NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Selling Options on Futures?


Discussion in Options

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one ron99 with 2,221 posts (4,489 thanks)
    2. looks_two SMCJB with 346 posts (733 thanks)
    3. looks_3 kevinkdog with 341 posts (400 thanks)
    4. looks_4 myrrdin with 288 posts (408 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one SMCJB with 2.1 thanks per post
    2. looks_two ron99 with 2 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 myrrdin with 1.4 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 kevinkdog with 1.2 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 1,950,287 views
    2. thumb_up 9,259 thanks given
    3. group 458 followers
    1. forum 7,370 posts
    2. attach_file 794 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Selling Options on Futures?

  #4191 (permalink)
 
SMCJB's Avatar
 SMCJB 
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT and Stellar
Broker: Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,041 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,375
Thanks Received: 10,192


CobblersAwls View Post
From my understanding, If I wanted to Sell a Call with a strike price at 4,100.00, I would place a Sell Limit at the Ask at 13.50.

Maybe this is obvious, maybe if your very new it's not, but 13.50 is where other people are also trying to sell. The best buyers are only willing to pay 12.90. So unless the market or vol moves your unlikely to get filled at 13.50

CobblersAwls View Post
The current price is 3575 for Sept15 Futs.
4100 - 3575 = 525

You are selling a call that is 525 points or almost 15% out of the money.

CobblersAwls View Post
525 / 13.5 =€38.88

Premium as a percentage of distance out of the money? Not sure I understand the relevance.

CobblersAwls View Post
This seems a little low to me. Where am I going wrong? What's the correct way to calculate the premium based on the above info?

Option pricing is an extremely complicated subject that is debated by some of the greatest financial minds in the world.
The first and easiest model was the Black Scholes model, which for anybody other than the most sophisticated traders will be sufficient (especially when you adjust your volatility skew).

A google of Black Scholes will give you an enormous list of potential references. Wikipedia has a good and precise page developed to it. While at first the formula may look daunting, it's actually very easy to build into excel.
The Black–Scholes /ˌblæk ˈʃoʊlz/[1] or Black–Scholes–Merton model is a mathematical model of a financial market containing certain derivative investment instruments. From the model, one can deduce the Black–Scholes formula, which gives a theoretical estimate of the price of European-style options. The formula led to a boom in options trading and legitimised scientifically the activities of the Chicago Board Options Exchange and other options markets around the world.[2] lt is widely used, although often with adjustments and corrections, by options market participants.[3]:751 Many empirical tests have shown that the Black–Scholes price is "fairly close" to the observed prices, although there are well-known discrepancies such as the "option smile".[3]:770–771

The Black–Scholes model was first published by Fischer Black and Myron Scholes in their 1973 paper, "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities", published in the Journal of Political Economy. They derived a partial differential equation, now called the Black–Scholes equation, which estimates the price of the option over time.
Lots Lots more....

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Ninja Mobile Trader VPS (ninjamobiletrader.com)
Trading Reviews and Vendors
Are there any eval firms that allow you to sink to your …
Traders Hideout
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Build trailing stop for micro index(s)
Psychology and Money Management
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
59 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
37 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
24 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
22 thanks
The Program
19 thanks
  #4192 (permalink)
Hills
Barcelona
 
Posts: 14 since Mar 2015
Thanks Given: 7
Thanks Received: 7

Ron, I have been using this strategy for some months. The only problem using the excellent PC-SPAN spreadsheet is that you can't find all the ES contracts (EOM for instance). But this is not a problem for me. I try to use the contract closer to 100 DTE as possible.

I am trying to use this strategy in CL as well. Do you think delta 0.03 in CL is ok? or it could be better to take 0.02?

On the other hand I would like to give my 2 cents in this threat:

I agree with Ron that it doesn't matter when you sell your ES contracts as it is very easy to earn your premium in about 20-25 days. But if you are able to sell them in a bottom it can fast your trade at least 7-12 days. I know Ron doesn't use technical analysis, but if you can find a strategy that give you 15-20 set ups a year (longs) in order to enter a trade in the proper day it can improve your ROI very much.

thank you

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4193 (permalink)
 myrrdin 
Linz Austria
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Commodities
Posts: 1,938 since Nov 2014
Thanks Given: 3,686
Thanks Received: 2,651



Hills View Post

On the other hand I would like to give my 2 cents in this threat:

I agree with Ron that it doesn't matter when you sell your ES contracts as it is very easy to earn your premium in about 20-25 days. But if you are able to sell them in a bottom it can fast your trade at least 7-12 days. I know Ron doesn't use technical analysis, but if you can find a strategy that give you 15-20 set ups a year (longs) in order to enter a trade in the proper day it can improve your ROI very much.

thank you

I also thought about entering at a low when I began trading this system. There are two problems:

1. While you are waiting for the optimum point to enter you do not receive time value. In average, the advantage of entering at the optimum point does not outweigh the advantage of being invested permanently.

2. If I knew a strategy that gives me perfect and reliable entry points for a long trade, I would trade it using outright futures. But I do not have such strategy. The concept of selling OTM options has the advantage that it is not necessary to find this optimum entry point.

Best regards, Myrrdin

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4194 (permalink)
cnncurt
Phoenix, AZ/USA
 
Posts: 8 since Oct 2013
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 10

Ron, is your exit strategy the one you posted on page 303?

Reply With Quote
  #4195 (permalink)
 ron99 
Cleveland, OH
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: QST
Broker: QST, DeCarley Trading, Gain
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 3,081 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 980
Thanks Received: 5,785


Hills View Post
Ron, I have been using this strategy for some months. The only problem using the excellent PC-SPAN spreadsheet is that you can't find all the ES contracts (EOM for instance). But this is not a problem for me. I try to use the contract closer to 100 DTE as possible.

I am trying to use this strategy in CL as well. Do you think delta 0.03 in CL is ok? or it could be better to take 0.02?

On the other hand I would like to give my 2 cents in this threat:

I agree with Ron that it doesn't matter when you sell your ES contracts as it is very easy to earn your premium in about 20-25 days. But if you are able to sell them in a bottom it can fast your trade at least 7-12 days. I know Ron doesn't use technical analysis, but if you can find a strategy that give you 15-20 set ups a year (longs) in order to enter a trade in the proper day it can improve your ROI very much.

thank you

For CL there is a problem that is not a problem in ES. A movement is ES that would force you out of your positions has only happened once since 2008. A movement in CL that would force you out of your position happens every year. Sometimes multiple times a year.

Here's a back of the napkin quick way to look at it. The Sep CL 41.50 put is 93 DTE and 0.0299 delta. The IM is 334 and premium is 0.17.

A Sep 49 put is 977 IM and 0.62 premium.

The 49 put is $450 more in premium and $643 more in IM than the 41.50 put. That totals $1,093. If you take the IM for the 41.50 put (334) times 3 to get the margin and excess we are using to cover a position, you get 1002.

1002 is less than the 1093 for the 49 put. So assuming IV remains the same (normally it increases with a big move) your 41.50 put would be forced out by a 7.50 move down in CL. Moves of that amount or greater happen often.

Applying the same quick look, a Aug ES 1660 put is 98 DTE and 0.0300 delta. Premium is 3.55 or $177.50. IM is 598. Three times 598 is $1,794.

A Aug ES 1900 put is priced at 14.90 or $745. IM is 1840.

The 1900 put is $567.50 more in premium dollars and $1,242 more in IM than the 1660 put. It totals $1809.50.

The $1,809.50 for the 1900 put is more than the $1,794 for the 1660 put. The difference between 1900 and 1660 strikes is 240.

There has never been a movement in 30 days since 2008 greater than 231.25.

So yes you can use the exit at 50% premium drop for any commodity and increase your ROI. But any commodity other than ES (that I have looked at) will not offer the safety of ES.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #4196 (permalink)
 ron99 
Cleveland, OH
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: QST
Broker: QST, DeCarley Trading, Gain
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 3,081 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 980
Thanks Received: 5,785


cnncurt View Post
Ron, is your exit strategy the one you posted on page 303?

Yes. It is also in post #2 Quick Summary on the first page.

When your (CURRENT IM + (CURRENT PREMIUM$ - OPENING PREMIUM$)) > (3 * OPENING IM), you exit your trade

I find that when you hit this exit point, you will lose about 25% of the account if it is full of this position. But waiting for this point keeps you from exiting too early and miss keeping on a profitable position.

Hopefully you have picked your positions well and rarely hit this exit point.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #4197 (permalink)
 ron99 
Cleveland, OH
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: QST
Broker: QST, DeCarley Trading, Gain
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 3,081 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 980
Thanks Received: 5,785


myrrdin View Post
I also thought about entering at a low when I began trading this system. There are two problems:

1. While you are waiting for the optimum point to enter you do not receive time value. In average, the advantage of entering at the optimum point does not outweigh the advantage of being invested permanently.

2. If I knew a strategy that gives me perfect and reliable entry points for a long trade, I would trade it using outright futures. But I do not have such strategy. The concept of selling OTM options has the advantage that it is not necessary to find this optimum entry point.

Best regards, Myrrdin

I have found the same thing. The premium decay missed waiting for the best entry point probably is more than the extra gained by getting a better entry point.

Your ROI for the year will be better with better entry points. But your total profit in dollars at the end of the year will probably be less.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #4198 (permalink)
 myrrdin 
Linz Austria
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Commodities
Posts: 1,938 since Nov 2014
Thanks Given: 3,686
Thanks Received: 2,651


ron99 View Post
For CL there is a problem that is not a problem in ES. A movement is ES that would force you out of your positions has only happened once since 2008. A movement in CL that would force you out of your position happens every year. Sometimes multiple times a year.

Yes, this is also my experience after selling options on many commodities for years. I permanently hold short options in 8 - 15 different commodities (currently 11). And there is only one that I sell without regarding charts or fundamentals: ES.

In my opinion, the reason is the following: Prices for corn, crude oil or coffee are dependent on a limited number of factors (eg. supply & demand, weather, seasonals, COT data), many of which only change longterm. Whereas the indices are dependent on a myriad of parameters, which can change from one minute to the other. Thus, it is possible with quite a good probability to foresee where the prices for corn, crude oil or coffee will not go. This is the basis for selling options. The only thing you can foresee for the indices is that in the very long run they move upwards. But I do not know any model - based on charts or fundamentals - being able to foresee the price of the ES for the next one, two or three weeks. Thus, there are many people around the world buying options to protect their stock portfolio, keeping prices for puts high.

Best regards, Myrrdin

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4199 (permalink)
 volemont 
Zurich, Switzerland
 
Trading: Futures
Posts: 55 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 105
Thanks Received: 75

Ron,

I read the whole thread over last 2-3 weeks. Thanks for sharing the vast amount of knowledge.

The summary on the first page says:
- 2/3 of account in cash for increased margin requirements / ride out positions if move towards strike over time
- Consider adding to positions as OTM options get closer to expiry and margin drops (subject to having 67% of account in cash)

I'm still confused about the cash excess on the account level. I interpret to keep 2/3 of the account in cash in three different ways, i.e, 2/3 cash is:
1) (2 * the opening IM of all open positions) / (account equity)
2) (2 * the current IM of all open positions) / (account equity)
3) (2 * the nominal value of all open positions) / (account equity)

What is the correct interpretation? Thanks

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4200 (permalink)
 ron99 
Cleveland, OH
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: QST
Broker: QST, DeCarley Trading, Gain
Trading: Options on Futures
Posts: 3,081 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 980
Thanks Received: 5,785



volemont View Post
Ron,

I read the whole thread over last 2-3 weeks. Thanks for sharing the vast amount of knowledge.

The summary on the first page says:
- 2/3 of account in cash for increased margin requirements / ride out positions if move towards strike over time
- Consider adding to positions as OTM options get closer to expiry and margin drops (subject to having 67% of account in cash)

I'm still confused about the cash excess on the account level. I interpret to keep 2/3 of the account in cash in three different ways, i.e, 2/3 cash is:
1) (2 * the opening IM of all open positions) / (account equity)
2) (2 * the current IM of all open positions) / (account equity)
3) (2 * the nominal value of all open positions) / (account equity)

What is the correct interpretation? Thanks

I just went through and updated the Quick Summary. Fixed links and changed or dropped some wording.

I dropped the line thats says, "Consider adding to positions as OTM options get closer to expiry". I no longer believe that. I now say keep the IM and excess from day one for the entire time you hold the position. It is just safer that way. (Unless you are riding to expiration and the option is far OTM at about 7 or less DTE. Then I would use some of that cash excess to acquire new position without waiting for the option to expire)

What is 2/3 cash? If you have $15,000 account and you want to add positions that require $500 IM then you can add 10 positions.

$500 IM (1/3 for IM) plus $1,000 cash excess (2/3 for cash excess) equals $1,500 per contract. $15,000 acct balance divided by $1,500 per contract equals 10 contracts. Keep this $1,500 per contract the entire time you hold the position.

Started this thread Reply With Quote




Last Updated on July 28, 2023


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts