Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
As I experienced in uncounted shots and was taught to me by an army ranger master sergeant when I was a lad in 1991. He's not a man you would disagree with at 1500m. If he says Coriolis, don't say Eotvos until out of range
love the post but naturally i do have a few questions if i may
If the Coriolis is true why does it not affect the airplanes ?
The Navy has a rail gun > able to hit the target @ 100 miles!!!
They also make no adjustment for the curvature or getting affected by any "Coriolis" ?
They actually say nothing about the two. But will still hit the target @ 100 miles.
Why is that you think ?
Is it possible that the sniper's bullet is being affected by the air density ? As oppose to the "rotation" of earth ?
Since i'm still in search for the scientific proof for the rotation of earth, can you please help me find it ??
The Michaelson Morley experiment failed. The Sagnac experiment failed. The Airy's failure, failing
