Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on - News and Current Events | futures io social trading
futures io futures trading

Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on
Updated: Views / Replies:196 / 1
Created: by kbit Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Thread Tools Search this Thread

Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on

  #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,859 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,299 given, 3,324 received

Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on

Well, here’s a novel idea: Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) has introduced legislation that would make it mandatory for elected lawmakers to actually read bills before voting for or against them.

From Washington, D.C. on Friday, Sen. Paul put forth a bill that, if passed, would permit one full day of reading for every 20 pages of legislation being presented. He introduced the bill last week before the US Senate was scheduled to vote on a 600-page legislation that brought together topics as varying as highway funding and student loans all into a single document proposal.

“Not one member of the Senate will read this bill before we vote on it,” Paul insisted. "For goodness sakes, this is a 600-page bill. I got it this morning.”

Paul suggested that the lack of public faith in the current Congress could be blamed on, among other things, lawmakers lacking a basic understanding of the legislation they are elected to decide on. Rule 28, Paragraph 9 of the Senate guidebook currently require bills to be put on hold for 48 hours before being brought up for vote, but Sen. Paul said even that provision is rarely enforced.

“Congress has a 10 percent approval rating and one of the reasons is that we don’t even obey our own rules,” said the Senator. "At the very least, we ought to adhere to our own rules," he said. "Forty-eight hours is still a challenge to find out everything in here."

In hopes of remedying the public’s disapproval with Washington, Paul put forth his bill that he hopes will help Congress come to terms with the exact issues they are expected to vote on.

"In keeping with my pledge to increase transparency and accessibility in the U.S. Senate, I am proud to introduce this rule change today. Too often in Congress, legislation is shoved through without hearings, amendments or debate. If we are to answer to the American people, it is imperative we pay close attention to the legislation we consider to ensure it is in concert with the Constitution and purview of the Senate's authority,” he said.

Paul also introduced a separate legislation, S. 3359, which he described as “A bill to end the practice of including more than one subject in a single bill by requiring that each bill enacted by Congress be limited to only one subject.”

Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on — RT

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MultiCharts.NET, S5, Ninj
Broker/Data: AMP, S5, IB
Favorite Futures: ES
DionysusToast's Avatar
Posts: 2,494 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 752 given, 7,649 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary

Something is very wrong when the bills end up being 600 pages.

600 pages - no-one reads it
600 pages - no-one implements it
600 pages - anything can be slipped into it

I also doubt that anyone other than a lawyer could decifer the documents, hence 20 pages per day.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to DionysusToast for this post:


futures io > > > > Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

FIO Journal Challenge featuring NinjaTrader ($2,000+ of prizes)


Prototyping Python Strategies (part 2) w/Ran Aroussi

Elite only

Ask Me Anything w/Raymond Deux @ NinjaTrader

May 3

An Afternoon with FIO member Softsoap

Elite only

Machine Learning & Data Mining Bias w/Kris Longmore @ Robot Wealth

Elite only

Brannigan Barrett (TBA)

Elite only

FIO member Gomi (TBA)

Elite only

FuturesTrader71 (TBA)

Elite only

EasyLanguage Programming w/Chris @ ABC Trading Group

Elite only

Portfolio Diversification w/Brendon Delate

Elite only

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rand Paul takes on drone surveillance kbit News and Current Events 0 June 13th, 2012 06:22 PM
Rand Paul Launches Campaign to End the TSA kbit News and Current Events 0 May 3rd, 2012 03:29 PM
.....Lehman says voting creditors back bankruptcy plan kbit News and Current Events 0 November 29th, 2011 07:49 PM
Sen. Rand Paul seeks no confidence vote on Geithner GridKing News and Current Events 0 August 10th, 2011 11:31 PM
G20: Europe Gives up Some of Its IMF Voting Seats Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 October 23rd, 2010 11:10 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a. Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-04-30 in 0.08 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP