Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
In NT8 C# what does an Unmanaged strategy need to do
to dynamically switch between 2 available Order routing brokers, e.g.
Rithmic to CQG ? ...within the same Strategy code.
Code snippets please.
Thanks !!!! hyperscalper
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
No can do. Well, you "can" but it doesn't work. I coded a toolbar drop list where I could switch from all my accounts and it worked like a champ as long as I was using a sim account. But the second I switched to a real money account it went nuts... It never placed my stop orders and my chart seemed to freeze.
*Willing to pay extra for a reliable Indicator/Strategy Code that consistently makes money*
Hi,
I trade Futures using NinjaTrader platform (ver8). I would highly appreciate it if someone gets in touch with me to discuss the purchase of a reliable indicator code that consistently makes money.
I started doubting if such a thing even exist, after a multiple failed trials. I can be reached at
Aleneziak@gmail .com or mobile: +966552218218
Assuming you are new to trading, the concept of an indicator that consistently makes money and can be purchased for a fee is a highly improbable one: if such a thing existed and consistenly made money why would anyone sell it to others?
Also note, I would advise against providing your personal details, you can fall prey to all sort of scams.
You can edit/amend your post up to 24 hours to remove any such details if you wish, but it's up to you.
I am sure all of us sympathize with the desire to beat the markets. I have stuff like
that, but it's all proprietary. Putting something out there means support; and I've
just gotten out of that mindset.
Being a purely technical trader myself, I worked coding for 4 months; but that was on the
back of a previous decade of research and development on Analytics through to Scalping. Being able to "ride the bucking bronco" of the market requires so much
focus and high technology, in my view, that it's hard to distill that within some fairly
simple "for sale" indicator or strategy module.
[edit] I would just add that all of my current work is focussed on ONE THING, and that
is the Futures Nasdaq NQ via multiple (dozens of) MNQ contracts,
so 1) FOCUS and extreme specialization are
what you should be striving for. 2) I assume you can code up asynchronous multi-threaded
C# in NT8's framework; since that will certainly be able to give you an edge.
Well, you're right, there isn't such a thing. Looking for it will just get you into more failed trials. If all it took were buying an indicator, everyone would just buy it and we would all be rich. Since not everyone is a billionaire, it may not be that simple.
Experience, trial and error, learning about the markets and learning about yourself will be more valuable to you. Some traders do quite well with just moving averages and a price chart. Some have elaborate charts filled with custom indicators. It is not really the method, it is the use that the trader makes of it that matters.
The sooner you stop looking for the indicator or method that will let you consistently make money, the sooner you will find your own way to move forward.
Good luck, and do yourself a favor and stop looking for pre-made trading solutions. There aren't any.
Bob.
When one door closes, another opens.
-- Cervantes, Don Quixote
just kidding...
