Thomas Piketty Capital in the Twenty-First Century - futures io
futures io futures trading

Thomas Piketty Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Discussion in Off-Topic

      Top Posters
    1. looks_one ratfink with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 puma with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Quick Summary with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    1. trending_up 1,047 views
    2. thumb_up 1 thanks given
    3. group 0 followers
    1. forum 4 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments

Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

Search this Thread

Thomas Piketty Capital in the Twenty-First Century

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Swing Trader
Data Scientist & DevOps
Manta, Ecuador
Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Trading: Emini Futures
Big Mike's Avatar
Posts: 49,753 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 32,299 given, 97,506 received

Capital in the Twenty-First Century: Thomas Piketty, Arthur Goldhammer: 9780674430006: Books

Who here has read this book?


We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote

Journal Challenge February 2021 results (so far):
Competing for $1500 in prizes from Topstep
looks_oneSBtrader82 's Trading Journalby SBtrader82
(170 thanks from 31 posts)
looks_twoJust BEING a Trader: Letting Go!!by iqgod
(116 thanks from 33 posts)
looks_3Wisdom is Emptinessby Mtype
(68 thanks from 25 posts)
looks_4Deetee’s DAX Trading Journal (time based)by Deetee
(31 thanks from 17 posts)
looks_5Journal for peanuts1956by peanuts1956
(23 thanks from 13 posts)
(login for full post details)
  #3 (permalink)
Birmingham UK
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: TST/Rithmic
Trading: YM/Gold
ratfink's Avatar
Posts: 3,651 since Dec 2012
Thanks: 17,422 given, 8,403 received

Big Mike View Post
Who here has read this book?

Haven't read that one, but I can recommend this one:

The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else: Hernando De Soto: 9780465016150: Books

Would be interested to know more about the Piketty book.

Travel Well
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #4 (permalink)
Birmingham UK
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: TST/Rithmic
Trading: YM/Gold
ratfink's Avatar
Posts: 3,651 since Dec 2012
Thanks: 17,422 given, 8,403 received


The Problem with Piketty

Charles Gave

Thomas Sowell coined a marvelous phrase to describe the well-intentioned social engineers who always know what needs to be done to improve the wellbeing of the downtrodden. He called them “the anointed” and explained how their reasoning always evolves in the same three stages:

1.) They identify a problem, which may or may not exist. But whether it is real or not, they always insist the problem is caused by market failures.

2.) They propose a solution, which inevitably involves a greater role for the State—and for themselves as its high priests (high priests do not work, except within the Temple).

3.) When their solution fails (as it invariably does), they don’t re-examine their thinking, but just complain that it has been implemented with insufficient vigor. Needless to say, they put forward a new and improved plan they insist will work better next time...

Thomas Piketty is one of France’s great (self-)anointed. Like the rest of his cohort, he eagerly supported François Hollande in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election. Once voted in, the great man started to follow Piketty’s advice, and massively raised taxes on capital. Naturally the policy failed miserably, so Piketty has published a book which explains—predictably—that his recommendations only failed because they were not applied on a worldwide basis. Apparently this book has now become a best seller.

The extraordinary thing is that Piketty’s analysis is based on a massive logical error. His thesis runs as follows: if R is the rate of return on invested capital and if G is the growth rate of the economy, since R>G, profits will grow faster than GDP, and the rich will get richer and the poor poorer. This is GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) at its most egregious. Piketty confuses the return on invested capital, or ROIC, with the growth rate of corporate profits, a mistake so basic it is scarcely believable.

Let me explain with an example. I happen to be a shareholder in an industrial bakery in the south west of France. It has a return on invested capital of 20%, but we cannot reinvest the profits in the company at 20%. If we were to reinvest the profits by putting more capital to work, the profits would not change at all, because nobody in the region is going to buy more bread and productivity gains there are non-existent. In other words, the marginal return of one more unit of capital put to work is zero. So instead of reinvesting in the bakery, we distribute the profits among the shareholders and they invest them elsewhere as they see fit. In short, our bakery has a high ROIC but no profit growth.

At the other extreme, a company expanding rapidly according to a “stack ’em high, sell ’em cheap” model might well show a low ROIC but very fast profit growth. Every company in the world can be “mapped” according to these two criteria: ROIC, and the growth rate of corporate profits.

Over the long term, the growth rate of corporate profits cannot be higher than the growth rate of GDP. That’s simply because if it was, after a while corporate profits would rise to reach 100% of GDP, which we all know is silly. Historically, the ratio of domestic profit to GDP has been a mean-reverting variable.

In reality, all Piketty has done is to rehash the great Marxist theory about the “unavoidable impoverishment” of the working classes, recasting it as a theory in which the capitalist class gets richer and richer over time, and everyone else poorer and poorer. We only need to look at the history of the last 150 years, or of the last 20—in which two billion people have escaped poverty—to see how valid this theory has proved to be.

Still, it was fine for Marx to confuse the ROIC and the growth rate of corporate profits, because he worked in the days before William Jevons, Eugen Böhm-Bawerk, Knut Wicksell, Joseph Schumpeter and Alfred Marshall, who between them developed the notion of the marginal return on one more unit of capital. Alas, one cannot make the same excuse for Piketty, who is writing more than 100 years after this discovery.

The next question, then, is: why has his book become a best seller? The answer was provided a long time ago by the early 20th Century Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, who argued that to the governing and chattering classes a theory can be:

1.) true and useful
2.) false and useful
3.) true and useless
4.) false and useless

Here a “useful” theory is one that increases the power of the anointed, not one that benefits the population at large. Theories that fall into the “false and useful” category are grasped especially fiercely by the anointed precisely because they help them to consolidate their political power. Keynesianism is a prime example.

Which brings us to Schumpeter. In Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy he made a fabulous remark which throws more light on the matter. He explained that the rise in living standards allowed by capitalism through the process of creative destruction was going to drive a huge rise in the educational level of the population. The educated but uncompetitive would grow to hate the capitalist system, under which their merits were not recognized, and would try to seize control of educational and cultural institutions in order to teach the youth that markets do not work.

Much the same idea was expressed by the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci. If these fellows were to take control of the cultural and educational world, then 30 years later the political system would fall into their hands like a ripe fruit. Then they would be able to use the democratic process to destroy the free market, having first brain-washed the electorate.

Don’t get me wrong, I am absolutely in favor of education. But I am against a centralized educational system, easily controlled by the anointed.

This leaves open a question: why do intellectuals hate free markets? Because, as French sociologist Raymond Boudon explained, in a free market they would be paid at their real value.

Their success in controlling not ideas, which are uncontrollable, but the teaching of ideas, continued Schumpeter, would inevitably lead to a shift from a democratic, market-based system, to tyranny and poverty.

This is exactly what is happening in the old world today. An over-educated, self-anointed elite is fighting tooth and nail to defy market forces and preserve its position in the educational and cultural system. Piketty, as one of this elite, is being feted accordingly. Nothing new there.

Still haven't read the book and, as there's nothing in this review that I'd disagree with, I doubt I will.

Travel Well
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #5 (permalink)
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra ahRrrr CQG ...
Trading: Bund, ES, ...
puma's Avatar
Posts: 964 since Aug 2010
Thanks: 7,272 given, 1,499 received

Always,in times of economic distress, this kind of communist loudmouths bubble up to the surface !

People like Piketty, will cause hardship for millions and even death.

I suggest these classics as anti-toxin:

Friedrich Hayek "the fatal conceit"

Milton Friedman "capitalism and freedom"

and since Pikety is such a French douche - here is a great son of France:

Frédéric Bastiat - What Is Seen and What Is Not Seen

France is deep in a Socialist nightmare - and people like Piketty are the cause of it.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to puma for this post:

futures io Trading Community Off-Topic > Thomas Piketty Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Last Updated on May 23, 2014

Upcoming Webinars and Events

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!


Journal Challenge w/$1500 prizes from Topstep!


Battlestations! Show us your trading desk - $1,500 in prizes!


Call Option Buying: The New Pain Trade? w/Carley Garner

Elite only

Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432,
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts