NT8 Performance Analysis Thoughts - NinjaTrader Programming | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


NT8 Performance Analysis Thoughts
Updated: Views / Replies:764 / 20
Created: by jflaggs Attachments:3

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 3  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

NT8 Performance Analysis Thoughts

  #1 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Los Angeles + California/United States
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: NinjaTrader, TradeStation
Favorite Futures: Forex, Stocks, Currency
 
Posts: 17 since Aug 2017
Thanks: 7 given, 0 received

NT8 Performance Analysis Thoughts

Hello,

We are developing a strategy that, so far, has shown promise. However, we are having trouble getting around spread commissions. We're curious what type of performance others are looking for in a "good" strategy so that we can start to understand how this strategy compares.

At first glance, we were happy with the performance analysis...until I realized that after commissions we are essentially at break even regardless of the decent performance results. The image shown is for 4 months of market replay on USDJPY and I am calculating commissions based on a constant spread of 1.4p. All trades are sized at 1 lot.

So my questions stands, how good does a strategy need to be in order to beat commissions evilness? Placing just 1.85 trades per day on average has earned me total spread commissions nearly equal to my net profit for 4 months. Your thoughts are appreciated.

Attached Thumbnails
NT8 Performance Analysis Thoughts-pips.png   NT8 Performance Analysis Thoughts-usd.png  
Reply With Quote
 
  #2 (permalink)
Quick Summary
Quick Summary Post

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.

 
  #3 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Favorite Futures: ES, YM, 6E
 
Posts: 2,642 since Feb 2013
Thanks: 4,900 given, 6,435 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


If you didn't (over)optimize the system before, the results are not bad.

One of your next steps could be a deeper look into the MAE / MFE profile of your trades.
Average losses are (very) high compared with the average wins.

If you can cut some relatively large losing trades without losing too many of your winners,
that could solve much of your commission problem.

Reply With Quote
 
  #4 (permalink)
Elite Member
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT8/JIGSAW
Broker/Data: MacQuarie Futures/AMP Clearing/CQG
Favorite Futures: ZB/FGBL/GC/CL/HG/6J/6M/6B/FDAX/NQ
 
xiaosi's Avatar
 
Posts: 483 since Feb 2012
Thanks: 381 given, 440 received

I heard one time a good rule of thumb was to have a minimum average trade of greater than $50 usd after slippage and commission. This was for intraday systems. Makes sense to me as a hurdle.

Reply With Quote
 
  #5 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Los Angeles + California/United States
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: NinjaTrader, TradeStation
Favorite Futures: Forex, Stocks, Currency
 
Posts: 17 since Aug 2017
Thanks: 7 given, 0 received

choke35, xiaosi,

Thanks for your comments. There is no back testing optimization done here. I will look into improving the MAE/MFE profiles. I can limit the risk a bit more, and possibly take more profits, but that will decrease the 80%+ accuracy that I enjoy seeing. No free lunch right?

Xiaosi, very good point. In fact, exactly half of these trades are simply breaking even with themselves after commissions by design. I will need to take more profit than that.

Would it make a difference to trade a different instrument or market? I haven't looked into it much, but I know that I could get lower commissions with a similar return if I trade stocks because I can get a flat fee of $10 round trip vs the $30 I am paying for FX. Any insight on how futures commissions would compare? Or another instrument?

Reply With Quote
 
  #6 (permalink)
Seth
Salt Lake City, Utah
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: Jigsaw, NinjaTrader8
Favorite Futures: ZB
 
Posts: 403 since Apr 2016
Thanks: 15 given, 302 received

Here's how I think about this in my mind. All strategies can be plotted on a grid with probability on the x axis, and average win/average loss on the y axis. The center of the graph will be 50% for probability, and 1 for where your average win is equal to your average loss. Something like this:

Please register on futures.io to view futures trading content such as post attachment(s), image(s), and screenshot(s).


The further away from the center of the grid we get, the less common that trade is. We don't want our strategy to be too far from the center or we won't make as much due to too many trades. We also can't be too close to the center or we lose money on commissions.

Most strategies that work for retail traders fall along the two axises:

The first group follows the Y axis. These are strategies where your average win is twice as big as your average loss or more. Such trades could have a probability between 35-55% win rate. Such strategies tend to be more trend based as in order to make twice as much as your risk you'll have to catch some sort of trending move.

The other group follows the X axis with trades that have a higher probability. These are scalping or mean revision types of strategies. These trades tend to have a probability of between 60-80%. The average profit / average loss should probably be above .5, although I suggest looking for trades where the risk/reward are equal.

There's also the big banks area. These trades are probably unicorns, but certainly exist. If you have a trade like this you probably trade someone else's money.

So you fit more in the scalping type of category, but you're just under the break even line. Your average loss compared to your average win is too high. I suggest trying to get that ratio closer to 1:1.

Reply With Quote
The following 6 users say Thank You to TWDsje for this post:
 
  #7 (permalink)
Elite Member
Houston, TX
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Favorite Futures: CL, GC, LE
 
Posts: 40 since Apr 2016
Thanks: 85 given, 18 received

Let's see those performance numbers after you add in commission and slippage :-)

Reply With Quote
 
  #8 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Los Angeles + California/United States
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: NinjaTrader, TradeStation
Favorite Futures: Forex, Stocks, Currency
 
Posts: 17 since Aug 2017
Thanks: 7 given, 0 received

TWDsje,

That's an awesome graphical representation of the problem and how to work towards solving it. Thank you very much for the good input, Yes, mathematically you're absolutely correct in that we should be at 1:1 for the accuracy we're seeing in order to make it out of the commissions band in your area plot. I think that this is a good generalization--much better than simply trying to trade an instrument or market with lower commissions.


ShatteredX,

Slippage is set to 2p which is fairly realistic, so it's the commissions that are troubling. The performance numbers will be the same after commissions are added, but the net profit will be much less. This tells me that it has potential, but needs some work in the win:loss ratio as others have pointed out in this thread.

Reply With Quote
 
  #9 (permalink)
Elite Member
Christchurch, New Zealand
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: SC
Broker/Data: IB, BC, Dx Feed
Favorite Futures: US Equities
 
Neo1's Avatar
 
Posts: 422 since Jul 2014
Thanks: 470 given, 470 received


jflaggs View Post
choke35, xiaosi,

Thanks for your comments. There is no back testing optimization done here. I will look into improving the MAE/MFE profiles. I can limit the risk a bit more, and possibly take more profits, but that will decrease the 80%+ accuracy that I enjoy seeing. No free lunch right?

Xiaosi, very good point. In fact, exactly half of these trades are simply breaking even with themselves after commissions by design. I will need to take more profit than that.

Would it make a difference to trade a different instrument or market? I haven't looked into it much, but I know that I could get lower commissions with a similar return if I trade stocks because I can get a flat fee of $10 round trip vs the $30 I am paying for FX. Any insight on how futures commissions would compare? Or another instrument?

$10 per round trip? sounds expensive, unless you are trading 1000s on units per trade?

"Free markets work because they allow people to be lucky, thanks to aggressive trial and error, not by giving rewards or incentives for skill. The strategy is, then, to tinker as much as possible and try to collect as many Black Swan opportunities as you can"
Reply With Quote
 
  #10 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Los Angeles + California/United States
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: NinjaTrader, TradeStation
Favorite Futures: Forex, Stocks, Currency
 
Posts: 17 since Aug 2017
Thanks: 7 given, 0 received



Neo1 View Post
$10 per round trip? sounds expensive, unless you are trading 1000s on units per trade?

That's the commissions fee for TradeStation. Either .01/share or flat 5 bucks. I wouldn't be interested in trading less than 500 shares for the sub $300/share stocks that I follow, so 5 bucks in and 5 bucks out is the better deal. Which platform allows you to trade 500+ shares for less than that? I haven't looked around much yet.

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > > NT8 Performance Analysis Thoughts

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Jigsaw Trading: TBA

Elite only

FuturesTrader71: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

Jan 18

RandBots: TBA

Jan 23

GFF Brokers & CME Group: Futures & Bitcoin

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Webinar: Recordkeeping and Trade Performance Analysis w/FuturesTrader71 Big Mike Psychology and Money Management 8 August 14th, 2017 12:22 PM
Why would Strategy Performance differ in NT7 vs NT8? Aufidius NinjaTrader Programming 3 August 4th, 2015 04:31 AM
Scattered thoughts... Lornz Off-Topic 210 June 15th, 2012 06:02 AM
Thanksgiving Thoughts Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 November 25th, 2011 12:10 AM
Random Thoughts.... AynRandFan Traders Hideout 7 July 24th, 2011 06:52 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55 PM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-13 in 0.15 seconds with 20 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.163.209.109