NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





The Truth: NinjaTrader


Discussion in NinjaTrader

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Fat Tails with 120 posts (165 thanks)
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 54 posts (93 thanks)
    3. looks_3 MetalTrade with 43 posts (10 thanks)
    4. looks_4 ZTR with 41 posts (25 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one AynRandFan with 34 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 1.7 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Fat Tails with 1.4 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 NinjaTrader with 0.9 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 361,123 views
    2. thumb_up 802 thanks given
    3. group 145 followers
    1. forum 1,059 posts
    2. attach_file 65 attachments




 
Search this Thread

The Truth: NinjaTrader

  #601 (permalink)
 
NinjaTrader's Avatar
 NinjaTrader  NinjaTrader is an official Site Sponsor
Site Sponsor

Web: NinjaTrader
AMA: Ask Me Anything
Webinars: NinjaTrader Webinars
Elite offer: Click here
 
Posts: 1,713 since May 2010
Thanks Given: 203
Thanks Received: 2,686


webart View Post
Well I took a long break from Ninja Trader (stilling paying the multi license fee). I thought I'de given if enough time and installed a fresh version from a couple of days ago.

As with all version Ninja trader I have had back to 6.5, as soon as I threw tick data at it to optimize all of the old problems surfaced,

Slow data loading - throttled at 25kbit, meanwhile I can get 5-6Mbit everywhere else.

Still NT tries to load the data again once the optimization is completed and you click on a chart.

Still database issues, I have done 1 night of back testing and have already needed to do the whole, database repair, close NT, open it, delete the old data and reload it, more than once ! .

NT may be ok for chart trading, but it is next to useless still at backtesting using tick data. You should be able to throw atleast 5 years of tick data at it, but it struggles with 1 and is so so so slow.

Nothing changes.

Actually, NinjaTrader 7 backtesting is much faster than 6.5. Below are several benchmarks we posted on our website some time ago. NinjaTrader does not impose any throttling of data transfer rates. I would imagine that this is a function of your internet line quality? If you are connected to your data provider after an optimization/backtest is complete, you click on a chart and on this chart, the start date is older than the available data in your local cache then yes, NinjaTrader will try to get the data. The logic for this is explained ( Historical & Real-time Data) go to the section “When does NinjaTrader load historical data?”. You can bypass this logic if you ensure that you are disconnected during backtesting. Then when a chart is clicked, it will only load the data available from your local cache which of course is a lot faster than loading from the market data service. I am not sure why you felt the need to reset the data base…but for NinjaTrader 7, resetting the database has absolutely no impact on historical data since historical data is now stored separately in files.

Case 1
Backtesting of our SampleMACrossOver strategy on 50 tick ES series on approximately three months of historical data
Version 6.5 - Peak RAM usage of 1.2 GB, 550 MB retained in memory after backtest completion in about 4 minutes
Version 7 - Peak RAM usage never exceeded 110 MB and backtest completion in about 40 seconds

Case 2
Backtesting of our SampleMACrossOver strategy on 50 tick ES series on approximately 1 year of historical data
Version 6.5 - Failed with out of memory exception
Version 7 - Peak RAM usage of 140 MB with a completion time of less than 3 minutes

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
Increase in trading performance by 75%
The Elite Circle
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
35 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
Bigger Wins or Fewer Losses?
19 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
16 thanks
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
14 thanks
  #602 (permalink)
 
atata's Avatar
 atata 
Calgary, AB
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT, IB, TOS, MC
Broker: IB, Rithmic
Trading: CL, ES, GC, ZS, ZB
Posts: 116 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 90
Thanks Received: 99


NinjaTrader View Post
In short –

- Our licensing agreement with TT states that any trade generated from our application when the static SupeDOM is enabled is liable for the patent fee thus you cannot use the dynamic SuperDOM and bypass the patent fee
- NinjaTrader does not differentiate between a broker’s live or demo system, in some cases we are unable to differentiate. Thus, the patent fees apply. However, we have our own built in simulator that bypasses this fee.
- Of course our goal is to have a happy long term customer base but of course, we can’t please everyone.
- I do understand the nature of your requirement but unfortunately I can’t accommodate you since I am legally bound to a licensing agreement I entered into nearly six years ago.

NinjaTrader my comments below:
"when the static SupeDOM is enabled is liable for the patent fee thus you cannot use the dynamic SuperDOM and bypass the patent fee" - your logic does not make any sense here...
I am coder or at least used to be one, therefore I know you can do anything with code what you want. It is always just a question of time and money, having said that the 2 DOMs shall not be exclusive if the code is smartly written, meaning static DOM being enabled does behave as you expect it such complains when no credit available, in the same time there is no good reason to disable the dynamic DOM.

"our goal is to have a happy long term customer base but of course, we can’t please everyone." - partially agreed however if you read this thread through, your company has pissed off a lots of people who paid a good money for your product.
I am sure everyone who currently decided not to use NT at all or just for certain functions, has started with a lots of ambition, plans and took a while to get on the other side of the fence...

atata

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #603 (permalink)
 MetalTrade 
 
Posts: 1,055 since May 2010


hi

it's not a problem in the coding it's a problem in the deal NT made because of the patent with TT

I think that's what NT is trying to say

Reply With Quote
  #604 (permalink)
 
NinjaTrader's Avatar
 NinjaTrader  NinjaTrader is an official Site Sponsor
Site Sponsor

Web: NinjaTrader
AMA: Ask Me Anything
Webinars: NinjaTrader Webinars
Elite offer: Click here
 
Posts: 1,713 since May 2010
Thanks Given: 203
Thanks Received: 2,686


atata View Post
NinjaTrader my comments below:
"when the static SupeDOM is enabled is liable for the patent fee thus you cannot use the dynamic SuperDOM and bypass the patent fee" - your logic does not make any sense here...
I am coder or at least used to be one, therefore I know you can do anything with code what you want. It is always just a question of time and money, having said that the 2 DOMs shall not be exclusive if the code is smartly written, meaning static DOM being enabled does behave as you expect it such complains when no credit available, in the same time there is no good reason to disable the dynamic DOM.

You misunderstand what I am saying.

NinjaTrader entered into a licensing agreement with Trading Technologies. As part of their standard licensing terms, I have to charge 0.10 per side for any futures trade executed through any part of the NinjaTrader application when the static SuperDOM is enabled independent if it is used or not.

This is not a "coding" issue but a "licensing requirement".

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #605 (permalink)
 
casey44's Avatar
 casey44 
Louisville KY
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NT8
Trading: micros
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 247 since Jan 2010
Thanks Given: 4,049
Thanks Received: 311

NT Support, would just like to say thanks for taking the time to give attention to this thead. Obviously you won't hear so much from those who've only had a good experience with NT.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #606 (permalink)
 webart 
Australia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Posts: 106 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 48
Thanks Received: 84


Quoting 
Actually, NinjaTrader 7 backtesting is much faster than 6.5. Below are several benchmarks we posted on our website some time ago. NinjaTrader does not impose any throttling of data transfer rates. I would imagine that this is a function of your internet line quality? If you are connected to your data provider after an optimization/ backtest is complete, you click on a chart and on this chart, the start date is older than the available data in your local cache then yes, NinjaTrader will try to get the data. The logic for this is explained ( Historical & Real-time Data) go to the section “When does NinjaTrader load historical data?”. You can bypass this logic if you ensure that you are disconnected during backtesting. Then when a chart is clicked, it will only load the data available from your local cache which of course is a lot faster than loading from the market data service. I am not sure why you felt the need to reset the data base…but for NinjaTrader 7, resetting the database has absolutely no impact on historical data since historical data is now stored separately in files.

Case 1
Backtesting of our SampleMACrossOver strategy on 50 tick ES series on approximately three months of historical data
Version 6.5 - Peak RAM usage of 1.2 GB, 550 MB retained in memory after backtest completion in about 4 minutes
Version 7 - Peak RAM usage never exceeded 110 MB and backtest completion in about 40 seconds

Case 2
Backtesting of our SampleMACrossOver strategy on 50 tick ES series on approximately 1 year of historical data
Version 6.5 - Failed with out of memory exception
Version 7 - Peak RAM usage of 140 MB with a completion time of less than 3 minutes


Answered as exepcted.

No, it isn't my line quality, perhaps its yours,? I'm an ISP, I have 8mbit here and 10mbit at the office, NT data is always slow for me.

Yes you can go through all the menus and turn off the historic data, but then when you actually want to load the historic data you then have to either do it manually or go back in and change that setting. Just a little toggle button to turn on and off historic data quickly and easily would be a big improvment on functionality for the user I think.

I didn't say RESET the database at all, I said REPAIR.

WHY did I have to repair it ? Geez, well, the first time because 12 months of tick data became 3 days after the backtest, and the second time after loading the tick data the last 24 hours of my live chart for that instrument dissappeared and reloading the historic data didn't fix it .... the repair and restart did, not fun while in the middle of a live trade, which I was.


Yes NT7 is faster when doing the number crunching in back testing, it uses 4 cores of my CPU, but once that number crunching part stops, it drops back to 1 thread to move all the data around, and with a useful amount of tick data it is simply too slow still. Granted there is some improvment over 6.5, it is still a frustrating expereince using it. My PC here is a 3Ghz Core Quad extreme, 1TB HDD 3.2 Gig usable RAM.

Sorry I think you need to speed up and fix up the NT database. Anyway real system needs to be optimized on years of tick data if it has even a hope of surviving an unkown future ... it just isn't possible to do that with NT still. Your back test results use a max on 1 year tick data, how about testing it on useful amounts of tick data.

Reply With Quote
  #607 (permalink)
 
NinjaTrader's Avatar
 NinjaTrader  NinjaTrader is an official Site Sponsor
Site Sponsor

Web: NinjaTrader
AMA: Ask Me Anything
Webinars: NinjaTrader Webinars
Elite offer: Click here
 
Posts: 1,713 since May 2010
Thanks Given: 203
Thanks Received: 2,686


webart View Post
No, it isn't my line quality, perhaps its yours,? I'm an ISP, I have 8mbit here and 10mbit at the office, NT data is always slow for me.
.

I am sorry to know that the data download has always been slow for you. I would not know why that would be the case and would be happy to have my IT Manager work with you to understand why this is so. My original intent in addressing you was the statement you made in your original post that the data download is throttled at 25 kbits which was an inaccuracy. NinjaTrader historical data servers are hosted at Interactive Data 7 Ticks ( [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#800080]http://7ticks.com/index.php/productsandservices/content/id/Trading+Infrastructure+Services[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]) and I just heard back from them that they have not had any performance issues relative to our servers as of late. To be sure, we ran some tests this morning and are getting 1.73 Mbps.


Quoting 
Yes you can go through all the menus and turn off the historic data, but then when you actually want to load the historic data you then have to either do it manually or go back in and change that setting. Just a little toggle button to turn on and off historic data quickly and easily would be a big improvment on functionality for the user I think.

Yes, there is an option to do this however, the easier approach that I posted before is to either make sure you are not continuously requesting more data than you have in your local cache or simply disconnect when you run your backtest. This will ensure that NinjaTrader does not attempt to load data from the market data source.




Quoting 
I didn't say RESET the database at all, I said REPAIR.

WHY did I have to repair it ? Geez, well, the first time because 12 months of tick data became 3 days after the backtest, and the second time after loading the tick data the last 24 hours of my live chart for that instrument dissappeared and reloading the historic data didn't fix it .... the repair and restart did, not fun while in the middle of a live trade, which I was.

The point I was making was that that any action (Repair or Reset) on the database has no impact on historical data since historical data is stored separately from the database in NinjaTrader 7. Whatever issue you experienced here, I am more than happy to help resolve. Please send an email to our support, attention to “RayD” and I will assign it to someone on my team that will follow up directly with you.



Quoting 
Yes NT7 is faster when doing the number crunching in back testing, it uses 4 cores of my CPU, but once that number crunching part stops, it drops back to 1 thread to move all the data around, and with a useful amount of tick data it is simply too slow still. Granted there is some improvment over 6.5, it is still a frustrating expereince using it. My PC here is a 3Ghz Core Quad extreme, 1TB HDD 3.2 Gig usable RAM.


You are right, it’s faster. You had stated in your original post that “nothing has changed” which is I felt does not reflect the facts. The single threaded operation you speak of likely is the exploration of individual backtest results at the conclusion of an optimization while viewing the chart tab? In this case, each time you select a backtest result the backtest is executed again for that specific set of optimized parameters so each trade of the backtest can be plotted on the chart. If you have an extremely large data set and/or a comprehensive strategy that can generate a lot of trades then you are right, it will take time and I don’t dispute that it does not meet your personal requirements. However, just viewing the “Summary” tab for each backtest results is instant since each of the results summary data are stored in memory.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #608 (permalink)
 webart 
Australia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Posts: 106 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 48
Thanks Received: 84

<quote>The point I was making was that that any action (Repair or Reset) on the database has no impact on historical data since historical data is stored separately from the database in NinjaTrader 7. </quote>

Part of my procedure to fix things, is to delete the data from the historic data manager and then reload it, so I guess that's what fixed the problem rather than the DB repair.


Nothing has changed in the sense that I went to do some back testing in NT and ended up with data problems again and it is still very slow. Even with just 2 years of tick data, try running an optimization then click on an equity graph, there is a very long delay for that graph to load, click on another one, another long delay, click on the chart, another long delay ... it's painfully slow in that area.

Yes, fair enough in that NT7 has changed over NT6.5. NT7 dosn't crash everytime you try and backtest a decent amount of data like NT6.5 does and the number crunching is quicker, however based on my 1 night of backtesting on a new NT7 install, I was dissapointed to end up in the same old position with data missing issues.

I've paid alot of money over the last 3 and half years, in that time it has been almost immpossible to use the software for backtesting productively. Alot of time and money for alot of problems and software that wouldn't do what it was suppose to do over that period, I was really hoping to come back to it now and have a painless experience.

AS for contacting support, I've already been through these data issues with them about 20 times over the years, I don't have time to start another round at the moment. Anyway in the past I think everytime the solution has been for me to do even more work on my side deleting, uninstalling and resetting stuff and loosing old backtest results etc in the process.




Reply With Quote
  #609 (permalink)
 fluxsmith 
Santa Maria
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, ThinkOrSwim
Broker: Mirus/Zen-Fire
Trading: ES
Posts: 290 since May 2010
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 322


webart View Post
...NT may be ok for chart trading, but it is next to useless still at backtesting using tick data. You should be able to throw atleast 5 years of tick data at it, but it struggles with 1 and is so so so slow.

Nothing changes.

I used to backtest with a tick dataseries but gave up on that a long time ago. I never blamed Ninja, it's just more data than my computer had the memory to deal with. I now use a 1 tick range bar instead. I've had no problem with that, and can't think of any reason the results would be any less valid.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #610 (permalink)
 
tderrick's Avatar
 tderrick 
Nashville, Tennessee
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja / Jigsaw / 9G
Broker: AMP / CQG
Trading: NQ, YM and ES
Posts: 1,588 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 4,260
Thanks Received: 2,532



casey44 View Post
NT Support, would just like to say thanks for taking the time to give attention to this thead. Obviously you won't hear so much from those who've only had a good experience with NT.


I did lot's of research online before landing on Ninja as my first Trading Platform. I am very pleased
and have never had a problem I couldn't resolve myself. ...meaning, normal computing issues.

NT may be my first and last platform. I need nothing else.

Good work, Ninja Trader.


AJ
Nashville, Tennessee


"Life On The Edge of SR"
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on April 22, 2017


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts