NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





LEAVE IT TO FRANCE PART DEUX


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
    1. trending_up 921 views
    2. thumb_up 3 thanks given
    3. group 2 followers
    1. forum 2 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

LEAVE IT TO FRANCE PART DEUX

  #1 (permalink)
 
kbit's Avatar
 kbit 
Aurora, Il USA
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: futures
Posts: 5,854 since Nov 2010
Thanks Given: 3,295
Thanks Received: 3,364

Just when you thought the leader of France couldn’t come up with a dumber idea than reducing the retirement age from 62 to 60, Mike Shedlock reports about an even more brainless idea from the clearly dimwitted leader of France. His plan is to make it so expensive for companies in France to fire people that they never hire them in the first place. The logic is so pure and assinine that Obama is sure to jump on the idea as part of his platform for re-election. The Frenchies don’t believe in the business cycle and the fact that when demand declines, companies need to get their costs in line with revenues. Hollande knows best. This is like watching a French comedy with subtitles. Except it isn’t really funny. It’s sad.


Hollande About to Wreck France With Economically Insane Proposal: “Make Layoffs So Expensive For Companies That It’s Not Worth It”


Unemployment in France touched 10.2% in April, a number last seen in 1999 according to data from Eurostat.


click on chart for sharper image

The question on newly-elected President Francois Hollande’s mind is what to do about it.

Economic Insanity

Hollande’s layoff clampdown solution according to Labour Minister Michel Sapin is to “make layoffs so expensive for companies that it’s not worth it.”

France’s new Socialist government is planning to ramp up the cost of laying off workers for companies in the coming months, its labour minister said on Thursday after data showed the jobless rate hit the highest level this century at 10 percent.

“The main idea is to make layoffs so expensive for companies that it’s not worth it,” Sapin said in an interview with France Info radio.

“It’s not a question of sanctions, but workers have to have compensation at the right level,” he said.

Industry Minister Arnaud Montebourg is also planning legislation that would force companies to sell plants they want to get rid of at market prices to avoid closures and job losses.

Four Things, All of Them Bad

Mass layoffs will occur before the law passes.
Companies will move any jobs they can overseas.
Ongoing, if it’s difficult to fire people, companies will not hire them in the first place.
Corporate profits will collapse along with the stock market should the need to fire people arise.

The proposal to force companies to sell plants rather than fire workers as outlined by Industry Minister Arnaud Montebourg and Labour Minister Michel Sapin is nothing short of economic insanity.

Nannycrat Dilemma

Think the Nannycrats in Brussels will go for this idea? If they do, they will wreck all of Europe. If they don’t, then how are they going to “harmonize” everything?

For more on nannycrats and the nannyzone please see …

Huge Nannycrat Conflict Coming Right Up; Hollande Lowers Pension Age to 60
Another Meaningless Nannycrat Rumor: Europe Mulls “Secret Plan for New Europe”
“Multi-Stage” Nannycrat Proposals; Devaluation – The Last Option? Note to Wolfgang Münchau, Martin Wolf, Jeremy Siegel at the Financial Times: Focus on the Obtanium not the Unobtanium

Also see my original post on the “nannyzone” written June 2, 2011, nearly one year ago today: Trichet Calls for Creation of European “Nanny-State” and Fiscal “Nanny-Zone”

Addendum:

Reader “Bob” writes ….

Point 3 is the biggest but it gets even more insidious. The companies that have enough employees now are generally larger companies with a political voice. The companies that will need employees later are generally smaller, entrepreneurial companies with no political voice.

Since most job creation happens at the entrepreneurial level, the proposed policy will subsidize corporate stagnation while stemming the flow of entrepreneurial companies entering the market.

Over the long haul, this will kill France’s economic competitiveness while increasing unemployment.

Recall government enforced jobs in the former USSR in the 1980′s. How well did that go? Things got got so bad the USSR had to dissolve.


Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
About a successful futures trader who didn´t know anyth …
Psychology and Money Management
Cheap historycal L1 data for stocks
Stocks and ETFs
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
What broker to use for trading palladium futures
Commodities
 
  #2 (permalink)
 GFIs1 
who cares
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: None
Platform: nobody interested
Broker: none
Trading: forget about it
Posts: 6,939 since Feb 2012
Thanks Given: 6,196
Thanks Received: 15,609


kbit View Post
Just when you thought the leader of France couldn’t come up with a dumber idea than reducing the retirement age from 62 to 60, Mike Shedlock reports about an even more brainless idea from the clearly dimwitted leader of France. His plan is to make it so expensive for companies in France to fire people that they never hire them in the first place. The logic is so pure and assinine that Obama is sure to jump on the idea as part of his platform for re-election. The Frenchies don’t believe in the business cycle and the fact that when demand declines, companies need to get their costs in line with revenues. Hollande knows best.

Thanks @kbit for the article.
I must disagree in several points being made in order to raise fear for the political Europe:

Facts are that
1) in France already since more than 30 years this restricted scenario for the bigger companies exists as the socialist influenced every company moves to the most terrible - so that IS LIVED already for a long time
2) No president during his time in charge (be it a socailist president or not) could change the rules with long time effect
3) The worst drawback for France's economy goes back to the cutting down weekly working hours from 42 to 38 and then to 35... more than 10 years ago - this is lived too
4) Today the retirement medium age in France is under 60 already - as many people like to quit the job earlier
5) The unemployment rate in France was always little higher than in comparable countries - the productivity itself stayed mostly unchanged due to more automatisation in the processing

Shortly:
A president in France has not really the power to change basic items in France's politics and even less in Europe's politics.

GFIs1 lays back and relaxes...

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #3 (permalink)
 
Laurent's Avatar
 Laurent 
France
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: MC, MetaTrader
Trading: Stocks, Turbos, FX
Posts: 36 since Nov 2010
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 8


If you want a french point of view on the european crisis, you should read this blog:
Paul Jorion's Blog

But do not forget that's not better in US... you just print money with the FED.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on June 10, 2012


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts