China to be the Most Important Country in XXI Century - Jim Rogers - News and Current Events | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


China to be the Most Important Country in XXI Century - Jim Rogers
Updated: Views / Replies:319 / 1
Created: by kbit Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 100,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Thread Tools Search this Thread

China to be the Most Important Country in XXI Century - Jim Rogers

  #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,893 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,307 given, 3,341 received

China to be the Most Important Country in XXI Century - Jim Rogers

Sanction threats against Russia sent shockwaves of panic across the world of investment. Thereís still those who still believe in the prospects of the Russian economy, despite the political turmoil. So, what are these prospects? How are sanctions affecting the financial balance of power? And, finally, what does Moscowís turn to Beijing mean for the future of the global economy? We ask these questions to a renowned investor and businessman Ė Jim Rogers is on SophieCo today.

SS: Jim Rogers, renowned investor, businessman, author, welcome to the program, great to have you with us. Weíre going to start with sanctions, the West is busy with them, coming up is a new round for Russia Ė but Russia, meanwhile, has made a historic 30 year gas deal with China. How painful do you think the consequences could be for Europe and US?

JR: Well, I will have to say that Washington seems to be making one mistake after another and I donít like saying it, since Iím an American citizen, but, you know, America is driving China and Russia together Ė America is driving Russia more and more to AsiaÖ That cannot be good for America but they still keep making mistakes in Washington.

SS: So youíre saying the US and Europe unwillingly pushed Russia and China together?

JR: Unfortunately America seems to have really bungled this whole thing very badly. As you know, theyíve tried to instigate a coup in Ukraine against an elected government, and they did that somewhat successfully, but then they didnít think through the consequences. Mr. Putin seems to have outsmarted us, Putin now is in control of Crimea, which Russians have controlled for many decades, so thatís not so unusual Ė whatís unusual is that America didnít think through what they were doing, they seem to just react on a day-to-day basis, so nowÖ Crimea is part of Russia, the Russians have more and more allies in Asia. Iím afraid America just didnít think it through, theyíve bungled, theyíve acted on a day-to-day basis, and theyíve reacted to events instead of looking to the future and controlling events. Mr. Putin seems to have outsmarted Mr. Obama.

SS: You have called US actions in regards to Ukraine ďanother embarrassment for the US foreign policiesĒ. Why? Why do you think the US got involved in the first place?

JR: Thatís an extremely good question. Why did they get involved in the first place? Because we have incompetence in the State Department, in Washington. I guess they thought that they could take over control of Ukraine, which will give America more influence in central Europe and would certainly damage Russia, but in the end it seems to have strengthened Russia and has damaged America. You know, politicians make mistakes; bureaucrats make mistakes all the time. Looks like this time it was America that made the mistakes, and not Russia.

SS: But if youíre saying the whole Ukrainian affair is a geopolitical failure for America, why do you think it will also hurt the US economy? Where does the economy come in?

JR: I didnít say itís going to hurt US economy, not anytime soon. But, if Russia now does more and more trade with Asia, instead of with Europe and the West, then obviously thatís notÖ thatís good for Russia, thatís good for Asia, but America gets cut out and Europe gets cut out. You know, Russia used to sell a lot of gas to Europe, it still does, but if they stop selling natural gas to Europe, and sell it to Asia Ė that is not good for Europe, and, ultimately, not good for the US either, because the US and Europe are huge trading partners.

SS: George Soros proposed opening up US strategic oil reserves to drive the prices down in effort to hurt Russian economy. Now, is that feasible? Is punishing Russia worth tapping into those reserves?

JR: America does have oil reserves, but they are not enough toÖ I mean, if weíve sold all of our oil reserves, itís not enough to have any kind of significant effect on the world oil market. It might make the market go down for a day or weeks, or two weeks, even. But, then the markets itís going to go back before, and the market may even go back more, because then America would have sold its oil reserves, and we wouldnít have anything in reserve, soÖ again, you have to ask him, I donít know, but that doesnít seem like a very viable solution to me.

SS: But once again, in your opinion, if Russian gas is sent flowing eastward to China, and thereís trade trouble with Russian gas in Europe Ė will the US be able to fill the gap?

JR: No. America says it could, but it would take a long time for America in order to get natural gas from America to Europe. You donít just sort of snap your fingers and do that. You donít just put in on a boat or plane, youíve got to have special ports on both sides, youíve got to have special ships, and youíve got to have natural gas in the right place. Yeah, it could happen someday, but some day is a long time away, and if Russia stops selling natural gas to Europe Ė thatís going to hurt Europe for several years until American gas can come, and that if we presume and suppose that there is enough American natural gas to ship to Europe. Europe uses a lot of natural gas, and America at the moment seems to have surplus of a natural gas Ė will they have a surplus in five years? I donít know. Will we have enough to supply Europe gas for many years? I doubt it.

SS: I donít know if you know that the EU has begun sending financial aid to Ukraine. Do you think Ukraine will ever be able to pay that money back?

JR: Pay it back to the European Union? No, I doubt it very seriously. Theyíre going to have to take that money to pay Russia for the natural gas. I think this will be just a form of foreign aid from Europe to Ukraine, if they do it. I donít see how Ukraine can ever pay the money back.

SS: Now, as an investor, what economic benefits are there for the EU and the US? What are they expecting out of this whole affair? I mean, how do you attract investors to the country when there is civil war raging between East and the West?

JR: Sophie, youíre asking extremely good question. I donít see what was in it for Europe and the US, other than some kind of geopolitical game that bureaucrats and politicians like to play. I donít see what the purpose of this was other than some kind of supposed chess game. I donít see what America expected to get out of it. Ukraine has a lot of agriculture, but other than thatÖ I mean, those agricultural products get sold on to the world market, so I donít see why America tried to get so involved with Ukraine. It just does not make any sense to me, and as I said earlier, it seems to be hurting America now, rather than helping America, since the consequences have not gone the way they thought they would.

SS: But do you think the West has failed to isolate Russia politically and economically? Or is the West going to end up isolating Russia at the end?

JR: I donít see that it has hurt Russia. Maybe thereís something I donít know, but I donít see that this has hurt Russia in any way at this point.

SS: What all of this means for the dollar? I mean, last week Russiaís economy minister told me that ruble and other national currencies will be used for trade to diversify risk. So where does that leave dollar?

JR: Again, I donít particularly like saying this, because Iím an American citizen, and American taxpayer and American voter, but if you drive people away from the dollarÖ many people now must be sayingďguys, if we have dollars, and the US decides that they donít like us, theyíve going to put sanctions on us!ĒSo more and more people would say ďmaybe I shouldnít use the US dollar, maybe I shouldnít have my money in US dollars.Ē At the same time, as you know, Russia and China are now going to trade with each other in their own currencies instead of the US dollar. More and more people are doing the same thing, theyíre starting to trade in other currencies besides US dollar. This is just a continuing long-term move away from the US dollar. And, I am afraid, that US is pushing people away from the US dollar with our actions.

SS: So, if youíre saying that other players will move away from the dollar eventually, where does that leave the American economy?

JR: The US has been the worldís reserve currency, has had the worldís medium of exchange and so far weíve been able to do a lot of things because we can just print more US dollars. We have a huge balance of trade deficit; we have huge government deficits, because we can print more money. If there comes a time that we cannot print money, when the world will not just take US dollars because we sayďhere they are!Ē Ė then that cripples America in many-many ways. The Pentagon, the Defense Department of the US has already said that the deficit in the US is a major potential weakness from the military point of view. Just recently, the space people said ďevery country in the world has eventually collapsedĒ and the way America is going, we might collapse too. This is not me, this is the Defense Department of America, and this is the Space Agency of America saying these things. If you read history, Sophie, itís true, itís correct. When people do not have the money that they used to have Ė theyíre limited in many ways. You cannot have as many soldiers, you cannot have as many airplanes, you cannot send ships all over the world, because somebody has to pay for it, and if you donít have the money to pay for it anymore, youíre in trouble.

SS: You are known to invest in places where others will not dare to, and right now you seem to be putting your trust in Russia Ė why now, when all the instability in Ukraine is causing the ruble to fall, investors are extremely scared and cautious?

JR: Itís a been a long-term adage in the investment world that you buy when thereís a disaster, because if you buy when everybody else is panicking and dumping, youíre probably going to make a lot of money in the end Ė unless the world comes to an end. I donít suspect that Russia is going to come to an end, Russia has assets, Russia has lots of foreign currency in reserves as well, so when I saw Russia collapsing I thought I should buy, and I did buy. Iíve been becoming more optimistic about Russia over the past year or two anyway, because you do have big reserves and there are positive changes taking place in Russia as far as Iím concerned, so I hope, Sophie, that your parents taught you to buy low and sell high Ė thatís what Iím trying to do.

SS: Listen; why not invest in Ukraine in that case? I mean, obviously, thatís where the real turmoil was going on, you can buy really low right nowÖ

JR: I certainly could, but I have only been to Ukraine twice in my life, but Iíll tell you Ė I have never been impressed by the government or the management of Ukraine. You donít buy something just because itís low Ė because it can get lower and lower and lower. Iíd rather buy a sound situation, rather than one that is in turmoil and itís going to continue to be in turmoil. If youíve looked at the Ukrainian government over the past 10-15 years Ė you know what Iím talking about. Someday, of course, I might invest in Ukraine, but not now.

SS: So what are you thinking Ė how soon will all this political turmoil blows over for the Russian market? A month, a year?

JR: I would suspect that itís going toÖ America may put on some more sanctions of some sort, but even that is not working terribly well. As you probably know, the Canadians, who are first allies of America, recently said ďNo, weíre not going to do this anymore, we donít want to play this game of sanctions against RussiaĒ. Europeans donít seem to be too keen on sanctions, so I suspect that the sanctions after another round or two will probably sort of dry up and go away, because again, itís doing nothing. It doesnít hurt the Russians Ė doesnít seem to. There are plenty of people who will do business with the Russians, look at the map, Russia is gigantic country, there are lots of countries that will do business with Russia, and so I donít suspect that this is going to last much longer.

SS: Now, you personally, in terms of investing in Russia, youíre looking at non-energy companies. Is it right?

JR: I have plenty of energy investment, so Iím not investing in energy companies in Russia. Iím trying to find other parts of the Russian economy.

SS: Well, thatís what I was going to ask you Ė what do you invest in, in Russia?

JR: I buy the Russian index, which is a basket of Russian shares. I own shares of the Moscowís stock exchange, I own Aeroflot, and Iím looking for other areas to invest. I donít have any others yet, but Iím looking.

SS: Look, Iíve got a sense from what youíre saying, that the more sanctions are imposed, the more buying opportunities there are in Russia. Is thatís how it works, exactly?

JR: I said, ďif there are more sanctionsĒ. Washington keeps saying theyíre going to put on more sanctions, so I presume they will. Thatís what they say theyíre going to do, they probably will do it. And usually, when something like that happens, stock get weak, at least for a while. I have no idea of whatís going to happen, whether they will do it, or whether the stocks will get weak. But it often does.

SS: Okay, but buying low, like you say, seems like a well-known basic strategy Ė but youíre not afraid for the long-term state of the Russian economy? Even with a possible third wave of sanctions?

JR: No, of course. My point about sanctions is that they donít seem to be hurting Russia, I donít see that thereís any major sanctions that can hurt Russia over any extended period of time, so, no, I am for one do not see how sanctions from America, especially if their allies donít go along with them, or donít go along with them in a big way Ė I donít see how that can hurt Russia other than, maybe, in the short-term. Itís just that I donít see it.

SS: With all these numerous trade deals, signed in Shanghai, do you think it will lure investors back to Russia, reassure them?

JR: Yes. I mean, the Russian market is already up over the last couple of months, as youíve probably know. Yes, more and more people see that the sanctions arenít very viable, that they havenít hurt Russia Ė in fact, in some ways it is strengthening Russia because now theyíre doing more business with China. China is a pretty successful economy, so itís not hurting, and in some ways itís actually helping Russia, because itís driving Russia to other parts of the world, Russia doesnít have to use the US dollar to trade with China now, because Chinese and Russians made currency deals. Itís just driving people away from the US dollar, not towards the US dollars.

SS: Now do you expect seeing gains from your investments in Russia, letís say, during your lifetime?

JR: During my lifetime?

SS: Yep.

JR: Well, I hope Iíll live a long time, Sophie, so Ė yes. I hope Iíll live a long, long time.

SS: Well, we hope too. But tell me one more thing: do you think thereís a shift in global economic balance? Are we going to see more Asian giants sign economic deals with Russia, you think?

JR: Oh, Iím sure we will. If at no other reason, and the fact that the Russians are now pushing more towards Asia, partly out of necessity, and so you will certainly seeÖ I know that Moscow was putting huge amounts of money to the Far East, I know that youíve built a railroad all the way into North Korea. I know Russia is putting a push towards Asia, and obviously, if there are opportunities for Asians, theyíre going to take advantage of it. So, no, itís happening.

SS: You have said that youíre that Moscow is on its way to become an international financial center Ė you really think it has what it takes?

JR: No, what Iíve said was that Iím astonished that they think that, that theyíre going to try Ė I donít know if they can make that. Mr. Putin says he wants to have Moscow a major financial center. Iím astonished. Iíve never thought of Moscow as a potential financial center, but I do know, Moscow is going to spend a lot of money and time and energy, trying to develop itself as a major financial center. And just by trying they are going to make Moscow more attractive. Whether it works or not in 10-15 years? I donít know, but in the meantime, a lot of money and effort is going into trying to make it a financial center.

SS: Talking about 10-15 years: I know your children have been learning Chinese from very young age. Is that where the future is, in China?

JR: In my view, China is going to be the most important country in the 21st century, whether we like or not. Again, this move of Russia more towards Asia just reinforces that whole trend of China becoming more and more important in the world.

SS: Why are you investing in Russia, then? Or are you investing in Russia and China as well?

JR: Well, Russia is one of the most hated stock markets in the world, perhaps second only to Argentina, which is hated more. I have learned, when things like that happen, they usually put it cheap, Russia has a convertible currency, has a very low debt, has lots of resources, and when the stocks get knocked down, I started investing. Listen, I was very bearish on Russia for forty six years of my life. Iíve only started becoming positive on Russia in the last couple of years. I do think I see opportunities and therefore Iím investing.

SS: So when did you first come to Russia?

JR: I first went to Russia in 1966! And came away pessimistic, and was pessimistic for the next 46 years. I knew I wouldnít work. But now I see positive changes taking place, and so Iíve started investing in Russia.

SS: So, when was that moment that actually changed your mind? You remember?

JR: No, no, it was not anything specific; it was a series of events. I went to Vladivostok; I saw what was happening in Vladivostok. I saw changes, I went to Moscow a couple of times, I saw changes taking placeÖ I heard some of the government officials and what they were doing, how they were setting up investment funds to invest with foreigners, so that everybody would either make money or lose money together. I saw a variety of things happening over a period of time, and in that result I decided that Russia wasnít as bad as it had been for 46 years.

SS: I want to ask one more question about China. Iím thinking that China is still an emerging market, even though that it is huge and strong, and it hasnít suffered any crises yet. But, it might at some point, like all markets do Ė so when that happens, how do other world markets protect themselves, is it even possible?

JR: Well, China is the second largest economy in the world, and if the second largest economy in the world has problems, itís going to affect some people. If nothing else, the people who do business with China, will be suffering. Thatís a lot of people, because it is such a huge economy now. Itís just likeÖif America has problems; it affects a lot of people. If Japan has problems, it affects some people. So there is no question that China will have problems Ė I donít know what, or when, or why Ė but every country has problems, somewhere along the line. What is a little bit unusual is that itís been a long time since China has had major problems. That is extremely unusual. Thatís one reason Iím not buying many shares in China right now: they have big debts, internal debts, so Iím waiting in case thereís a problem coming out of China. If there is problem or some problems, I hope, Iím smart enough to buy more china.

SS: Alright, Jim, thank you so much for this interesting insight, for your advice. We were talking to Jim Rogers, renowned investor and businessman, author. We were talking about whom the sanctions can benefit and also why should people invest in Russia and not China. Thatís it for this edition of Sophie&Co, see you next time.

The Future of the Global Economy ?

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to kbit for this post:
  #2 (permalink)
Elite Member
Kyoto, Japan
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: TW TOS LiveVol
Broker/Data: TD, TW, IB, Saxo
Favorite Futures: UVXY, VXX, VIX, /VX
suko's Avatar
Posts: 1,164 since Oct 2013
Thanks: 768 given, 1,110 received

JR: "Listen, I was very bearish on Russia for forty six years of my life. Iíve only started becoming positive on Russia in the last couple of years.

Reply With Quote


futures io > > > > China to be the Most Important Country in XXI Century - Jim Rogers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Fundraiser: Feeding Families in Need (ends Dec 17)


Battlestations! Show us your trading desks w/GFF Brokers ($750 in Prizes)


An Afternoon With Morad Askar (aka FuturesTrader71)

Elite only

Traders Tax Advice w/Ryan Curran CPA

Elite only

Black Swan Events w/Adam Grimes

Elite only

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OIL, CHINA, LIES, BIKE LANES: Jim Rogers Tells All kbit News and Current Events 0 March 11th, 2012 07:46 PM
Art Cashin On The Most Important History Lesson Of The Last Century kbit News and Current Events 0 October 13th, 2011 12:00 PM
China Bears Are 'Dead Wrong,' Says Jim Rogers Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 July 4th, 2011 10:40 PM
Jim Rogers: Crisis That Could End The China Boom kbit News and Current Events 0 May 28th, 2011 08:42 PM
Interview With Jim Rogers kbit News and Current Events 0 May 1st, 2011 11:37 AM

30 year, dow, natural gas, short-term, strategy, trading, trend

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 PM. (this page content is cached, log in for real-time version)

Copyright © 2018 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432 WhatsApp Business,
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2018-12-15 in 0.17 seconds with 14 queries on phoenix