Your flash crash model is built on a sample size of 1. Further, there was no actual underlying news event in that scenario. Surely, the vix would behave very differently if markets sold off 8.2% on fear of WWIII.
Incidentally, I wasn't trying to model anything. The best we can do is layout a number of scenarios and see how our positions might perform. Using historical data on market crashes (which by their nature are very rare events) is largely folly. Each crisis is unique and gaining a sense of comfort based on the handful of market shocks we've seen is ill advised in my opinion.
No, actually they wouldn't sell off any differently. If markets sold off 8.2% (your words not mine) IV would behave exactly the same (go up by approximately 8-10% assuming today's IV as background). Just because you do not understand the volatility curve and smile does not mean it is convoluted or ineffable. It just means you don't understand how it functions. If you would like to know more about how it functions I can point you to some resources.
The problem is you are laying out hypothetical scenarios the way that primitive man must have imagined how the world was flat. Your inputs are fallacious and therefore so is the output. You are blindly punching numbers into the Black & Scholes model without even understanding the model - let alone it's inherent limitations.
I agree that each crisis is unique in some regards. And yet history's largest crashes repeat themselves in ways that would startle you should you take the time to study them. Obviously, the future will never be a perfect analog of the past. Stating that we can learn nothing from the past dooms us to repeat it.
If you believe what you've stated there is no evidence that would allow you to trade at all. The risks of wipe out are unknowable and therefore no edge can be derived. Many efficient market theorists believe this to be the case. However, I think you'll find few here who agree with that view point.
The following 3 users say Thank You to eudamonia for this post:
Blind confidence in your time series modeling. That's never gotten anyone into trouble in finance before. Look, I've modeled vol surfaces for a long time. Of course, there's value in historical data - I never said there wasn't. However, you are sticking your head in the sand without any common sense risk overlays. You speak with the bravado of a young kid and I hope you make a killing, but you may want to reinforce your risk management with some things that aren't in the data. Many, many derivs blow ups would have been prevented this way.
I'll make this my last post as I can tell I'm an irritant. Good luck to everyone.
Someone asked a similar question in the main SP500 thread aimed at me, so I just wanted to quickly share my 2 cents. I hedge against a Black Swan by very simply not having all my assets in my brokerage account. Simple as that. What is in my brokerage account is there in order to facilitate trade.
If it goes away, then that would be bad, but certainly not devastating in any sense of the word.
For those that are overly worried about Black Swan events, I would suggest you are way too leveraged.
Due to time constraints, please do not PM me if your question can be resolved or answered on the forum.
Need help? 1) Stop changing things. No new indicators, charts, or methods. Be consistent with what is in front of you first. 2) Start a journal and post to it daily with the trades you made to show your strengths and weaknesses. 3) Set goals for yourself to reach daily. Make them about how you trade, not how much money you make. 4) Accept responsibility for your actions. Stop looking elsewhere to explain away poor performance. 5) Where to start as a trader? Watch this webinar and read this thread for hundreds of questions and answers. 6) Help using the forum? Watch this video to learn general tips on using the site.
If you want to support our community, become an Elite Member.
The following 7 users say Thank You to Big Mike for this post:
I can only deal with the facts and models we have - as imperfect and incomplete as they may be. Although I might sound young and brash I'm not - and I agree that many fools have relied too heavily on their past data. But what would you have me rely upon then - conjecture?
Study the history that I provided in earlier links. Know what has happened so you at least have a reference point.
Perfectly stated. Deleverage and I would add diversify (your strategies and your markets).
Hey guys. I am a new trader and have employed Ron's strategy a month back. Not sure if you guys were referring to me and my 20k account but let me chip in.
For me since we have a rule in place for exiting the trade: Current IM + (Current P - Opening P) > 3 IM, I feel that we are well aware of the risks this strategy involves. Ron has also shown that draw downs are possible, and this is merely a numbers game (with the deltas and pITM).
True enough, one may wish to sell nearer OTM (say 10-20% OTM puts), collect a higher credit, and have a lower win trade. This trade would be ready for a choppy ride and does not mind swings in terms of realised profits/losses.
Ron trades in a safe way in that his returns are more consistent since he goes far far OTM. This way his equity curve might be more gentle as compared to a trader who goes nearer OTM.
Who is to say what's right and what's wrong. Know your risks, plan your trade, and trade your plan.
I sold some puts a week ago in clips, and they're down money as of writing (albeit unrealised). For me, I am not worried about it going ITM since I am so far away.
Please register on futures.io to view futures trading content such as post attachment(s), image(s), and screenshot(s).
Of course, I am still new and hope that we can learn from one another.
ES futures options, 60 day constant volatility. ATM, 5 (.05) delta and 1 (.01) delta.
Not a perfect comparison to what's being discussed above, but gives an idea of what may happen to a 90-day 3-delta option which was sold a month ago, and now it's a a 60-day 1-delta option. The IV can soar. Unfortunately, this only goes back to mid June 2009.
If your software set up doesn't include VAR or stress test calculations, a simple option calculator will suffice to manually stress test an individual option under different underlying, IV and DTE scenarios.
Last edited by CafeGrande; July 3rd, 2015 at 12:01 AM.