Is the US Debt Ceiling Unconstitutional? - futures io
futures io futures trading



Is the US Debt Ceiling Unconstitutional?


Discussion in Off-Topic

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 3 posts (2 thanks)
    2. looks_two liquidcci with 2 posts (2 thanks)
    3. looks_3 traderwerks with 1 posts (2 thanks)
    4. looks_4 kbit with 1 posts (1 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one traderwerks with 2 thanks per post
    2. looks_two liquidcci with 1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 kbit with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 0.7 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 912 views
    2. thumb_up 7 thanks given
    3. group 1 followers
    1. forum 7 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Is the US Debt Ceiling Unconstitutional?

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Swing Trader
Data Scientist & DevOps
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Trading: Emini Futures
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 49,779 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 32,306 given, 97,566 received


Quoting 
WASHINGTON -- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Wednesday that President Barack Obama should use the 14th Amendment to declare the debt ceiling unconstitutional in the event that Congress hurtles toward another debt showdown.

"I'm a big fan of the Constitution," Pelosi said during a discussion on raising the debt ceiling in a sit-down with reporters. "The credit validity of the United States shall not be in question."

Asked if she expected Obama to use the 14th Amendment as a last resort for avoiding a debt default and other economic consequences, something the president said was not an option during last year's debt stand-off, Pelosi shrugged.

"I don't have any idea. But I think he should. I think he should," she said.

The Democratic leader privately endorsed the concept to members of her caucus during last summer's debate. As Congress inched closer to default, progressive Democrats increasingly called on Obama to use the constitutional option as an 11th-hour solution to averting a crisis. In the end, he never did.

The provision at the heart of the constitutional debate, Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, states: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payments of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” Democrats essentially argued that since the "public debt" cannot be questioned, then the debt ceiling itself is unconstitutional.

Pelosi said Wednesday that lessons were learned from last year's debt ceiling debacle.

"You cannot put the country through the uncertainty. We lifted the debt ceiling, right? We still got the credit rating taken down because of the uncertainty of it all," she said. "You cannot flirt with this. This is really dangerous."

"I would like to see the Constitution used to protect the country's full faith and credit, as the Constitution does."

Before moving on to another topic, the minority leader reined in her comments somewhat and said it is ultimately up to Obama to decide how to proceed in debt ceiling negotiations.

"Again, that's my opinion. I'm in a different branch of government. In the minority, in the House," she said. "What do I know about what the president's going to do?"

Is the US Debt Ceiling Unconstitutional?

Mike

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/
Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote

 
 
(login for full post details)
  #2 (permalink)
Aurora, Il USA
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,902 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,294 given, 3,357 received

Please don't submit anything involving that vapid, insipid airhead pelosi in the future.

I think it is constitutional but wouldn't be surprised if obama claimed that it wasn't....pretty much his modus operandi in so far as not caring about what is in the constitution and in fact considers it a document of negative liberties but I don't want to write a book here.....

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to kbit for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #3 (permalink)
NYC + NY / USA
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: "I trade, therefore, I AM!"; Theme Song: "Atomic Dog!"
Trading: EMD, 6J, ZB
 
kronie's Avatar
 
Posts: 798 since Oct 2009


On Elitetrader.com, what happened with open discussion threads, is they were finally moved into main categories so that traders seeking trading threads could find them, and concentrate upon them,

and not get them confused with political discussion threads, like this one.

perhaps we can have one of the Administrators, move this discussion to the Political category

that way such a discussion that has nothing to do with strategies towards trades or potential trades can receive others seeking political discussions, whether pro or con / against the present or future administration or contenders for the next administration

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #4 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Swing Trader
Data Scientist & DevOps
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Trading: Emini Futures
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 49,779 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 32,306 given, 97,566 received

This thread is already clearly in the off topic section, and you can filter categories you see in your user cp.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/
Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #5 (permalink)
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: NQ, CL
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 
Posts: 865 since Jun 2011
Thanks: 610 given, 1,070 received

I think the framers of the Constitution would have liked to tar and feather Nancy Pelosi in the public square just for saying stupid things. I also think the framers could never imagine taxing it citizens at the levels Pelosi and gang want to fund out of control spending binges for which they want to raise the debt ceiling.

Where has common sense gone.

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to liquidcci for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #6 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Swing Trader
Data Scientist & DevOps
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Trading: Emini Futures
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 49,779 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 32,306 given, 97,566 received


liquidcci View Post
Where has common sense gone.

I don't think its called common sense... but the answer is - to the highest bidder.

Mike

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/
Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Big Mike for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #7 (permalink)
Taipei Taiwan
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP Clearing
Trading: TW
 
Posts: 693 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 434 given, 464 received


kbit View Post
I think it is constitutional but wouldn't be surprised if obama claimed that it wasn't....pretty much his modus operandi in so far as not caring about what is in the constitution and in fact considers it a document of negative liberties but I don't want to write a book here.....

Obama has dismissed this so far, it is more the likes of Tom Harkin and Pelosi.

The debt ceiling is a law passed by congress to control spending authorized by laws congress passed :-) There are two sets of laws in conflict. A set of statutes to pay a certain amount of money and a statute limiting the amount of money you can raise via the Treasury. Anyway, statutes like the debt ceiling law would not be able to supersede the constitution.

What the constitution does say is that the US will pay its debts. I do not think the debt ceiling law could be used to stop payments on current debt. Other spending and new debt I think would be where the fight would be.

I think the POTUS should pay interest on the current debt regardless if the debt ceiling is raised or not and then the president decides what not to pay until Congress gets their act together or it gets settled in the courts which may be a very long time.

Math. A gateway drug to reality.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to traderwerks for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #8 (permalink)
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: NQ, CL
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 
Posts: 865 since Jun 2011
Thanks: 610 given, 1,070 received


Big Mike View Post
I don't think its called common sense... but the answer is - to the highest bidder.

Mike

You got that right.

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Off-Topic > Is the US Debt Ceiling Unconstitutional?


Last Updated on June 21, 2012


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing
 

Battlestations! Show us your trading desk - $1,500 in prizes!

March
 

Importance of Finding Your Own Way w/Adam Grimes

Elite only
 

Journal Challenge w/Jigsaw

April
     



Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts