SEC judge suspends 'Big Four' China units over audits - News and Current Events | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading

SEC judge suspends 'Big Four' China units over audits
Updated: Views / Replies:149 / 0
Created: by kbit Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Thread Tools Search this Thread

SEC judge suspends 'Big Four' China units over audits

  #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,884 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,303 given, 3,334 received

SEC judge suspends 'Big Four' China units over audits

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. judge has ruled that the Chinese units of the "Big Four" accounting firms should be suspended from practicing in the United States for six months, an escalation in a long-running dispute between U.S. and Chinese regulators over access to audit documents.

In a harshly worded 112-page ruling, Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Law Judge Cameron Elliot censured the Chinese units of KPMG, Deloitte & Touche, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst and Young.

Elliot censured a fifth firm, Dahua, previously a member of the BDO international network, but did not impose a six-month suspension.

Elliot, an SEC judge who operates independently, sided with the agency and said the companies "willfully" failed to give U.S. regulators the audit work papers of certain Chinese companies under investigation for accounting fraud.

Wednesday's ruling does not go into effect immediately, and the firms might appeal. That process would take time because it must first be made to the five-member commission before it can be heard in a U.S. federal appeals court.

The decision is not expected to be immediately disruptive to the U.S.-listed Chinese companies relying on these firms to review their 2013 books.

But if the decision ultimately stands, it could have a major impact on the estimated 200 Chinese companies that rely on the Big Four to audit their books.

"This decision will be a huge shock in Beijing. The SEC has pushed a lot of chips out on the table," said Paul Gillis, an accounting professor at Peking University in Beijing.

Gillis noted that some of the Big Four's smaller competitors, like Grant Thornton and RSM, do not have the capacity to handle the workload. "Everybody is just starting their annual audits. If the Big 4 can't sign these audits, all these companies are in a hell of a pickle," he added.

Representatives for the Big Four in the United States did not have immediate comments. A spokesman for the U.S.-based unit of BDO referred all questions to China.

"I think the decision came totally unexpected to the firms," said Jason Flemmons, a senior managing director at FTI Consulting who helped bring the case against the firms when he worked in the SEC's Enforcement Division.

"That said, this will undoubtedly be appealed, which will significantly delay the institution of the six-month bars."


The judge's decision marks a major victory for the SEC, which for years tried with limited success to gain access to audit work conducted by Chinese accounting firms for Chinese companies that list in U.S. markets.

Several companies that have listed on U.S. stock exchanges have been plagued with accounting scandals.

The SEC has tried to delist or de-register some troubled companies, but has said investigations into possible fraud were stymied by the firms' failure to turn over audit work papers.

The accounting firms have repeatedly declined to share their audits, saying Chinese secrecy laws forbid it. They urged the SEC to pursue a diplomatic solution with China instead.

After years of often strained negotiations with Chinese regulators, the SEC decided in late 2012 to pursue sanctions against the firms.

The judge declined to impose a permanent bar as the SEC requested. But he said a six-month bar was in the public interest, and said he had "little sympathy" for the firms.

"Respondents operated large accounting businesses for years, knowing that, if called upon to cooperate in a Commission investigation into their business, they must necessarily fail to fully cooperate and might thereby violate the law," he said.

"Such behavior does not demonstrate good faith, indeed, quite the opposite - it demonstrates gall."

The SEC said it was gratified by the decision, which upholds its authority.

"These records are critical to our ability to investigate potential securities law violations and protect investors," said Matthew Solomon, the chief litigation counsel in the SEC's Enforcement Division.

It is not clear what impact the decision could have on major U.S. firms that had become concerned that they could be drawn into the international dispute in a way that could compromise their ability to produce audited accounts.

U.S. firms with major Chinese businesses include fast food group Yum Brands Inc, tech firm Qualcomm and construction equipment maker Caterpillar.

Bradley J. Bondi, the head of the SEC enforcement practice at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP and a former SEC attorney, said he was skeptical the "draconian" ruling would stand if appealed.

"Under a conflicts of law analysis, the more-stringent Chinese law, which would subject these firms to criminal exposure for complying with the SEC's subpoenas, takes priority over the U.S. government's interests in obtaining this information," he said.


It remains to be seen whether Wednesday's ruling could hinder the SEC's diplomatic bid to convince China to provide greater access to audit work papers, an effort that has led to improved ties since the summer.

During testimony in this case, the SEC revealed that China had agreed to send 20 boxes of audit work for Longtop Financial Technologies, one of the companies under investigation for fraud. In addition, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which registers, inspects and disciplines auditors, has been pursuing a diplomatic solution for gaining access to the work papers.

In May, the PCAOB reached a deal with China that has allowed it to get some audit documents in connection with investigations. The board is still hoping for cross-border cooperation so its inspectors can also examine China-based audit firms.

Recognizing the risk that the ruling could strain diplomatic ties, Elliot said he decided to seal large portions of his decision that delve into Chinese-SEC relations.

"I am hopeful that the commission and the (China Securities Regulatory Commission) will continue to constructively engage one another," he wrote.

A PCAOB spokeswoman declined to comment on Wednesday's ruling.

SEC judge suspends 'Big Four' China units over audits - Yahoo Finance

Reply With Quote


futures io > > > > SEC judge suspends 'Big Four' China units over audits

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Wyckoff Hunting for Great Risk/Reward Ratio w/Gary Fullett

Elite only

Digging into the Details of iSystems w/Stage 5 & iSystems

Jun 5

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Virtual tax audits via video conferencing may be coming soon kbit News and Current Events 0 April 5th, 2012 09:52 PM
Audits begin at Apple's Chinese supplier plants GridKing News and Current Events 0 February 13th, 2012 02:01 PM
SEC Uses “Because I Said So” Tactic With Judge Rakoff kbit News and Current Events 0 November 7th, 2011 08:36 PM
SEC says it likely tossed some info on big banks kbit News and Current Events 0 September 14th, 2011 10:32 PM
Profitability Sample Size Units westgawolf Psychology and Money Management 5 June 6th, 2011 08:00 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Copyright © 2018 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432,
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2018-05-25 in 0.08 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP