Monsanto's GM Foods (Page 8) - Off-Topic | futures.io
futures.io futures trading
 

Go Back   futures.io

> Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Off-Topic


Monsanto's GM Foods
Started:October 5th, 2011 (10:17 AM) by soumi71 Views / Replies:9,081 / 128
Last Reply:January 17th, 2014 (11:37 PM) Attachments:2

Welcome to futures.io.

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.


You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike
     

Reply
 2  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread

Monsanto's GM Foods

Old September 24th, 2012, 09:34 PM   #71 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,847 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,281 given, 3,326 received

Monsanto Launches Damage Control Over GMO/Cancer Study

Biotech giant Monsanto has launched a desperate damage control effort in the aftermath of a French study which found that rats fed on Monsanto’s genetically-engineered corn were far more likely to suffer tumors, organ failure and premature death.

Aside from the details of the study, a wider question remains. If Monsanto and other GMO giants are so confident in the safety of their products and have no qualms about them being in the food supply, why have they spent a combined total of over $19 million dollars in an attempt to prevent Americans from knowing that their food is genetically modified?

Monsanto has bankrolled a huge campaign fronted by lobbyists in an effort to sink California’s Proposition 37, a bill that would simply mandate genetically modified food and ingredients be labeled at the retail level.

If genetically-modified food is safe and the studies have proven it is safe, why is Monsanto so desperate to keep its presence in our food hidden?

The recent study, conducted by scientists at the University of Caen and published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, found that 50 percent of male and 70 percent of female rats fed on a diet containing NK603 – a genetically modified corn produced by Monsanto – or those exposed to Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller – suffered tumors and multiple organ damage, causing them to die prematurely.

Monsanto immediately went into spin mode, issuing a press release over the weekend claiming that toxicologists and public health experts had found “fundamental problems with the study design,” without specifically explaining what those problems were.

Given the fact that Monsanto-funded scientists are routinely wheeled out in public to attack the abundance of evidence confirming the link between GMO and cancer, the reaction to the French study was unsurprising.

As Sayer Ji explains, the two previous studies before the French inquiry, the results of which claimed that there was no link between Monsanto’s Roundup Ready herbicide and cancer, were both funded by Monsanto itself.
A study published in the journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology which exonerated Monsanto contained this glaring admission of a conflict of interest;

“The authors have disclosed the funding source for this research. JSM [study author] has served has a paid consultant to Monsanto Company….This research was supported by the Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri.”
Is it really just a coincidence that the first study in recent years not to be funded by Monsanto produces completely different results?

“There is no plausible mechanism for the results reported with genetically modified maize and the results are inconsistent with an extensive body of experience and scientific study,” Monsanto claimed in response to the French study.
However, the results are only inconsistent with previous (Monsanto-funded) studies because the French study went beyond the 90-day period which Monsanto had previously been able to hide behind in claiming their GMO products were safe.

As The Grocer highlights, the French investigation “Was the first study to look at the long-term effects of Roundup and NK603, which has been approved for human consumption based on 90-day feeding trials. Scientists found that rats developed mammary tumours and severe liver and kidney damages as early as four months in males and seven in females, compared with 23 months and 14 months respectively in a control group.”

Since tumors and other ailments were only discovered after a four month period, this throws into serious doubt previous (Monsanto-funded) studies the biotech giant pointed to as proving the safety of GMO because they failed to extend beyond a 90 day period, whereas the French study looked at the effects of GMO throughout the whole life span of the rats.
This again illustrates the fact that far from being inadequate or badly modeled, the French study was more extensive and more complete than any previous study – with the added bonus that it was not funded by Monsanto – it was completely impartial.

As we reported last week, apologists for Monsanto have jumped on the bandwagon in an effort to discredit the findings of the French study, lying by omission in an attempt to cast doubt on its findings.

David Spiegelhalter of the University of Cambridge tried to question the accuracy of the study by highlighting that “The study’s untreated control arm comprised only 10 rats of each sex, most of which also got tumors.”
However, Spiegelhalter failed to acknowledge that it took these rats anything up to 19 months longer to develop tumors compared to those fed on Monsanto’s GM corn.

Having had its nose bloodied in various European countries and facing being kicked out of the European marketplace altogether, Monsanto is in panic mode right now. California’s Right to Know Act - otherwise known as Prop 37 - could spell the beginning of the end not only for Monsanto’s business model but for the whole GMO agenda across the globe.


Monsanto Launches Damage Control Over GMO/Cancer Study Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Reply With Quote
     

Old September 25th, 2012, 04:01 PM   #72 (permalink)
Membership Revoked
LA, California, USA
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Favorite Futures: CL,ES mainly
 
Victory Trader's Avatar
 
Posts: 531 since Sep 2011
Thanks: 205 given, 373 received

CONTROLLED MEDIA....

Money Trumps Journalism: Monsanto Has Fox News Kill Cancer Milk Story - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndg0S9MFSHM
=====================
Saw this awhile back but thought it was good to post.

Reply With Quote
     

Old September 25th, 2012, 04:03 PM   #73 (permalink)
Membership Revoked
LA, California, USA
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Favorite Futures: CL,ES mainly
 
Victory Trader's Avatar
 
Posts: 531 since Sep 2011
Thanks: 205 given, 373 received

Reuter's - Study finds tumors in rats fed on Monsanto's GM corn


In a study that prompted criticism from other experts, French scientists said on Wednesday that rats fed on Monsanto's genetically modified (GM) corn or exposed to its top-selling weedkiller suffered tumors and multiple organ damage.

Gilles-Eric Seralini of the University of Caen and colleagues said ra]ts fed on a diet containing NK603 - a seed variety made tolerant to dousings of Monsanto's Roundup weedkiller - or given water with Roundup at levels permitted in the United States, died earlier than those on a standard diet.

Experts not involved in the study were highly skeptical about its methods and findings, with some accusing the French scientists of going on a "statistical fishing trip". - Study finds tumors in rats fed on Monsanto's GM corn - Health - Health care | NBC News

==============

The reason I post this....Note the clear bias against the conclusions of the study written into the piece by Reuter's, using quotes by un-named "experts." Monsanto is already working to smear the study so they can defeat California's Prop 37 and force you to eat whatever their laboratories want you to eat (even though Monsanto's own canteen bans GMO foods).

The fact that MSNBC carried the story at all proves that the alternative media is now driving the news cycle; that the corporate-owned media are reacting to us rather than the other way around. But still the propagandists are paid to ridicule and dismiss any criticism of Monsanto's products.

Monsanto's behavior mimics that of the cigarette companies during the 1960s, when profit had the top priority and the health of the customers was not a factor in corporate planning.

Reply With Quote
     
The following 2 users say Thank You to Victory Trader for this post:
     

Old September 25th, 2012, 04:50 PM   #74 (permalink)
Membership Revoked
British Columbia
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NINJA
Broker/Data: ZEN
Favorite Futures: Crude
 
Posts: 1,091 since May 2010
Thanks: 192 given, 481 received

If can avoid most of monsanto's crops. If I must I will move to Europe where common sense prevails. If they touch the salmon, they are declaring war.

I see that Monsanto people are everywhere in the government. We need to wake these people up. It is clear Monsanto lobbying must be outlawed. They are clearly able to buy and sell the government with relative ease. Clearly Obama has failed in this regard. I can only wonder, however, why Monsanto backs the Romney campaign with money and campaign staffers, but not Obama's. Would it be easier for them to do their evil work under Republican rule?

I am spreading the word to everyone I know, trying to get people to understand the danger. People wake up.

Reply With Quote
     
The following user says Thank You to syxforex for this post:
     

Old September 25th, 2012, 04:55 PM   #75 (permalink)
Membership Revoked
British Columbia
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NINJA
Broker/Data: ZEN
Favorite Futures: Crude
 
Posts: 1,091 since May 2010
Thanks: 192 given, 481 received

Futures Edge on FIO
Well said VT, we must take control of the media while the internet is still free....


Victory Trader View Post
In a study that prompted criticism from other experts, French scientists said on Wednesday that rats fed on Monsanto's genetically modified (GM) corn or exposed to its top-selling weedkiller suffered tumors and multiple organ damage.

Gilles-Eric Seralini of the University of Caen and colleagues said ra]ts fed on a diet containing NK603 - a seed variety made tolerant to dousings of Monsanto's Roundup weedkiller - or given water with Roundup at levels permitted in the United States, died earlier than those on a standard diet.

Experts not involved in the study were highly skeptical about its methods and findings, with some accusing the French scientists of going on a "statistical fishing trip". - Study finds tumors in rats fed on Monsanto's GM corn - Health - Health care | NBC News

==============

The reason I post this....Note the clear bias against the conclusions of the study written into the piece by Reuter's, using quotes by un-named "experts." Monsanto is already working to smear the study so they can defeat California's Prop 37 and force you to eat whatever their laboratories want you to eat (even though Monsanto's own canteen bans GMO foods).

The fact that MSNBC carried the story at all proves that the alternative media is now driving the news cycle; that the corporate-owned media are reacting to us rather than the other way around. But still the propagandists are paid to ridicule and dismiss any criticism of Monsanto's products.

Monsanto's behavior mimics that of the cigarette companies during the 1960s, when profit had the top priority and the health of the customers was not a factor in corporate planning.


Reply With Quote
     

Old September 26th, 2012, 07:24 PM   #76 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,847 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,281 given, 3,326 received

Russia halts imports of Monsanto corn over cancer fears

Russian authorities temporary suspended the import and sale of Monsanto’s genetically-modified corn after a French study suggested it may be linked to cancer.

The Russia’s consumer-rights regulator Rospotrebnadzor asked scientists at the country’s Institute of Nutrition to review the study. The watchdog has also contacted to European Commission’s Directorate General for Health & Consumers to explain the EU’s position on GM corn.

The report prepared by France's University of Caen and published last week, claimed that rats fed over a two-year period with Monsanto's genetically modified NK603 corn, developed more tumors and other pathologies than a test group fed with regular corn. The NK603, sold under the Roundup label, is genetically engineered to withstand glyphosate weed killer.
The company criticized the study, saying it “doesn’t meet minimum acceptable standards for this type of scientific research” and the data was incomplete.

Monsanto also said Russia’s ban will have little effect on its business as the country import small volumes of corn from the US. Besides that, the Russian government doesn't permit farmers to plant GM crops. "Russia is a net exporter of grain, so the actual impact of their temporary suspension, if any, is likely to be small," the spokesman said in a statement.

Meanwhile, France announced it will uphold the ban on genetically modified crops in the country. It has asked the national food-security agency Anses to examine the study of Monsanto’s corn. If other countries follow the examples of Russia and France it could be a severe blow to the major US biotech.

In California, activists are fighting to have GM products removed from the food supply. They are also pushing to pass Proposition 37, a law that would legally require genetically modified foods to be labeled as such. Monsanto is opposing the law and it has donated over $4.2 million to lobby against it. Over 2,000 farmers have petitioned the US government to more thoroughly investigate the impacts of the genetically modified corn crop from Monsanto.

Russia halts imports of Monsanto corn over cancer fears — RT

Reply With Quote
     
The following user says Thank You to kbit for this post:
     

Old September 29th, 2012, 10:33 AM   #77 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,847 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,281 given, 3,326 received

Russian scientists to broadcast GMO experiment

After a French study suggested that rats fed on Monsanto GMO corn suffered tumors, Russian researches plan their own, this time public, experiment. The unique reality show with rats is expected to prove or deny GMO’s health-threatening influence.

The Russian scientists, who oppose genetically modified organisms (GMO) in food, expect that their year-long experiment will show whether the controversial cultivation process has effects as dangerous as French revelations claimed on September 19.

Scientists from France's University of Caen made public the results of their classified study, publishing the images of rats with tumors after they were fed a diet of genetically modified (GM) maize produced by American chemical giant Monsanto.
The revelation stirred fear across Europe and in Russia, where authorities temporarily suspended the import and sale of Monsanto’s genetically modified corn.

Russian researches from the National Association for Genetic Safety (NAGS) believe such experiments should be conducted publicly, so that people can see the process with their own eyes, and thus trust, or not, the study.
So they came up with the idea of public experiment. Web cameras, installed in cages with rats, will broadcast all stages of the experiment online. The unique reality show will be available on the Internet 24/7 worldwide.

“This is a unique experiment,” project author Elena Sharoykina told RT. “There hasn’t been anything like it before – open, public research by opponents and supporters of GMO.”

The idea behind the test is to feed several groups of rats with different food. One group will be fed with soybeans and corn with a high content of GMOs, while the other gets the same products, but with low GMO levels. The third will be given food with no GMO whatsoever, and the fourth with standard rat food.

For the sake of the purity of the experiment, employees who feed the rats will not know what kind of food they are giving.
Scientists expect to observe five generations of rats, if the rodents survive.
“It is hard to predict how animals will react,” Sharoykina said.

Such an experiment was initially planned to be held in 2006, but back then researchers failed to find financial support. So, they initiated another study, using hamsters. The scientists oversaw a few generations of the rodents and concluded that by the third generation, some of the animals became infertile.

To make the experiment objective, the group of scientists will also include supporters of GMOs and foreign experts.
The research is to be launched in March 2013, because the scientists still have to work out their methods, form a team and find funding.

The current project may cost up to $1 million. Scientists hope to find commercial sponsors, get grants from the government, or even raise some funds through public financing, for example, through the Internet.
Sharoykina says that if the experiment does prove the destructive influence on animals, it should be the pretext to banning GMOs in Russia.

“But we will have a chance to understand in what direction we should move,” she said. “If this research proves negative influence, and supporters of GMOs accept it, the next step should be a moratorium on products with GMOs in Russia.


Rat reality show: Russian scientists to broadcast GMO experiment — RT

Reply With Quote
     

Old September 30th, 2012, 12:10 AM   #78 (permalink)
Elite Member
Portland Oregon, United States
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: Ninjatrader®
Broker/Data: CQG, Kinetick
Favorite Futures: Gameplay Klownbine® Trading of Globex
 
Zondor's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,276 since Jul 2009
Thanks: 1,227 given, 2,445 received

Prop 37 GMO Labeling Initiative Likely to Pass

Even if it passes it won't do any good. Monsanto has too many friends in high places. They will find a way to work around this. Monsanto is not just any company, it is at the top of the corporate fascist pyramid. What "you" want is irrelevant.



Quoting 
September 27, 2012 — Californians aren’t price sensitive when it comes to genetically modified foods, reveal the latest results of the USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times Poll. Even when presented with information about how much regulation might cost the cash-strapped state, a majority of voters support a November ballot initiative that would require new labeling for food that contains genetically modified ingredients. If approved by voters, the initiative would become the first of its kind in the United States.

Sixty-one percent of Californians favor Proposition 37 and labeling genetically engineered food, while 25 percent of voters are opposed. Forty-seven percent said they support the ballot initiative ‘strongly,’ and 16 percent were ‘strongly’ opposed.

USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times Press Release: Ballot Measure to Require Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods Has Broad Support > USC Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences

Reply With Quote
     

Old September 30th, 2012, 12:37 AM   #79 (permalink)
Elite Member
Portland Oregon, United States
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: Ninjatrader®
Broker/Data: CQG, Kinetick
Favorite Futures: Gameplay Klownbine® Trading of Globex
 
Zondor's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,276 since Jul 2009
Thanks: 1,227 given, 2,445 received

A bit of GMO Entertainment

Monsanto hip hop song


Treble Army - Monsantoe Jam - YouTube

Reply With Quote
     

Old September 30th, 2012, 05:12 PM   #80 (permalink)
Elite Member
Portland Oregon, United States
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: Ninjatrader®
Broker/Data: CQG, Kinetick
Favorite Futures: Gameplay Klownbine® Trading of Globex
 
Zondor's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,276 since Jul 2009
Thanks: 1,227 given, 2,445 received

Children of Men (The Movie) Becoming Reality (sponsored by Monsanto)



Quoting 
"Children of Men" envisages a world one generation from now that has fallen into chaos on the heels of an infertility defect in the population. The world's youngest citizen has just died at 18, and humankind is facing the likelihood of its own extinction.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0206634/plotsummary


Quoting 
The negative effects from glyphosate toxicity vary, but some people have been known to develop breasts, have a variety of birth defects, and have been known to experience carcinogenic effects as well. The people are also becoming sterile over time. Given the rate of consumption, they will likely be completely sterile within a decade.

GMO Technology, Glyphosate Toxicity Leaving Men Sterile | NationofChange

Please register on futures.io to view futures trading content such as post attachment(s), image(s), and screenshot(s).


Roundup Herbicide & GMO Corn Implicated In New Pathogen/Infertility Issues – Audio
http://tampa.cbslocal.com/2012/08/04/roundup-herbicide-blamed-for-corn-crop-demi...o-network-gmos-pathogen/

Jeffrey Smith: Genetically Modified Soy Linked to Sterility, Infant Mortality in Hamsters
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-smith/genetically-modified-soy_b_544575.html

Why Monsanto Always Wins
http://truth-out.org/news/item/9:why-monsanto-always-wins


Last edited by Zondor; September 30th, 2012 at 05:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
The following 2 users say Thank You to Zondor for this post:
     

Reply



futures.io > Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Off-Topic > Monsanto's GM Foods

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)
 

NinjaTrader 8: Features and Enhancements, Tips and Tricks

Dec 6
 

Al Brooks: Stop Losing when a Good Trade goes Bad, Correcting Mistakes

Elite only
 

Trading Technologies: Algo Design Lab hands-on

Dec 13
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM Profit Nearly Doubles on Stronger Global Sales Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 August 4th, 2011 09:40 AM
GM Shares Soar, But Is It Too Late for Investors to Jump In? Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 November 18th, 2010 12:40 PM
Some Average Investors May Be Shut Out of GM's IPO Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 November 12th, 2010 12:00 PM
GM Sales Up 7.1 Percent in October, Better Than Expected Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 November 3rd, 2010 12:10 PM
New GM Chief Akerson Known as a Pragmatic Leader Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 August 13th, 2010 01:20 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 AM.

Copyright © 2016 by futures.io. All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
 
no new posts

Page generated 2016-12-04 in 0.18 seconds with 20 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.158.98.119