NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Is It Time to Move to NT 7?


Discussion in NinjaTrader

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Fat Tails with 22 posts (30 thanks)
    2. looks_two Silvester17 with 17 posts (5 thanks)
    3. looks_3 MetalTrade with 13 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 11 posts (7 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one TheWizard with 2.5 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Fat Tails with 1.4 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Zondor with 1.4 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 0.6 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 48,421 views
    2. thumb_up 117 thanks given
    3. group 26 followers
    1. forum 158 posts
    2. attach_file 9 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Is It Time to Move to NT 7?

  #151 (permalink)
 rcseidel 
Lake Havasu City, AZ
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Trading: euro
Posts: 2 since Feb 2011
Thanks Given: 5
Thanks Received: 1

Switched over from nt 6.5 to nt 7 last week. I had downloaded numerous indicators into nt 6.5. From
all appearance, the more numerous the indicators, the slower the performance....along with a few crashes along the way. With nt 7 I plan to refrain from adding indicators for awhile to see if the program maintains
its snappy performance. Also running onbarclose=true on all indicators as recommended. I don't know if these
issues will affect in the long term since my knowledge of these matters is quite limited This has just been my
eperience so far...it may be different with others members. Good day!

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Diary of a simple price action trader
26 thanks
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
24 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
22 thanks
My NQ Trading Journal
16 thanks
HumbleTraders next chapter
9 thanks
  #152 (permalink)
 Babool 
Detroit, MI
 
Experience: Master
Platform: Sierra Chart
Trading: NQ, CL, ES, GC
Posts: 95 since Jul 2011
Thanks Given: 17
Thanks Received: 125

I have this running on a couple of machines and both work great. I have never had any kind of freeze or lock-up at all. My workspace is pretty simple with only 4 charts and market analyzer and 2 doms. I have never have done any backtesting or used any of the other capabilities that ninja offers so that could be it. I also run investor rt and really like that as well. The ninja chart trader is really nice.

Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)
 
Zondor's Avatar
 Zondor 
Portland Oregon, United States
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjatraderŽ
Broker: CQG, Kinetick
Trading: Gameplay KlownbineŽ Trading of Globex
Posts: 1,333 since Jul 2009
Thanks Given: 1,246
Thanks Received: 2,731


For most indicators, the performance reduction due to setting COBC=false is negligible.

When it's an issue, it's generally because the indicator is poorly coded and performs huge numbers of operations that are totally redundant and unnecessary. We have a thread on this subject:



NT7 is orders of magnitude better in terms of indicator processing power.

Anyone still using 6.5 at this point is just asking for trouble.

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #154 (permalink)
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 Fat Tails 
Berlin, Europe
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
Posts: 9,888 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 4,242
Thanks Received: 27,102


Zondor View Post
For most indicators, the performance reduction due to setting COBC=false is negligible.

When it's an issue, it's generally because the indicator is poorly coded and performs huge numbers of operations that are totally redundant and unnecessary. We have a thread on this subject:



NT7 is orders of magnitude better in terms of indicator processing power.

Anyone still using 6.5 at this point is just asking for trouble.

I must say that I strongly disagree. If there is a news release and you happen to trade ES you may have thousands of ticks per minute. If you trade a 1-minute chart and you set the indicator to CalculateOnBarClose = true, OnBarUpdate() will be running once per minute. However if you set it to CalculateOnBarClose = false, it may be running thousand times per minute. I believe that this has an impact on performance.

If you set several indicator to CalculateOnBarClose = false, those thousand times may freeze up NinjaTrader, even if your indicators are properly coded. Only use the setting CalculateOnBarClose = false, if you really need it.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #155 (permalink)
sunshinehill
TORONTO;ONTARIO;CANADA
 
Posts: 2 since Dec 2011
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Received: 2

sunny from canada
I am very happy with NT7 when i switched over from NT6.5 I only use BB; CCI and EMA-20 so my setup is very simple using candlesticks on my charts for CL;GC; and TF on 1 min charts and referring to 5 min charts for trends. NT7 has never frozen on me using CQG. happy trading
ps big mike i have learned more from this forum than anywhere else i have gone to on the internet and i thank everyone for putting great things in their posts.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #156 (permalink)
 
Zondor's Avatar
 Zondor 
Portland Oregon, United States
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjatraderŽ
Broker: CQG, Kinetick
Trading: Gameplay KlownbineŽ Trading of Globex
Posts: 1,333 since Jul 2009
Thanks Given: 1,246
Thanks Received: 2,731


Quoting 
For most indicators, the performance reduction due to setting COBC=false is negligible.

I can't believe I said that, it is totally wrong.

However I have spent the last few weeks going through every indicator I have, and eliminating huge amounts of totally unnecessary intrabar processing built in to the great majority of them. Some of the Ninjatrader system indicators are among the most flagrant offenders.

For most indicators it's pretty easy to get an average 70% CPU load reduction just by rejecting redundant intrabar ticks that have no effect on the output value of the indicator. THEN you can start dealing with loops and function calls that are being executed on every tick but only need to run once per bar, instances of external indicators that are not explicitly defined, etc and get some huge load reductions and performance improvements.

Too bad nobody thought of doing this in the Ninjatrader 6.5 days. Now with more efficient indicators, maybe we should go back since so many people had strong emotional attachments to 6.5. Maybe we can get it to run on the Commodore 64 hardware platform. Or a Babbage Analytical Engine powered by a water wheel.

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.charlesbabbage.net/different-engine-2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.charlesbabbage.net/&h=340&w=299&sz=23&tbnid=8YJIUtt_1oK1LM:&tbnh=92&tbnw=81&zoom=1&docid=3M2mXHNYt6G_aM&sa=X&ei=drAGT7zCB4HQiALb5bW2CQ&ved=0CDwQ9QEwAg&dur=4522

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #157 (permalink)
 syxforex 
British Columbia
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NINJA
Broker: ZEN
Trading: Crude
Posts: 1,091 since May 2010

This may be the wrong place to ask this question but since we are talking about cpu useage, does anybody know whether there is a significant difference in cpu resources consumption between nt7 superdom and chart trader?

thanks

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)
 syxforex 
British Columbia
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NINJA
Broker: ZEN
Trading: Crude
Posts: 1,091 since May 2010

Answered this for myself, survey says, no difference...

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 Fat Tails 
Berlin, Europe
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
Posts: 9,888 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 4,242
Thanks Received: 27,102


syxforex View Post
This may be the wrong place to ask this question but since we are talking about cpu useage, does anybody know whether there is a significant difference in cpu resources consumption between nt7 superdom and chart trader?

thanks

I think that neither chart trader nor superdom affect the CPU in a significant way. CPU resources are used by complex calculations performed by indicators or strategies.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on April 15, 2012


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts