NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Selling Options on Futures?


Discussion in Options

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one ron99 with 2,221 posts (4,489 thanks)
    2. looks_two SMCJB with 346 posts (733 thanks)
    3. looks_3 kevinkdog with 341 posts (400 thanks)
    4. looks_4 myrrdin with 288 posts (408 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one SMCJB with 2.1 thanks per post
    2. looks_two ron99 with 2 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 myrrdin with 1.4 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 kevinkdog with 1.2 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 1,999,290 views
    2. thumb_up 9,259 thanks given
    3. group 458 followers
    1. forum 7,370 posts
    2. attach_file 794 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Selling Options on Futures?

  #3681 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,666 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,892
Thanks Received: 7,360


daydayup8 View Post
I know he has DeCarley, does that mean some brokerages have advantages over other brokers?

They have different rules they adhere to, but that doesn't mean it is an advantage for one broker or not.

You can always call in the order to OX, and I think they allow you to trade 0 interest then.

Question for you: why not just find a comparable option that has open interest, and then trade that?

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
Cheap historycal L1 data for stocks
Stocks and ETFs
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Trend Direction Force Index (TDFI)
Platforms and Indicators
 
  #3682 (permalink)
 daydayup8 
tennessee/USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Quotetracker, TOS
Broker: OX TOS
Trading: ES
Posts: 83 since Aug 2014
Thanks Given: 267
Thanks Received: 8


kevinkdog View Post
They have different rules they adhere to, but that doesn't mean it is an advantage for one broker or not.

You can always call in the order to OX, and I think they allow you to trade 0 interest then.

Question for you: why not just find a comparable option that has open interest, and then trade that?

CLF5 65P, bid 0.02, ask 0.04, 70P bid 0.04, ask 0.08.
Right now, CLF5 is about 91.7, I want to 24, 25 OTM of the price to be safe, so, 70P feels a little risky, 65P feels too little meat.
I have watched CL for quite some time, I got my first trade yesterday at 0.01 CLZ4 65P (most of you don't even consider or maybe take profit at that price:-). I am trying to get the second trade. I always feel CL or NG risky, so I want to be as much as OTM possible.

Reply With Quote
  #3683 (permalink)
dbh21
San Diego, CA
 
Posts: 23 since Nov 2012
Thanks Given: 14
Thanks Received: 1



dbh21 View Post
That helps. My understanding of SPAN is it tests 16 different combinations of price and vol movement to come up with the value. In that case while it is not the max of one side, it is not the sum either.

But I am still confused by TOS. They appear to do the SPAN calculations for the strangle:

So this says the Min risk is 660, and the Buying Power effect 780. Given these are no where near 229 and 400, it looks like they are adding them. I'm going to have to ask them to clarify. Just want to make sure I am not asking dumb questions.

I finally heard back from TOS (customer support is very lacking). Apparently they have a SOM (Short Option Minimum) of 330 per option. I think this is far in excess of the SPAN minimum, and it ends up overriding the SPAN calculation. The net effect is there is no benefit to trading FOTM strangles at TOS from what I can tell. Bah

Reply With Quote
  #3684 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,666 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,892
Thanks Received: 7,360


daydayup8 View Post
CLF5 65P, bid 0.02, ask 0.04, 70P bid 0.04, ask 0.08.
Right now, CLF5 is about 91.7, I want to 24, 25 OTM of the price to be safe, so, 70P feels a little risky, 65P feels too little meat.
I have watched CL for quite some time, I got my first trade yesterday at 0.01 CLZ4 65P (most of you don't even consider or maybe take profit at that price:-). I am trying to get the second trade. I always feel CL or NG risky, so I want to be as much as OTM possible.

What is your net profit going to be on those CLZ4 65P? $5? Is that really worth the unlimited risk involved? Your ROI may be over 2%, but you'd have to sell a bunch (20!!!) to make $100. 20 contracts gets unwieldy really fast if prices go against you...

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #3685 (permalink)
 daydayup8 
tennessee/USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Quotetracker, TOS
Broker: OX TOS
Trading: ES
Posts: 83 since Aug 2014
Thanks Given: 267
Thanks Received: 8


kevinkdog View Post
What is your net profit going to be on those CLZ4 65P? $5? Is that really worth the unlimited risk involved? Your ROI may be over 2%, but you'd have to sell a bunch (20!!!) to make $100. 20 contracts gets unwieldy really fast if prices go against you...



I sold 4 @0.01, IM total 145.2, excess 290.4, delta 0.00, DTE 55, ROI about 5% (still getting free trades in OX). You are right, I will be more cautious, just could not find the right strike. I am still in the testing mode. What CL position you have now if you don't mind?

Reply With Quote
  #3686 (permalink)
 daydayup8 
tennessee/USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Quotetracker, TOS
Broker: OX TOS
Trading: ES
Posts: 83 since Aug 2014
Thanks Given: 267
Thanks Received: 8

Just look at CLF5 70P, it had price 0.12 yesterday, 0.07 today, I wish I had sold that strike with the same timing I sold the CLZ465p.
just couldn't do that as I think 70P is too risky.

Reply With Quote
  #3687 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,666 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,892
Thanks Received: 7,360


daydayup8 View Post
I sold 4 @0.01, IM total 145.2, excess 290.4, delta 0.00, DTE 55, ROI about 5% (still getting free trades in OX). You are right, I will be more cautious, just could not find the right strike. I am still in the testing mode. What CL position you have now if you don't mind?

I have some Dec 72 and 74, and some Nov 80s. I put most of those on a while ago, though.

Kevin

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #3688 (permalink)
CafeGrande
St Paul, MN, USA
 
Posts: 200 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 131
Thanks Received: 207

The implied volatility has been on a steady march higher and it's accelerated recently. Pretty dramatic, even in the forward months (March shown). Seems odd ... shoulder season, fairly tight trading range for the last two months, building stocks back up at a healthy clip, no hurricanes and so on. Last year the same time period saw IV flat as a board until right after Thanksgiving. Any ideas? I know the storage report is in the a.m. but IV has moved higher right through those for the last couple of weeks.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	gas natural.PNG
Views:	127
Size:	60.5 KB
ID:	158199  
Reply With Quote
  #3689 (permalink)
MGBRoadster
Lancashire UK
 
Posts: 52 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 42
Thanks Received: 32


dbh21 View Post
Thanks Chris.

I've been using Dudetooth's excel sheet. Frankly its the finest VB programming I've seen (VB is very icky).

I'm still reading, but I read 15-20 points for CL on the puts. Also, he'd never touch anything > 75 or less than 120.



I get this concept, but how far out are you talking? The 70Puts 55 days out are 0.03, and the 70 Puts 84 days out are 0.08. So assuming the market is relatively stable, there should be roughly 0.05 of profit within ~30 days of selling the puts 84 days out. Does that sound correct?

Yes that sounds about right. I've had good trades with entries around 0.07/0.08 and exiting at 0.02/0.03.

I've read somewhere one rule of thumb is to exit when 2/3rds of the premium has been gained.

Ron discusses this topic with regards ES from post # 3130


Chris

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #3690 (permalink)
 
SMCJB's Avatar
 SMCJB 
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT and Stellar
Broker: Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,049 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,388
Thanks Received: 10,207



CafeGrande View Post
The implied volatility has been on a steady march higher and it's accelerated recently. Pretty dramatic, even in the forward months (March shown). Seems odd ... shoulder season, fairly tight trading range for the last two months, building stocks back up at a healthy clip, no hurricanes and so on. Last year the same time period saw IV flat as a board until right after Thanksgiving. Any ideas? I know the storage report is in the a.m. but IV has moved higher right through those for the last couple of weeks.

Summer is over, Winter approaches, time to start banging the drums of fear...

More seriously it is true we have been "building stocks back up at a healthy clip" in fact I believe we have injected more gas this injection season than any other on record. The fact still remains though that stocks are currently 11% below last years stock level and 12% below the 5 year average. ICE's end of season storage futures are currently 3515/3540 which would imply that at the end of the injection season we will still be 8% below last years stock levels. If we go into winter 8% below last year, and then get another winter the same as last year ....

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report - EIA

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on July 28, 2023


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts