New Mortgage Rules Stricter Than Many Banks Had Hoped - News and Current Events | futures trading

Go Back

> Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Traders Hideout > News and Current Events

New Mortgage Rules Stricter Than Many Banks Had Hoped
Started:March 29th, 2011 (02:30 PM) by Quick Summary Views / Replies:648 / 1
Last Reply:March 29th, 2011 (02:54 PM) Attachments:0

Welcome to

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Thread Tools Search this Thread

New Mortgage Rules Stricter Than Many Banks Had Hoped

Old March 29th, 2011, 02:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
Quick Summary
New Mortgage Rules Stricter Than Many Banks Had Hoped

Regulators rejected the most expansive versions of a qualified residential mortgage, which would have exempted virtually every mortgage that banks are making.

More on CNBC...

Reply to share your thoughts on this current event.


Old March 29th, 2011, 02:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Fortitudo et Honor
Austin, TX
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: Futures
Posts: 882 since Mar 2011
Thanks: 128 given, 700 received

There's so much to talk about on this issue.

When you look at most catastrophes, they're almost always a "confluence" of events, where if you were to remove any one of the components, the catastrophe generally would have been averted or at least the end result would have been drastically reduced.

The housing bubble is obviously complicated....but it's this type of regulation that created the problem in the first place. When you "fix" free markets through regulations, many times, the results have many unintended consequences which are impossible to anticipate.

That is a huge tenet of libertarianism...that the government solution should be the last option, because free markets are inherently self's only when the government interferes and tries to fix it till it's broken.

Liberals would argue that it's lack of regulation that caused the whole mess, and they miss the boat.

The housing burst started with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. (You can thank Barney Frank and crew). That actually forced banks to make high risk loans to "sub prime" underqualified lenders.

Without this new supply of sub prime loans, the demand for housing that became gluttony would never have been possible. The "sub prime" mortgage is essentially, the fuel which fed the fire. With no fuel, you can have all the spark and fire hazard you want with no inferno.

Combine government backed and invested sub prime mortgages through FHA/FNMA/Freddie with mountains of monopoly money supplied by the Fed (a discussion for another time) and you end up with a market that's rife with fraud waste and abuse. Crooks are crooks, they always have been, so by the government sponsoring FHA and subprime loans, all they did was allow the crooks to feed upon people who many times, didn't know any better.

Furthermore, it's government "regulation" through our bailout of the banks that perpetuates this crap. Had we not bailed them out, they'd be self governing investors and boards would require their own internal regulations to protect their own PRIVATE capital investments.

When you add on the obscurity of bond ratings for credit swaps and the difficulty in assigning risk to an asset that's blended with all sorts of varying degrees of loan default rates, and now you have a system that as I said...started out with good intentions (help the little guy get a house and make sure the banks don't fail and hurt us all) and what you end up with is a recipe for giant disaster.

You have to ask yourself....why would the government have to come to the aid of any private entity? Because no private investors are confident to put their own skin into it.

If we remove the subprime market, or the Fed, even with crooked mortgage brokers, there are no funds to loan frivolously and no victims to feed upon....the skeezy mortgage brokers all go out of business. Even if you have crooked bond rating companies, there are no loan packages full of high risk loans to screw up the ratings to otherwise responsible investors. Even if you have irresponsible builders who over supply, there's no excess demand because again, there's no huge influx of subprime market buyers.

The bottom line is that it was government interference that got us into this mess, and unless you're able to accurately recognize ROOT CAUSE, then more government interference is exactly what people are clammering for and exactly NOT what we need.

We need free markets that correct themselves where firms are motivated by greed AND fear....fear of competition, fear of failure.....etc. What we have now is greed with little fear and you can't "inject" artificial fear into the system via regulations.....they'll just be a smarter group of crooks who find a way around it. You have to have a natural, free market that corrects's the only thing that seems to be too smart or beyond manipulation by crooks.

I'm not saying all regulation is bad....we have to have some....I'm just saying that when you monkey with free markets, you'd better be prepared for undesirable and unintended consquences (including a false sense of safety).

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to RM99 for this post:

Reply > Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Traders Hideout > News and Current Events > New Mortgage Rules Stricter Than Many Banks Had Hoped

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

An Afternoon with FIO trader bobwest

Elite only

NinjaTrader 8: Programming Profitable Trading Edges w/Scott Hodson

Elite only

Anthony Drager: Executing on Intermarket Correlations & Order Flow, Part 2

Elite only

Adam Grimes: Five critically important keys to professional trading

Elite only

Machine Learning Concepts w/FIO member NJAMC

Elite only

MarketDelta Cloud Platform: Announcing new mobile features

Dec 1

NinjaTrader 8: Features and Enhancements

Dec 6

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two Big US Banks Exit the Reverse-Mortgage Business Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 June 18th, 2011 11:00 AM
Wall Street Banks Facing New Probe Into Mortgage Practices Quick Summary News and Current Events 2 May 17th, 2011 11:00 AM
Major Banks Under Pressure To Revamp Foreclosure Rules Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 March 5th, 2011 12:30 PM
Basel Rules Gives US Banks Advantage Over Rivals: Bove Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 September 13th, 2010 11:20 AM
Banks Seek to Keep Profits as New Oversight Rules Loom Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 July 16th, 2010 03:10 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Copyright © 2016 by All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts

Page generated 2016-10-23 in 0.08 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP