Hidden Financial Bombs: Margin Calls Hit Hedge Funds Speculating in Freddie/Fannie Bo - News and Current Events | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Hidden Financial Bombs: Margin Calls Hit Hedge Funds Speculating in Freddie/Fannie Bo
Updated: Views / Replies:136 / 0
Created: by kbit Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Hidden Financial Bombs: Margin Calls Hit Hedge Funds Speculating in Freddie/Fannie Bo

  #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,872 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,301 given, 3,332 received

Hidden Financial Bombs: Margin Calls Hit Hedge Funds Speculating in Freddie/Fannie Bo

Markets are more dangerous than ever before because six years of radical financial repression by the central banks have planted booby-traps everywhere. Ground zero consists of massive and reckless speculation in newly invented “structured finance” products which were designed to quench the market’s insatiable thirst for yield in the Fed’s whacky world of ZIRP.

So below is news of margin calls on hedge funds that had piled into a 12 month old product called “risk sharing RMBS bonds”. It seems that Wall Street dealers had provided 80% leverage on these new fangled securities issued by the nation’s accomplished market wreckers—Fannie and Freddie. Various tranches of this new variant of synthetic CDOs—-that is, the Wall Street created toxic waste that blew-up in 2007-2008—- offered yields of 200-700 basis points over LIBOR, but so great was the demand for an alternative to the Bernanke-Yellen ukase of zero return that prices of the first Freddie Mac issue were driven up by 30% over the past year.

Now imagine that. Speculators purchased newly invented and unseasoned securities from proven financial malefactors on 80% leverage and then saw their price rise by 30% in 12 months, meaning that the return on their own invested equity was a cool 150%. Stated differently, the scramble for yield got so frenzied that securities originally issued at a yield premium of 7.15% over LIBOR last summer had soared to the point that they yielded only 2.5% over LIBOR before the market broke a few weeks ago. A recent WSJ article captured the thought that irrational exuberance had indeed erupted in this newly invented “asset class”:

But, the rally was overextended by investors’ search for yield as Federal Reserve stimulus cut returns on safer assets, some investors said. Prices on Freddie Mac’s first issue of July 2013 had soared more than 30% through May, reducing yield premiums over the one-month London interbank offered rate to 2.5 percentage points from 7.15 percentage points.

“Investors got too complacent,” Mr. Hentemann said. “They kept buying high-yielding assets to a point where prices and yields didn’t compensate you for the risk.”

Given the financial mayhem that the GSE had already caused, it might be asked why the government’s bankrupt housing guarantee agencies were back in the fray peddling a new form of securitized snake oil in the Wall Street casino. The answer is that some well-intended bureaucrats at the GSE regulatory agency told them to off-load onto private capital markets some of the GSEs’ accumulated risk to the taxpayers.

So the financial engineers at Freddie Mac invented what should have been a completely unsaleable product. Namely, an unsecured bond of an agency that might be heading for legislative extinction that was based not on what real homeowners were obligated to pay on their mortgages, but on the theoretical possibility that they wouldn’t pay! Specifically, the fat yields being offered were to be derived from the default performance of a reference group of $30 billion of Freddie’s guaranteed mortgages.

In other words, there was no real collateral at all and no real mortgage borrower cash interest to pay the alluring 700 basis point yields on the lower tranches of the offering. It was all synthetic——that is, computer generated waterfalls of digital money flowing down the tranches of something called “STACR” or Structured Agency Credit Risk bonds.

And how would an investor evaluate this purported risk? Well, he would simply have to drink the Washington Cool-Aid which holds that Keynesian money printing is reviving the US economy and housing market. Therefore, housing prices will continue to rise, mortgage delinquencies will continue to fall and the reference portfolio of $30 billion mortgages will continue to trigger full payment on the various tiers of STACR obligations.

Another word for this would be rank speculation. Even in an honest free market with two-way trade, it would be nearly impossible to accurately price the “pot of risk” extracted from GSE mortgage pools that these new “structured finance” products actually represent. But in a financial system bubbling with speculative fevers, cheap debt and an assumed central bank “put” under the stock averages and risk assets generally, “price discovery” is literally impossible.

This whole story is about speculative short-term gambling. Not surprisingly, therefore, the recent 10% break in prices for this newly manufactured form of GSE toxic waste threw the tiny and illiquid market for these securities into a tailspin.

Hedge funds piled aggressively into the riskier (and often unrated) tranches of the deals, looking for yield pick-up at a time when returns had shrunk dramatically just about everywhere else.

But those deals have recently tumbled dramatically. Between July 11 and July 29, the unrated bonds favored by hedge funds gapped out as much as 50bp to roughly LIBOR plus 330bp in the secondary market, according to Wells Fargo data.

“Generally the sell-off has all the signs of a levered unwind,” the mortgage strategist said.

In short, Wall Street prime brokers looking for trades and spreads offered cheap carry trade financing to the “credit” oriented hedge funds so that they could arb the GSE risk-sharing RMBS bonds based on money market interest rates that are pegged and controlled by the Fed. Needless to say, were the Fed to actually begin normalizing short-term money market rates, the recent disorder and margin calls in this market would amount to a mere Sunday School picnic. And if the current already 61 month long business cycle expansion should meet its inexorable end and roll-over into another recession, the watchword would be “look-out below!”

Yet here’s the thing. The structured finance product calls STACRs issued by the GSEs are just a tiny microcosm, and a tepid one at that, of the trillions in structured finance products that have been issued by Wall Street dealers and their counterparts around the world. Overwhelmingly, these products are not backed by real collateral or cash flows, but instead, are the embodiment of computerized algorithms based on reference pools of other securities—-some of these being synthetics, too.

So the central banks have unleashed a devils work shop. The story below provides but a glimpse of their handiwork. When the massive tide of central bank liquidity and cheap debt finally begins to recede, there will be margin calls everywhere. And the list of exploding acronyms like STACRS will stretch on as far as the eye can see.



From Reuters Hedgeworld

Several hedge funds have received margin calls in recent days on their holdings of risk-sharing RMBS bonds from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, market sources told IFR.

The sources said the margin calls were met, but the event still unnerved the structured finance market, which has again become reliant on cheap leverage to sustain momentum.

One banker said brokers’ margin calls required the hedge funds to pony up an extra four to five points of their equity against what they initially borrowed to purchase the bonds – understood to be more than 80% of the purchase price in some cases – to cover any losses.

“Dealers that lead these trades offer attractive financing of two to three times leverage,” one mortgage strategist said. “But if the investor is forced to unwind, it can get ugly.”

In the first quarter, some hedge funds were locking in 30-day repurchase agreements to buy risk-sharing bonds at a rate of 1.9% to lever 2.14 times, according to SEC filings.

Risk-sharing RMBS are barely a year old, having sprung up as a new asset class after U.S. regulators issued guidelines urging the government to reduce its footprint in the massive U.S. residential mortgage market.

Hedge funds piled aggressively into the riskier (and often unrated) tranches of the deals, looking for yield pick-up at a time when returns had shrunk dramatically just about everywhere else.

But those deals have recently tumbled dramatically. Between July 11 and July 29, the unrated bonds favored by hedge funds gapped out as much as 50bp to roughly LIBOR plus 330bp in the secondary market, according to Wells Fargo data.

“Generally the sell-off has all the signs of a levered unwind,” the mortgage strategist said.

And at a time when volatility is high – Lipper this week reported the largest one-week outflow from high-yield funds ever, at more than $7 billion – the risk-sharing bonds are continuing to struggle.

On Wednesday [Aug. 6] Freddie Mac had to price the unrated tranches of its latest Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR) trade at LIBOR plus 400bp and 410bp – a whopping 100bp to 120bp wide of Fannie Mae’s last risk-sharing deal in July.

And while cheap money certainly enticed some players to buy into the risk-sharing sector in the first place, record volumes lately have led players to look for a way to trade out.

Approximately $135 million in risk-sharing bonds was out for bid in each of the past two weeks, the highest levels by far since the program started in July 2013, according to Adam Murphy, president of market data company Empirasign.

Positive Approach

Despite these stumbles, Freddie Mac is counting on being able to attract a broader base of buy-and-hold investors to the asset class, and remains optimistic.

For one thing, each of Freddie’s four STACR deals prior to July had printed at successively tighter levels, as did the three prior Fannie trades.

“Maybe spreads tightened too much and are now back to a more sustainable level,” Mike Reynolds, a director of portfolio management at Freddie Mac, told IFR.

“We definitely think the investor book should include hedge funds, and it’s natural for them to use [financing] to get the yields they need,” he said. “But we prefer [them] to be a smaller percent of the total distribution.”

And that seems to be happening already. For the 2014-DN3 portion of the new STACR trade, 20% went to hedge funds, down from a 30% participation in April for its DN2 deal, Reynolds said.

Meanwhile the 2014-HQ1 deal – the first from Freddie to include mortgages with loan-to-values above 80% – saw just 5% participation from hedge funds.

Hidden Financial Bombs: Margin Calls Hit Hedge Funds Speculating in Freddie/Fannie Bonds With High Repo Leverage | David Stockman's Contra Corner

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > Hidden Financial Bombs: Margin Calls Hit Hedge Funds Speculating in Freddie/Fannie Bo

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Jigsaw Trading: TBA

Elite only

FuturesTrader71: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

Jan 18

RandBots: TBA

Jan 23

GFF Brokers & CME Group: Futures & Bitcoin

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NYSE Margin Debt At Highest Since July Means Threat Of Margin Calls High kbit News and Current Events 0 April 4th, 2012 02:34 PM
Regulator outlines new plan for Fannie, Freddie kbit News and Current Events 0 February 21st, 2012 09:00 PM
Fannie and Freddie, Still the Socialites kbit News and Current Events 0 October 17th, 2011 02:08 PM
Falling Home Prices Hit Big Banks, Fannie and Freddie Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 May 31st, 2011 02:30 PM
Some Big Banks Want to Take Over Role of Fannie, Freddie Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 January 21st, 2011 03:20 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-15 in 0.11 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.82.56.95