The Case for Ignoring Jennifer Lopez When Making Trades - News and Current Events | futures trading

Go Back

> Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Traders Hideout > News and Current Events

The Case for Ignoring Jennifer Lopez When Making Trades
Started:May 30th, 2014 (07:55 PM) by kbit Views / Replies:107 / 0
Last Reply:May 30th, 2014 (07:55 PM) Attachments:0

Welcome to

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Thread Tools Search this Thread

The Case for Ignoring Jennifer Lopez When Making Trades

Old May 30th, 2014, 07:55 PM   #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,839 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,275 given, 3,321 received

The Case for Ignoring Jennifer Lopez When Making Trades

If you’re a technical analyst who’s been burning the candlestick patterns at both ends, you may want to sit that rounding bottom down because this may cause you to blow your spinning top.

There are people out there these days who believe all that chart watching is a waste of time. Regardless of whether you spot a bullish abandoned baby or a Jennifer Lopez pattern, these critics are convinced it’s mostly all a big fakeout.

Arvid Hoffmann of Maastricht University and Hersh Shefrin of Santa Clara University have a forthcoming paper for the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization that argues individuals who use technical analysis make bad decisions that result in “dramatically lower returns than other investors.”

The finance professors studied traders using a Dutch discount brokerage from 2000 to 2006 and found those employing technical analysis have more concentrated portfolios and face greater non-systemic risks. They trade more often, especially in options, and generally do worse than other investors, the professors find.

Hoffmann and Shefrin put the cost of fixating on charts at 50 basis points, or half a percentage point, per month for the individuals. The frequent trading associated with technical analysis adds another 20 basis points of costs per month, they report. Hat tip to CXO Advisory Group LLC for finding the study.

Of course, you may be thinking: “Leave me alone, I’ve never heard of these guys and I just spotted a gravestone doji that’s going to make my month!”

Here’s someone you may have heard of: Laszlo Birinyi. He’s been right enough times that he’s worth listening to. (In February, he accurately predicted the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index would reach 1,900 this quarter. His latest call is for it to reach 1,970 or higher by the end of September.)

“Technical arguments are sketchy,” reads a Birinyi Associates Inc. report dated May 27. “We have long argued against the technical approach in part because it is regularly more commentary than analysis.”

Concern that the S&P 500’s recent records have not been accompanied by a large number of stocks reaching fresh 52-week highs is unwarranted, according to Birinyi. Less than 10 percent of stocks set new highs when the S&P 500 closed at a record on May 27, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

“This has never been an important measure,” Birinyi wrote above a chart showing the benchmark gauge marching higher long after the 52-week high percentage peaked a year ago.
In Defense

All the criticism has Bloomberg First Word technical analyst William Maloney, a University of Delaware Fightin’ Blue Hens alumni, flapping his hen wings for a chance to defend technicians.

He’ll gladly show you numerous examples of how technical analysis can work effectively: the S&P 500 has consistently rebounded after slipping below its 100-day moving average over the past year. Also, charts of Apple Inc. and U.S. Treasuries show how Fibonacci levels are clearly affecting price action. An isolated survey of individual Dutch traders is not enough to indict the whole discipline, Maloney said.

“I question the Dutch and their risk taking to begin with,” he said, adding a joke: “They did go through a tulip mania.”

The Case for Ignoring Jennifer Lopez When Making Trades - Bloomberg

Reply With Quote

Reply > Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Traders Hideout > News and Current Events > The Case for Ignoring Jennifer Lopez When Making Trades

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

NinjaTrader 8: Programming Profitable Trading Edges w/Scott Hodson

Elite only

Anthony Drager: Executing on Intermarket Correlations & Order Flow, Part 2

Elite only

Adam Grimes: Five critically important keys to professional trading

Elite only

Machine Learning Concepts w/FIO member NJAMC

Elite only

MarketDelta Cloud Platform: Announcing new mobile features

Dec 1

NinjaTrader 8: Features and Enhancements

Dec 6

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any feedback on Rob Booker and Jennifer trading room delta6 Vendors and Product Reviews 5 October 24th, 2013 11:43 AM
Why the Market's Ignoring the No. 1 Threat to Stocks Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 February 15th, 2013 04:10 PM
Mysterious Case Of The Phantom Stock Trades kbit News and Current Events 0 June 24th, 2011 12:13 AM
Everyone's Ignoring The 800 Pound Gorilla In The Room kbit News and Current Events 0 June 14th, 2011 12:47 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Copyright © 2016 by All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts

Page generated 2016-10-28 in 0.07 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP