.)



I then added columns, B, D, F & G, to the HistPivot tab.



Delta gives you the net delta for a position. Formula is =F2*Q2*-1 for cell AJ2 and then copy and paste for all rows that have data.

Premium$ gives you the correct number. Position Net Val had a wrong number for the first date. Formula is =U2*F2*-1

Draw down and Acct Bal for IM were new columns I use when analyzing a position.
Draw Down formula is =IF(ISBLANK(AG2),0,AG2/(AB2*AI$1))
Acct Bal for IM formula is =IF(ISBLANK(AG2),0,(AC2+(AG2*-1))/(AB2*AI$1))

Hi,
first: thanks Dudetooth for new spreadsheet and Ron for update.
One question:
On 2015.09.02. there are such numbers:
IM for calendar spread ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1) = 1203 $
IM for calendar ratio spread ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1)/ESV5 P1740(+1) = 990 $
Is thats correct?

Reply With Quote
  #335 (permalink)
 Dudetooth 
Steubenville Ohio
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: OX, OEC, RJO
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 266 since Sep 2012
Thanks Given: 30
Thanks Received: 274


uuu1965 View Post
Hi,
first: thanks Dudetooth for new spreadsheet and Ron for update.
One question:
On 2015.09.02. there are such numbers:
IM for calendar spread ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1) = 1203 $
IM for calendar ratio spread ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1)/ESV5 P1740(+1) = 990 $
Is thats correct?

Yes ... the extra P1740 does provide that much coverage which is why there isn't much of a drop in the margin.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #336 (permalink)
uuu1965
Riga Latvia
 
Posts: 107 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 441
Thanks Received: 72


Dudetooth View Post
Yes ... the extra P1740 does provide that much coverage which is why there isn't much of a drop in the margin.

But HistPivot sheet shows 1978.9$ IM for calendar ratio spread ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1)/ESV5 P1740(+1) on 2015.09.02. (when I use "Trach Historic" function from 2015.08.10 to 2015.09.02)

Reply With Quote
  #337 (permalink)
 Dudetooth 
Steubenville Ohio
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: OX, OEC, RJO
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 266 since Sep 2012
Thanks Given: 30
Thanks Received: 274


uuu1965 View Post
But HistPivot sheet shows 1978.9$ IM for calendar ratio spread ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1)/ESV5 P1740(+1) on 2015.09.02. (when I use "Trach Historic" function from 2015.08.10 to 2015.09.02)

I'm not sure what happened for you ... I just ran those positions for those days and am not sure where $1978.9 would have come from. Do all of the positions for that spread have the same number in the F column?



Reply With Quote
  #338 (permalink)
 ron99 
Cleveland, OH
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: QST
Broker: QST, DeCarley Trading, Gain
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 3,081 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 980
Thanks Received: 5,785

I have found that if I don't clear the tracker sheet before rerunning something on Tracker I sometimes get numbers that are incorrect. I don't know the pattern yet of when it is OK and when it is not.

Or maybe it was when I didn't clear the HistData sheet.

I do remember it was after rerunning spreads with slight changes.

Sorry I should have kept track of what happened when I saw problems.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #339 (permalink)
uuu1965
Riga Latvia
 
Posts: 107 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 441
Thanks Received: 72


Dudetooth View Post
I'm not sure what happened for you ... I just ran those positions for those days and am not sure where $1978.9 would have come from. Do all of the positions for that spread have the same number in the F column?



O, sorry, there was something wrong with my computer (after restart all is OK).
But anyway I`m suprised about IM decrease for calendar ratio spread ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1)/ESV5 P1740(+1). For calendar ratio spread I always use the same IM as for calendar spread (in this case ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1)).

Reply With Quote
  #340 (permalink)
 ron99 
Cleveland, OH
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: QST
Broker: QST, DeCarley Trading, Gain
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 3,081 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 980
Thanks Received: 5,785



uuu1965 View Post
O, sorry, there was something wrong with my computer (after restart all is OK).
But anyway I`m suprised about IM decrease for calendar ratio spread ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1)/ESV5 P1740(+1). For calendar ratio spread I always use the same IM as for calendar spread (in this case ESX5 P1990 (-1)/ESV5 P1890 (+1)).

The 1740 long decreases the possible loss below 1740. So a lower IM because of reduced possible loss.

Started this thread Reply With Quote




Last Updated on September 23, 2021


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts